Genre and disciplinary competence: A case study of contextualisation in an academic speech genre

English for Specific Purposes

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 217-229

  Morton, Janne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349255889     PISSN: 08894906     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.esp.2009.04.005     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Anthony K.H. Design juries on trial: The renaissance of the design studio (1991), Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York
2. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). The problem of speech genres. In C. Emerson, & M. Holquist (Eds.), Speech genres and other late essays (translated by V. W. McGee). Austin, Tex: University of Texas Press.
3. Berkenkotter C., and Huckin T.N. Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition, culture, power (1995), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
4. Blommaert J. Discourse (2005), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
5. Bourdieu P. Language and symbolic power (1991), Blackwell, Cambridge
6. Coyne R., Snodgrass A., and Martin D. Metaphors in the design studio. Journal of Architectural Education 48 2 (1994) 113-125
7. Dannels D.P. Performing tribal rituals: A genre analysis of "crits" in design studios. Communication Education 54 2 (2005) 136-160
8. Darling A.L. Public presentations in mechanical engineering and the discourse of technology. Communication Education 54 1 (2005) 20-33
9. Dressen-Hammouda D. From novice to disciplinary expert: Disciplinary identity and genre mastery. English for Specific Purposes 27 (2007) 233-252
10. Freadman A. Models of genre for language teaching. South Central Review 15 1 (1998) 19-39
11. Freedman A., and Medway P. Genre and the new rhetoric (1994), Taylor & Francis, London
12. Groat L.N., and Ahrentzen S. Reconceptualising architectural education for a more diverse future: Perceptions and visions of architectural students. Journal of Architectural Education 49 3 (1996) 166-183
13. Gumperz J. Discourse strategies (1982), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
14. Halliday M.A.K. An introduction to functional grammar. 2nd ed. (1994), Arnold, London
15. Hyland K. Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing (2000), Pearson, London
16. Jacoby, S. (1998). Science as performance:socializing scientific discourse through the conference talk rehearsal. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles.
17. Lemke J.L. Textual politics: Discourse and social dynamics (1995), Taylor & Francis, London
18. Lemke, J. L. (1999). Typology, topology, topography: Genre semantics. .
19. Medway P. Virtual and material buildings: Construction and constructivism in architecture and writing. Written Communication 14 4 (1996) 473-514
20. Medway P., and Clark B. Imagining the building: Architectural design as semiotic construction. Design Studies 24 3 (2003) 255-273
21. Miller C. Genre as social action. In: Freedman A., and Medway P. (Eds). Genre and the new rhetoric (1994), Taylor & Francis, London 23-42
22. Morton J., and O'Brien D. Selling your design: Oral communication pedagogy in architectural design education. Journal of Communication Education 54 1 (2005) 6-19
23. Ochs E., and Capps L. Living narrative: Creating lives in everyday storytelling (2001), Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass
24. Ochs E., Gonzales P., and Jacoby S. Interpretative journeys: How physicists talk and travel through graphic space. Configurations 1 (1994) 151-171
25. Prior P. Writing/Disciplinarity: A sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy (1998), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
26. Rowley-Jolivet E., and Carter-Thomas S. The rhetoric of conference presentation introductions: Context, argument and interaction. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 15 1 (2005) 45-70
27. Stevens G. Struggle in the studio: A Bourdivin look at architectural pedagogy. Journal of Architectural Education 49 2 (1995) 105-122
28. Swales J.M. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings (1990), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
29. Swales J., Barks D., Ostermann A., and Simpson R. Between critique and accommodation: Reflections on an EAP course for masters of architecture students. English for Specific Purposes 20 (2001) 439-458
30. Thompson S. As the story unfolds: The uses of narrative in research presentations. In: Ventola E., Shalom C., and Thompson S. (Eds). The language of conferencing (2002), Peter Lang, Frankfurt 147-167
31. Webster H. The architectural review: A study of ritual, acculturation and reproduction in architectural education. Arts & Humanities in Higher Education 4 3 (2005) 265-282
32. Webster H. The analytics of power: Re-presenting the design jury. Journal of Architectural Education 60 3 (2007) 21-27
33. Wood, P. (2003). The critique: An investigation into the cultural role of the design critique in architectural education. In Design + Research, Proceedings of the Second International Conference of the Association of Architecture Schools of Australasia, University of Melbourne, September, pp. 28-30.