Robotic implementation of biological bayesian models towards visuo-inertial image stabilization and gaze control

2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, ROBIO 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 443-448

  Lobo, Jorge ^a   Ferreira, João Filipe ^a   Dias, Jorge ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; BIOMIMETICS; IMAGE PROCESSING; INFERENCE ENGINES; STABILIZATION;

BAYESIAN INFERENCE; BIOMIMETIC APPROACHES; IMAGE STABILIZATION; PSYCHOPHYSICAL; PSYCHOPHYSICAL STUDIES; ROBOTIC IMPLEMENTATION; SENSING MODALITIES; VISUAL SENSING;

ROBOTICS;

EID: 70349187985     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ROBIO.2009.4913044     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. H. Carpenter. Movements of the Eyes. London Pion Limited, 2nd edition, 1988. ISBN 0-85086-109-8.
2. Alain Berthoz. The Brain's Sense of Movement. Havard University Press, 2000. ISBN: 0-674-80109-1.
3. Peter Corke, Jorge Lobo, and Jorge Dias. An introduction to inertial and visual sensing. The International Journal of Robotics Research (IJRR) Special Issue from the 2nd Workshop on Integration of Vision and Inertial Sensors., 26(6):519-535, June 2007.
4. Jorge Lobo and Jorge Dias. Vision and inertial sensor cooperation using gravity as a vertical reference. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 25(12):1597-1608, December 2003.
5. David C. Knill and Alexandre Pouget. The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation. TRENDS in Neurosciences, 27(12):712-719, December 2004.
6. Yair Weiss, Eero P. Simoncelli, and Edward H. Adelson. Motion illusions as optimal percepts. Nature Neuroscience, 5(6):598-604, 2002.
7. Wilson S. Geisler and Daniel Kersten. Illusions, perception and Bayes. Nature Neuroscience, 5(6):508-510, June 2002.
8. Francis Colas, Julien Diard, and Pierre Bessire. Common Bayesian Models For Common Cognitive Issues. Bacs deliverable 3.1: Review report of bayesian approaches to fusion multimodality, conflicts, ambiguities, hierarchies and loops, Bayesian Approach to Cognitive Systems (IP FP6-IST-027140), January, 11th 2007.
9. Francesco Panerai and Giulio Sandini. Oculo-motor stabilization reflexes: integration of inertial and visual information. Neural Networks, 11(7-8):1191-1204, October 1998.
10. Francesco Panerai, Giorgio Metta, and Giulio Sandini. Visuo-inertial stabilization in space-variant binocular systems. Robotics and Au-tonomous Systems, 30(1-2):195-214, January 2000.
11. F. Panerai, G. Metta, and G. Sandini. Learning visual stabilization reflexes in robots with moving eyes. Neurocomputing, 48(1-4):323-337, October 2002.
12. Stephane Viollet and Nicolas Franceschini. A high speed gaze control system based on the vestibulo-ocular reflex. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 50(4):147-161, March 2005.
13. Karl Pauwels, Markus Lappe, and Marc M. Van Hulle. Fixation as a mechanism for stabilization of short image sequences. International Journal of Computer Vision, V72(1):67-78, April 2007.
14. Kikuro Fukushima. Corticovestibular interactions: anatomy, electrophysiology, and functional considerations. Experimental Brain Research, 117(1):1-16, October 1997.
15. Susan Hurley. Perception and action: Alternative views. Synthese, 129(1):3-40, October 2001.
16. Gilles Leone. The effect of gravity on human recognition of disoriented objects. Brain Research Reviews, 28(1-2):203-214, November 1998.
17. D E Angelaki, M Q McHenry, J D Dickman, S D Newlands, and B J Hess. Computation of inertial motion: neural strategies to resolve ambiguous otolith information. The Journal Of Neuroscience: The Official Journal Of The Society For Neuroscience, 19(1):316-327, January 1999.
18. Laurence R. Harris, Michael Jenkin, and Daniel C. Zikovitz. Visual and non-visual cues in the perception of linear self motion. Experimental Brain Research, 135(1):12-21, October 2000.
19. Gilles Reymond, Jacques Droulez, and Andras Kemeny. Visuovestibular perception of self-motion modeled as a dynamic optimization process. Biological Cybernetics, 87(4):301-314, October 2002.
20. Jonathan W. Kelly, Jack M. Loomis, and Andrew C. Beall. The importance of perceived relative motion in the control of posture. Experimental Brain Research, 161(3):285-292, March 2005.
21. Jeremy Beer, Colin Blakemore, Fred Previc, and Mario Liotti. Areas of the human brain activated by ambient visual motion, indicating three kinds of self-movement. Experimental Brain Research, 143(1):78-88, March 2002.
22. Fred H. Previc, Mario Liotti, Colin Blakemore, Jeremy Beer, and Peter Fox. Functional imaging of brain areas involved in the processing of coherent and incoherent wide field-of-view visual motion. Experimental Brain Research, 131(4):393-405, April 2000.
23. Jean Laurens and Jacques Droulez. Bayesian processing of vestibular information. Biological Cybernetics, 96(4):389-404, April 2007.
24. Peter Corke and M.C. Good. Dynamic effects in visual closed-loop systems. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 12(5):671-683, October 1996.
25. A. Pouget, P. Dayan, and R. Zemel. Information processing with population codes. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 1:125-132, 2000. Review.
26. John S. Zelek. Towards bayesian real-time optical flow. Image and Vision Computing, 22(12):1051-1069, October 2004.
27. Ted Camus. Real-Time Quantized Optical Flow. In IEEE Computer Architectures for Machine Perception, September 18-20 1995.
28. O. Lebeltel. Programmation Baysienne des Robots. PhD thesis, Institut National Polytechnique de Grenoble, Grenoble, France, September 1999.
29. Jorge Lobo and Jorge Dias. Relative pose calibration between visual and inertial sensors. The International Journal of Robotics Research (IJRR) Special Issue from the 2nd Workshop on Integration of Vision and Inertial Sensors., 26:561-577, 2007.