Parentage and sibship exclusions: Higher statistical power with more family members

Heredity

Volumn 99, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 205-217

  Wang, J ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF ZOOLOGY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Exclusion probability; Genetic markers; Parentage; Relatedness; Sibship

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

EXCLUSION EXPERIMENT; GENETIC MARKER; PARENTAGE; SIBLING;

ALLELE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC MARKER; GENETICS; MALE; PEDIGREE; POPULATION GENETICS; REPRODUCTION; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC MARKERS; GENETICS, POPULATION; MALE; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PEDIGREE; REPRODUCTION;

EID: 34547207025     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800984     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Adams EM, Jones AG, Arnold SJ (2005). Multiplepaternityin a natural population of a salamander with long-term sperm storage. Mol Ecol 14: 1803-1810.
2. Almudevar A, Field C (1999). Estimation of single-generation sibling relationships based on DNA markers. J Agric Biol Env Stat 4: 136-165.
3. Avise JC, Jones AG, Walker D, DeWoody JA (2002). Genetic mating systems and reproductive natural histories of fishes: lessons for ecology and evolution. Annu Rev Genet 36: 19-45.
4. Beyer J, May B (2003). A graph-theoretic approach to the partition of individuals into full-sib families. Mol Ecol 12: 2243-2250.
5. Blouin MS, Parsons M, Lacaille V, Lotz S (1996). Use of microsatellite loci to classify individuals by relatedness. Mol Ecol 5: 393-401.
6. Bretman A, Tregenza T (2005). Measuring polyandry in wild populations: a case study using promiscuous crickets. Mol Ecol 14: 2169-2179.
7. Butler K, Field C, Herbinger CM, Smith BR (2004). Accuracy, efficiency and robustness of four algorithms allowing full sibship reconstruction from DNA marker data. Mol Ecol 13: 1589-1600.
8. Chakraborty R, Meagher TR, Smouse PE (1988). Parentage analysis with genetic markers in natural populations. I. The expected proportion of offspring with unambiguous paternity. Genetics 118: 527-536.
9. Chakraborty R, Shaw M, Schull WJ (1974). Exclusion of probability: the current state of the art. Am J Hum Genet 26: 477-488.
10. Chapple DG, Keogh JS (2005). Complex mating system and dispersal patterns in a social lizard, Egernia whitii. Mol Ecol 14: 1215-1227.
11. Coltman DW, Bancroft DR, Robertson A, Smith JA, Clutton-Brock TH, Pemberton JM (1999). Male reproductive success in a promiscuous mammal: behavioural estimates compared with genetic paternity. Mol Ecol 8: 1199-1209.
12. Crow JF, Kimura M (1970). An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. Harper and Row: New York.
13. Dodds KG, Tate ML, McEwan JC, Crawford AM (1996). Exclusion probabilities for pedigree testing farm animals. Theor Appl Genet 92: 966-975.
14. Double MC, Cockburn A, Barry SC, Smouse PE (1997). Exclusion probabilities for single-locus paternity analysis when related males compete for matings. Mol Ecol 6: 1155-1166.
15. Emery AM, Wilson IJ, Craig S, Boyle PR, Noble LR (2001). Assignment of paternity groups without access to parental genotypes: multiple mating and developmental plasticity in squid. Mol Ecol 10: 1265-1278.
16. Epstein MP, Duren WL, Boehnke M (2000). Improved inference of relationship for pairs of individuals. Am J Hum Genet 67: 1219-1231.
17. Fung WK, Chung YK, Wong DM (2002). Power of exclusion revisited: probability of excluding relatives of the true father from paternity. Int J Legal Med 116: 64-67.
18. Garant D, Dodson JJ, Bernatchez L (2001). A genetic evaluation of mating system and determinants of individual reproductive success in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). J Hered 92: 137-145.
19. Gerber S, Mariette S, Streiff R, Bodenes C, Kremer A (2000). Comparison of microsatellites and amplified fragment length polymorphism markers for parentage analysis. Mol Ecol 9: 1037-1048.
20. Gosselin T, Sainte-Marie B, Bernatchez L (2005). Geographic variation of multiple paternity in the American lobster, Homarus americanus. Mol Ecol 14: 1517-1525.
21. Herbinger CM, Doyle RW, Pitman ER, Paquet D, Mesa KA et al. (1995). DNA fingerprint based analysis of paternal and maternal effects on offspring growth and survival in communally reared rainbow trout. Aquaculture 137: 245-256.
22. Hu YQ, Fung WK, Hu YQ (2005). Power of excluding an elder brother of a child from paternity. Forensic Sci Int 152: 321-322.
23. Hughes CR (1998). Integrating molecular techniques with field methods in studies of social behavior: a revolution results. Ecology 79: 383-399.
24. Jamieson A (1965). The genetics of transferrin in cattle. Heredity 20: 419-441.
25. Jamieson A, Taylor SCS (1997). Comparisons of three probability formulae for parentage exclusion. Anim Genet 28: 397-400.
26. Jones AG (2001). Gerud 1.0: a computer program for the reconstruction of parental genotypes from progeny arrays using multilocus DNA data. Mol Ecol Notes 1: 215-218.
27. Jones AG, Ardren WR (2003). Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations. Mol Ecol 12: 2511-2523.
28. Kichler K, Holder MT, Davis SK, Marquez R, Owens DW (1999). Detection of multiple paternity in the Kemp's ridley sea turtle with limited sampling. Mol Ecol 8: 819-830.
29. Madsen T, Ujvari B, Olsson M, Shine R (2005). Paternal alleles enhance female reproductive success in tropical pythons. Mol Ecol 14: 1783-1787.
30. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM (1998). Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol 7: 639-655.
31. McPeek MS, Sun L (2000). Statistical tests for detection of misspecified relationships by use of genome-screen data. Am J Hum Genet 66: 1076-1094.
32. Ohno Y, Sebetan IM, Akaishi S (1982). A simple method for calculating the probability of excluding paternity with any number of codominant alleles. Forensic Sci Int 19: 93-98.
33. Painter I (1997). Sibship reconstruction without parental information. J Agric Biol Env Stat 2: 212-229.
34. Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, Gil L (2005). Patterns of pollen dispersal in a small population of Pinus sylvestris L. revealed by total-exclusion paternity analysis. Heredity 94: 13-22.
35. Salmon DB, Brocteur J (1978). Probability of paternity exclusion when relatives are involved. Am J Hum Genet 30: 65-75.
36. Selvin S (1980). Probability of non-paternity determined by multiple allele codominant systems. Am J Hum Genet 32: 276-278.
37. Sieberts SK, Wijsman EM, Thompson EA (2002). Relationship inference from trios of individuals, in the presence of typing error. Am J Hum Genet 70: 170-180.
38. Smith BR, Herbinger CM, Merry HR (2001). Accurate partition of individuals into full-sib families from genetic data without parental information. Genetics 158: 1329-1338.
39. Thomas SC, Hill WG (2000). Estimating quantitative genetic parameters using sibships reconstructed from marker data. Genetics 155: 1961-1972.
40. Thomas SC, Hill WG (2002). Sibship reconstruction in hierarchical population structures using Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques. Genet Res 79: 227-234.
41. Thompson EA, Meagher TR (1987). Parental and sib likelihoods in genealogy reconstruction. Biometrics 43: 585-600.
42. Villanueva B, Verspoor E, Visscher PM (2002). Parental assignment in fish using microsatellite genetic markers with finite numbers of parents and offspring. Anim Genet 33: 33-41.
43. Wang JL (2004). Sibship reconstruction from genetic data with typing errors. Genetics 166: 1963-1979.
44. Wang JL (2006). Informativeness of genetic markers for pairwise relationship and relatedness inference. Theor Popul Biol 70: 300-321.
45. Weir BS (1996). Genetic Data Analysis II. Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA.
46. Wiener AS, Lederer M, Polayes SH (1930). Studies in isohemagglutination IV: on the chances of proving non-paternity: with special reference to blood groups. J Immunol 19: 259-282.
47. Wright S (1965). The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution 19: 395-420.