Male reproductive success and pedigree error in red spruce open-pollinated and polycross mating systems

Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 38, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 1742-1749

  Doerksen, T K ^a   Herbinger, C M ^a  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ERRORS; FOOD ADDITIVES; NUCLEIC ACIDS; ORGANIC ACIDS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; RAPID SOLIDIFICATION;

DNA MARKERS; GENETIC CORRELATIONS; GENETIC PARAMETERS; GENETIC VARIANCE; MICRO SATELLITES; POTENTIAL IMPACTS; PROGENY TESTS; RANDOM MATING; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SELFING; SIMPLE SEQUENCE REPEAT (SSR);

FORESTRY;

EVERGREEN TREE; HERITABILITY; MALE; POLLINATION; RECONSTRUCTION; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; TESTING METHOD;

ADDITIVES; ERRORS; ESTIMATION; FOOD; FORESTRY; NUCLEIC ACIDS; ORGANIC ACIDS; SOLIDIFICATION;

PICEA; PICEA RUBENS;

EID: 47649088102     PISSN: 00455067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/X08-025     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Adams, W.T., Neale, D.B., and Loopstra, C.A. 1988. Verifying controlled crosses in conifer tree improvement programs. Silvae Genet. 37: 147-152.
2. Aronen, T., Nikkanen, T., Harju, A., and Tiimonen, H. 2002. Pollen competition and seed-siring success in Picea abies. Theor. Appl. Genet. 104: 638-642. doi:10.1007/s00122-001-0789-9. PMID:12582668.
3. Blouin, M.S. 2003. DNA-based methods for pedigree reconstruction and kinship analysis in natural populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 503-511. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00225-8.
4. Bonin, A., Bellemain, E., Bronken Eidesen, P., Pompanon, F., Brochmann, C., and Taberlet, P. 2004. How to track and assess genotyping errors in population genetics studies. Mol. Ecol. 13: 3261-3273. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02346.x. PMID:15487987.
5. Burdon, R.D., and Shelbourne, C.J.A.. 1971. Breeding populations for recurrent selection: conflicts and possible solutions. N.Z. J. For. Sci. 1: 174-193.
6. Butler, K., Field, C., Herbinger, C.M., and Smith, B.R. 2004. Performance of four full-sib algorithms. Mol. Ecol. 13: 1589-1600. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02152.x. PMID:15140101.
7. Denti, D., and Schoen, D.J. 1988. Self-fertilization rates in white spruce: effect of pollen and seed production. J. Hered. 79: 284-288.
8. El-Kassaby, Y.A., and Ritland, K. 1992. Frequency-dependent male reproductive success in a polycross of Douglas fir. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83: 752-758. doi:10.1007/BF00226694.
9. Ericsson, T. 1999. The effect of pedigree error by misidentification of individual trees on genetic evaluation of a full-sib experiment. Silvae Genet. 48: 239-242.
10. Fowler, D.P. 1987. In defence of the polycross. Can. J. For. Res. 17: 1624-1627. doi:10.1139/x87-249.
11. Gerber, S., Mariette, S., Streiff, R., Bodenes, C., and Kremer, A. 2000. Comparison of microsatellites and amplified fragment length polymorphism markers for parentage analysis. Mol. Ecol. 9: 1037-1048. doi:10.1046/j.1365- 294x.2000.00961.x. PMID:10964223.
12. Herbinger, C.M., Gordos, K., and Allen, H. 2004. Tetranucleotide and dinucleotide microsatellite markers for spruce: challenges and progress. Abstract (P621) presented at Plant and Animal Genome XII, 10-14 January 2004, San Diego, Calif. Available from www.intl-pag.org/12/abstracts/P5i_PAG12_621. html [accessed 27 April 2008].
13. Hoffman, J.I., and Amos, W. 2005. Microsatellite genotyping errors: detection approaches, common sources and consequences for paternal exclusion. Mol. Ecol. 14: 599-612. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02419.x. PMID:15660949.
14. Hodgetts, R.B., Aleksiuk, M.A., Brown, A., Clarke, C., Macdonald, E., Nadeem, S., and Khasa, D. 2001. Development of microsatellite markers for white spruce (Picea glauca) and related species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 102: 1252-1258. doi:10.1007/s00122-001-0546-0.
15. Israel, C., and Weller, J.I.. 2000. Effect of misidentification on genetic gain and estimation of breeding value in dairy cattle populations. J. Dairy Sci. 83: 181-187.
16. Lambeth, C., Lee, B.-C., O'Malley, D., and Wheeler, N. 2001. Polymix breeding with parental analysis of progeny: an alternative to full-sib breeding and testing. Theor. Appl. Genet. 103: 930-943. doi:10.1007/s001220100627.
17. Marshall, T.C., Slate, J., Kruuk, L.E.B., and Pemberton, J.M. 1998. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 7: 639-655. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00374.x. PMID:9633105.
18. Moran, G.F., and Griffin, A.R. 1985. Non-random contribution of pollens in polycrosses of Pinus radiata D. Don. Silvae Genet. 34: 117-121.
19. R Development Core Team. 2007. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Available from http://www.R-project.org [accessed 27 August 2007].
20. Rajora, O.P., Rahman, M.H., Dayanandan, S., and Mosseler, A. 2001. Isolation, characterization, inheritance and linkage of microsattelite DNA markers in white spruce (Picea glauca) and their usefulness in other spruce species. Mol. Gen. Genet. 264: 871-882. PMID:11254135.
21. Rogers, D.L., and Boyle, T.J.B. 1991. Unequal paternal contributions in black spruce polycross seedlots. Heredity, 67: 373-379. doi:10.1038/hdy.1991.101.
22. Rungis, D., Berube, Y., Zhang, J., Ralph, S., Ritland, C.E., Ellis, B.E., Douglas, C., Hohlmann, J., and Ritland, K. 2004. Robust simple sequence repeat markers for spruce (Picea spp.) from expressed sequence tags. Theor. Appl. Genet. 109: 1283-1294. doi:10.1007/s00122-004-1742-5. PMID:15351929.
23. Schnabel, A., and Hamrick, J.L. 1995. Understanding the population genetic structure of Gleditsia triacanthos L.: the scale and pattern of pollen gene flow. Evolution, 49: 921-931. doi:10.2307/2410414.
24. Schoen, D.J., and Cheliak, W.M. 1987. Genetics of the polycross. 2. Male fertility variation in Norway spruce, Picea abies (L.) Karst. Theor. Appl. Genet. 74: 554-559. doi:10.1007/BF00288851.
25. Schoen, D.J., and Stewart, S.C. 1987. Variation in male fertilities and pairwise mating probabilities in Picea glauca. Genetics, 116: 141-152. PMID:17246377.
26. Skroppa, T., and Lindgren, D. 1994. Male fertility variation and non-random segregation in pollen mix crosses of Picea abies. For. Genet. 1: 13-22.
27. Sorensen, F.C., and White, T.L. 1988. Effect of natural inbreeding on variance structure in tests of wind-pollinated Douglas-fir progenies. For. Sci. 34: 102-118.
28. Squillance, A.E. 1974. Average genetic correlations among offspring from open-pollinated forest trees. Silvae Genet. 23: 149-156.
29. Thomas, S.C., and Hill, W.G. 2002. Sibship reconstruction in hierarchical population structures using Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques. Genet. Res. 79: 227-234. doi:10.1017/S0016672302005669. PMID:12220130.
30. Wang, J. 2004. Sibship reconstruction from genetic data with typing errors. Genetics, 166: 1963-1979. doi:10.1534/genetics.166.4.1963. PMID:15126412.
31. Wiselogel, A.E., and van Buijtenen, J.P. 1988. Probability of equal mating in polymix pollinations of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Silvae Genet. 37: 184-187.
32. Xie, C.Y., and Knowles, P. 1992. Male fertility variation in an open-pollinated plantation of Norway spruce (Picea abies). Can. J. For. Res. 22: 1463-1468. doi:10.1139/x92-196.