Virtual and material buildings construction and constructivism in architecture and writing

Written Communication

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 473-514

  Medway, Peter ^a  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000137809     PISSN: 07410883     EISSN: 15528472     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0741088396013004002     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ackerman/J. (1993). The promise of writing to leam. Written Communication, 10,334-370.
2. Ackerman, J., & Dates, S. (1996). Image, text, and power in architectural design and workplace writing. In A. H. Duin & C. J. Hansen (Eds.), Nonacademic writing: Social theory and technology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Baird, G. (1995). Tlie space of appearance. Cambridge: MIT Press.
5. Braverman, H. (1974). Labor and monopoly capital. New York: Monthly Review Press.
6. Gallon, M., Law, J., & Rip, A. (Eds.). (1986). Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology of science in the real world. London: Maonillan.
7. Chandler, D. (1995). The act of writing: A media tlieory approach. Aberystwyth: Prifysgol Cymru/University of Wales.
8. Chin, E. (1994). Redefining "context" in research on writing. Written Communication, 11 (4), 445-482.
9. Doheny-Farina, S. (1992). Rhetoric, innovation, technology: Case studies of technical communication in technology transfers. Cambridge: MTT Press.
10. Eagleton, T. (1983). Literary theory: An introduction. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
11. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Vintage.
12. Freud, S. (1984). Negation. In Penguin Freud Library: Vol. 11. On Melapsychology: The theory of psychoanalysis (pp. 435-442). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin. (Original work published 1925)
13. Geisler, C. (1993). The relationship between language and design in mechanical engineering: Some preliminary observations. Technical Communication, 40,173-176.
14. Gusdorf, G. (1965). Speaking (La Parole). (P. T. Brockelman, Trans.). Chicago: Northwestem University Press. (Original work published 1953)
15. Haas, C. (1990). Composing in technological contexts: A study of note-making. Written Communication, 7(4), 512-547.
16. Halliday, M. A. (1976). Halliday: System and function in language. Selected papers edited by G. Kress. London: Oxford University Press.
17. Halliday, M. A. (1978). Language as social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.
18. Halliday, M. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold (Nelson).
19. Herrington, A. J. (1985). Writing in academic settings. Astudyofthe contexts for writing in two college chemical engineering courses. Research in the Teaching of English, 19, 331-359.
20. Hodge, R, & Kress, G. (1993). Language as ideology (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
21. Jarocinski, S. (1976). Impressionism and symbolism. London: Eulenburg.
22. Jencks, C. (1973). Modern movements in architecture. Garden City, NJ: Anchor.
23. Kostof, S. (1985). A history of architecture: Sellings and rituals. New York: Oxford University Press.
24. Lanham, R. A. (1989). The electronic word: Literary study and the digital revolution. New Literary History, 20(2), 265-290.
25. Lynch, M, & Woolgar, S. (1990a). Introduction: Sociological orientations to representational practice in science. In M. Lynch & S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in scientific practice (pp. 1-18). Cambridge: MIT Press.
26. Lynch, M., & Woolgar, S. (Eds.). (1990b). Representation in scientific practice. Cambridge: MIT Press.
27. McCarthy, L. P. (1991). A psychiatrist using DSM-UI: The influence of a charter document in psychiatry. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dyivimics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in professional communities (pp. 358-378). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
28. McCarthy, L. P., & Gerring, J. P. (1994). Revising psychiatry's charter document: DSMIV. Written Communication, 11(2), 147-192.
29. Medway, P. (1994). The language component in technological capability: Lessons from architecture. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 4(1), 85-107.
30. Medway, P. (19%). Writing, speaking, drawing: The distribution of meaning in architects' communication. In M. Sharpies & T. van der Geest (Eds.), The new writing environment: Writers at work in a world of technology (pp. 25-42). London: Springer Verlag.
31. Medway, P. (in press). Representation and making: Student production in English. Clianging English, 3(2).
32. Nattiez, ].-].(l990).Musicanddiscourse:Towardasemiology of music. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
33. Olson, D. R. (1995). Conceptualizing the written word: An intellectual autobiography. Written Communication, 12(3), 277-297.
34. OToole, M. (1994). The language of displayed art. London: Leicester University Press.
35. Patin, T. (1993). From deep structure to an architecture in suspense: Peter Eisenman, structuralism, and deconstruction. Journal of Architectural Education, 47(2), 88-100.
36. Peirce, C. (1931-1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vols. 1-6, C. Hartshome & P. Weiss, Eds.; Vols. 7-8, A. W. Burks, Ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37. Plowman, L. (1992). Talking and writing in a group writing task: A sodocognitive perspective. Brighton, UK: University of Sussex School of Cognitive and Computing Science.
38. Rowe, C, & Slutzky, R. (1976). Transparency: Literal and phenomenal. In C. Rowe (Ed.), The mathematics of the ideal villa and other essays. Cambridge: MIT Press.
39. Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
40. Sebeok, T., & Umiker-Sebeok, J. (1987). The semiotic web. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
41. Selzer, J. (1983). The composing processes of engineers. College Composition and Communication, 34(2), 178-187.
42. Shepherd, J. (1991). Music as social text. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
43. Smagorinsky, P. (1995, February). Constructing meaning in the disciplines: Reconceptualising writing across the curriculum as composing across the curriculum. American Journal of Education, 103,160-184.
44. Smagorinksy, P., & Coppock, J. (1994). Cultural tools and the classroom context: An exploration of an artistic response to literature. Written Communication, 11(3), 283310.
45. Smagorinksy, P., & Coppock, J. (1995). The reader, the text, the context: An exploration of a choreographed response to literature. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27(3), 271-298.
46. Thomas, W., & Thomas, D. S. (1928). The child in America. New York: Knopf.
47. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978a). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978b). The prehistory of written language. In Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological processes (pp. 105-119). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1935)
49. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language (A. Kozulin, Ed. and Trans.). Cambridge: MIT Press. (Original work published 1934)
50. Winsor, D. (1989). An engineer's writing and the corporate construction of knowledge. Written Communication, 6(2), 270-285.
51. Winsor, D. (1994). Invention and writing in technical work. Written Communication, 11, 227-250.
52. Witte, S. P. (1992). Context, text, intertext: Toward a constructivist semiotic of writing. Written Communication, 9(2) 237-308.
53. Wood, C. C. (1992). A study of Hie graphical mediating representations used by collaborative authors. Brighton, UK: University of Sussex School of Cognitive and Computing Science.