Mean-field approximations for coupled populations of generalized linear model spiking neurons with markov refractoriness

Neural Computation

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1203-1243

  Toyoizumi, Taro ^a   Rad, Kamiar Rahnama ^a   Paninski, Liam ^a  

^a Howard Hughes Medical Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; NERVE CELL; NERVE CELL NETWORK; PHYSIOLOGY; PROBABILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL; TIME;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; LINEAR MODELS; MARKOV CHAINS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NERVE NET; NEURONS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 70349239144     PISSN: 08997667     EISSN: 1530888X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/neco.2008.04-08-757     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Amit, D. J., & Tsodyks, M. V. (1991). Quantitative study of attractor neural networks retrieving at low spike rates. I: Substrate-spikes, rates, and neuronal gain. Network, 2, 259-273.
2. Berry, M., & Meister, M. (1998). Refractoriness and neural precision. J. Neurosci., 18, 2200-2211.
3. Brillinger, D. (1988). Maximum likelihood analysis of spike trains of interacting nerve cells. Biological Cyberkinetics, 59, 189-200.
4. Brown, E., Kass, R., & Mitra, P. (2004). Multiple neural spike train data analysis: State-of-the-art and future challenges. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 456-461.
5. Brunel, N., & Hakim, V. (1999). Fast global oscillations in networks of integrate- and-fire neurons with low firing rates. Neural Comput., 11, 1621-1671.
6. Bryant, H., & Segundo, J. (1976). Spike initiation by transmembrane current: A white-noise analysis. Journal of Physiology, 260, 279-314.
7. Chizhov, A. V., & Graham, L. J. (2007). Population model of hippocampal pyramidal neurons, linking a refractory density approach to conductance-based neurons. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys., 75, 011924.
8. Chornoboy, E., Schramm, L., & Karr, A. (1988). Maximum likelihood identification of neural point process systems. Biological Cybernetics, 59, 265-275.
9. Derrida, B., Gardner, E., & Zippelius, A. (1987). An exactly solvable asymmetric neural network model. Europhys. Lett., 4, 167-173.
10. Doiron, B., Lindner, B., Longtin, A., Maler, L., & Bastian, J. (2004). Oscillatory activity in electrosensory neurons increases with the spatial correlation of the stochastic input stimulus. Phys.Rev.Lett., 93(4), 048101.
11. Escola, S., & Paninski, L. (2007). Hidden Markov models applied toward the inference of neural states and the improved estimation of linear receptive fields. Manuscript submitted for publication.
12. Fourcaud-Trocme, N., & Brunel, N. (2005). Dynamics of the instantaneous firing rate in response to changes in input statistics. J. Comput. Neurosci., 18, 311-321.
13. Fourcaud-Trocme, N., Hansel, D., van Vreeswijk, C., & Brunel, N. (2003). How spike generation mechanisms determine the neuronal response to fluctuating inputs. J. Neurosci., 23, 11628-11640.
14. Gerstner, W., & Kistler, W. (2002). Spiking neuron models: Single neurons, populations, plasticity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Ginzburg, I., & Sompolinsky, H. (1994). Theory of correlations in stochastic neural networks. Phys.Rev.E, 50(4), 3171-3191.
16. Harris, K., Csicsvari, J., Hirase, H., Dragoi, G., & Buzsaki, G. (2003). Organization of cell assemblies in the hippocampus. Nature, 424, 552-556.
17. Hatsopoulos, N., Ojakangas, C., Paninski, L., & Donoghue, J. (1998). Information about movement direction obtained by synchronous activity of motor cortical neurons. PNAS, 95, 15706-15711.
18. Hertz, J., Krogh, A., & Palmer, R. G. (1991). Introduction to the theory of neural computation. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley.
19. Kappen, H. J., & Spanjers, J. J. (2000). Mean field theory for asymmetric neural networks. Phys.Rev.E, 61(5 Pt B), 5658-5663.
20. Kass, R., & Ventura, V. (2001). A spike-train probability model. Neural Comput., 13, 1713-1720.
21. Keat, J., Reinagel, P., Reid, R., & Meister, M. (2001). Predicting every spike: A model for the responses of visual neurons. Neuron, 30, 803-817.
22. Knight, B., Omurtag, A., & Sirovich, L. (2000). The approach of a neuron population firing rate to a new equilibrium: An exact theoretical result. Neural Comput., 12, 1045-1055.
23. Kohn, A., & Smith, M. (2005). Stimulus dependence of neuronal correlation in primary visual cortex of the macaque. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 3661-3673.
24. Kulkarni, J., & Paninski, L. (2007). Common-input models for multiple neural spike-train data. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 18, 375-407.
25. Lindner, B., Doiron, B., & Longtin, A. (2005). Theory of oscillatory firing induced by spatially correlated noise and delayed inhibitory feedback. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys., 72(6 Pt 1), 061919.
26. Marmarelis, P., & Marmarelis, V. (1978). Analysis of physiological systems: The white-noise approach. New York: Plenum Press.
27. Martignon, L., Deco, G., Laskey, K., Diamond, M., Freiwald, W., & Vaadia, E. (2000). Neural coding: Higher-order temporal patterns in the neurostatistics of cell assemblies. Neural Comput., 12, 2621-2653.
28. Mattia, M., & Del Giudice, P. (2002). Population dynamics of interacting spiking neurons. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys., 66, 051917.
29. Meyer, C., & van Vreeswijk, C. (2002). Temporal correlations in stochastic networks of spiking neurons. Neural Comput., 14, 369-404.
30. Moreno-Bote, R., & Parga, N. (2004). Role of synaptic filtering on the firing response of simple model neurons. Phys.Rev.Lett., 92, 028102.
31. Moreno-Bote, R., & Parga, N. (2006). Auto- and cross-correlograms for the spike response of leaky integrate-and-fire neurons with slow synapses. Phys.Rev.Lett., 96, 028101.
32. Nirenberg, S., Carcieri, S., Jacobs, A., & Latham, P. (2002). Retinal ganglion cells act largely as independent encoders. Nature, 411, 698-701.
33. Nykamp, D. (2007). A mathematical framework for inferring connectivity in probabilistic neuronal networks. Math. Biosci., 205, 204-251.
34. Nykamp, D., & Tranchina, D. (2000). A population density approach that facilitates large-scale modeling of neural networks: Analysis and an application to orientation tuning. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 8, 19-50.
35. Okatan, M., Wilson, M., & Brown, E. (2005). Analyzing functional connectivity using a network likelihood model of ensemble neural spiking activity. Neural Comput., 17, 1927-1961.
36. Oksendal, B. (2002). Stochastic differential equations. Berlin: Springer.
37. Oram, M., Hatsopoulos, N., Richmond, B., & Donoghue, J. (2001). Excess synchrony in motor cortical neurons provides redundant direction information with that from coarse temporal measures. Journal of Neurophysiology, 86, 1700-1716.
38. Paninski, L. (2004). Maximum likelihood estimation of cascade point-process neural encoding models. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 15, 243-262.
39. Paninski, L., Fellows, M., Shoham, S., Hatsopoulos, N., & Donoghue, J. (2004). Superlinear population encoding of dynamic hand trajectory in primary motor cortex. J. Neurosci., 24, 8551-8561.
40. Paninski, L., Pillow, J., & Lewi, J. (2007). Statistical models for neural encoding, decoding, and optimal stimulus design. In P. Cisek, T. Drew, & J. Kalaska (Eds.), Computational neuroscience: Progress in brain research. Dordrecht: Elsevier.
41. Pillow, J., Paninski, L., Uzzell, V., Simoncelli, E., & Chichilnisky, E. (2005). Prediction and decoding of retinal ganglion cell responses with a probabilistic spiking model. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 11003-11013.
42. Pillow, J. W., Shlens, J., Paninski, L., Sher, A., Litke, A. M., & Chichilnisky, et al. (2008). Spatio-temporal correlations and visual signalling in a complete neuronal population. Nature, 454, 995-999.
43. Renart, A., Brunel, N., & Wang, X.-J. (2003). Computational neuroscience: A comprehensive approach. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
44. Riehle, A., Grün, S., Diesmann, M., & Aertsen, A. (1997). Spike synchronization and rate modulation differentially involved in motor cortical function. Science, 278, 1950-1953.
45. Rieke, F., Warland, D., de Ruyter van Steveninck, R., & Bialek, W. (1997). Spikes: Exploring the neural code. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. Rigat, F., de Gunst, M., & van Pelt, J. (2006). Bayesian modelling and analysis of spatio-temporal neuronal networks. Bayesian Analysis, 1, 733-764.
47. Schnitzer, M., & Meister, M. (2003). Multineuronal firing patterns in the signal from eye to brain. Neuron, 37, 499-511.
48. Shriki, O., Hansel, D., & Sompolinsky, H. (2003). Rate models for conductance-based cortical neuronal networks. Neural Comput., 15, 1809-1841.
49. Snyder, D., & Miller, M. (1991). Random point processes in time and space. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
50. Sompolinksy, H., Crisanti, A., & Sommers, H. (1988). Chaos in random neural networks. Physical Review Letters, 61, 259-262.
51. Toyoizumi, T., Aihara, K., & Amari, S. (2006). Fisher information for spike-based population decoding. Phys. Rev. Lett., 97, 098102.
52. Truccolo, W., Eden, U., Fellows, M., Donoghue, J., & Brown, E. (2005). A point process framework for relating neural spiking activity to spiking history, neural ensemble and extrinsic covariate effects. Journal of Neurophysiology, 93, 1074-1089.
53. van Vreeswijk, C., & Sompolinsky, H. (1996). Chaos in neuronal networks with balanced excitatory and inhibitory activity. Science, 274, 1724-1726.
54. van Vreeswijk, C., & Sompolinsky, H. (1998). Chaotic balanced state in a model of cortical circuits. Neural Comput., 10, 1321-1371.
55. Wilson, H. R., & Cowan, J. D. (1972). Excitatory and inhibitory interactions in localized populations of model neurons. Biophys. J., 12(1), 1-24.