Development and performance usability testing of a theory-based, computerized, tailored intervention

CIN - Computers Informatics Nursing

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 288-298

  Ryan, Polly ^a   Pumilia, Nicholas J ^b   Henak, Brandon ^b   Chang, Tina ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

^b MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Syslogic Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INTERNET; METHODOLOGY; MICROCOMPUTER; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING EDUCATION; OSTEOPOROSIS;

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; COMPUTER LITERACY; COMPUTERS, HANDHELD; EDUCATION, NURSING, CONTINUING; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMANS; INTERNET; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOPOROSIS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 70349125022     PISSN: 15382931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e3181b21779     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Putnam J. Bowling alone: Americas declining social capital. J Democr. 1995;6(1):65.
2. Kawachi I, Kennedy BP. The Health of Nations: Why Inequality Is Harmful to Your Health. New York, NY: New York Press; 2002.
3. Bull FC, Holt CL, Kreuter MW, Clark EM, Scharff D. Understanding the effects of printed health education materials: which features lead to which outcomes? J Health Commun. 2001;6(3): 265-279.
4. McRoy SW, Liu-Perez A, Ali SS. Interactive computerized health care education. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998;5(4):347-354.
5. Rector C. An integrative review of computer-based simulation in the education process. Comput Inform Nurs. 2002;20(5):203-211.
6. Revere D, Dunbar PJ. Review of computer-generated outpatient health behavior interventions: clinical encounters "in absentia". J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001;8(1):62-79.
7. Carroll JM, Rosson MB. Paradox of the active user. In: Carroll JM, ed. Interfacing Thought: Cognitive Aspects of Human-Computer Interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1987:80-111.
8. Nielsen J. Usability as a barrier to entry. http://www.useit.cim/ alertbox/991128.html. Accessed June 23, 2006.
9. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HSDHHS). Usability Gov: A Guide for Developing & Useful Web Sites. Designing educational booklets for the Web. In: Services DoHaH, ed. Usability: FirstGov.gov. www.usability.gov. Accessed July 13, 2009.
10. Ammenwerth E, Iller C, Mahler C. It-adoption and the interaction of task, technology and individuals: a fit framework and a case study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006;6:3.
11. Bailey B. Navigation: left is best. http://usability.gov/pubs/040106news. html. Accessed June 23, 2006.
12. Hesse BW, Shneiderman B. eHealth research from the user's perspective. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32(58):s97-s103.
13. Johnson CW. Why did that happen? Exploring the proliferation of barely usable software in healthcare systems. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007;15(S1):i76-i81.
14. Shekelle PG, Morton SC, Keeler EB. Costs and Benefits of Health Information Technology: Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 132. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2006. Publication no. 06-E006.
15. Kools M. A focus on the usability of health education materials. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;65:275-276.
16. Whittemore R, Grey M. The systematic development of nursing interventions. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2002;34(2):115-120.
17. Campbell M, Firzpatrick R, Haines A, et al. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ. 2000;321(16):694- 696.
18. Karsh B-T. Beyond usability: designing effective technology implementation systems to promote patient safety. Quality Saf Health Care. 2004;13:388-394.
19. Ryan P. Integrated theory of health behavior change: background and intervention development. Internet J Adv Nurs Pract. 2008; 23(3):161-170.
20. Staggers N, Thomas CR, Happ B. An operational model for patient-centered informatics. Comput Nurs. 1999;17(6):278-285.
21. Baker L, Bundorf K, Royalty A, Galvin C, McDonald K. Consumer-Oriented Strategies for Improving Health Benefit Design: An Overview. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2007. Publication no. 07-0067.
22. Dollarhide AW, Rutledge T, Weinger MD, Dresselhaus TR. Use of a handheld computer application for voluntary medication event reporting by inpatient nurses and physicians. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;23(4):418-422.
23. Farrell MJ, Rose L. Use of mobile handheld computers in clinical nursing education. J Nurs Educ. 2008;47(1):13-19.
24. Kuiper R. Use of personal digital assistants to support clinical reasoning in undergraduate baccalaureate nursing students. Comput Inform Nurs. 2008;2:90-98.
25. McGowan JJ. The pervasiveness of telemedicine: adoption with or without a research base. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(4):505-507.
26. Koyanl SJ, Bailey RW, Nall JR, et al. Research-Based Web Design & Usability Guidelines. Bethesda, MD: AHRQ. NIH publication 03-5424; 2003.
27. Ryan P, Lauver DR. The efficacy of tailored interventions. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2002;34(4):331-337.
28. Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy. NIH Consensus Statement. Bethesda, MD: NIH. 2000;17(1):1-45.
29. King AC, Ahn DK, Oliveria BM, Atienza AA, Castro CM, Gardner CD. Promoting physical activity through hand-held computer technology. Am J Prev Med. 2008;34(2):138-142.
30. Wilkinson SA, Miller YD. Improving health behaviours during pregnancy: a new direction for the pregnancy handheld record. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;47:464-467.
31. Wing RR, Tate DF, Gorin AA, Raynor HA, Fava JL. A self-regulation program for maintenance of weight loss. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(15):1563-1571.
32. Bailey B. The value of iterative design. http://search2.hhs.gov/ pubs/072005news.html. Accessed June 23, 2006.
33. Chaput S, Weiss M. The ROI of usability. http://www.userthink. com/content/roi-content.html. Accessed June 23, 2006.
34. UHDDS. Usability basics. http://www.usability.gov/basics/index. html. Accessed June 23, 2006.
35. Staggers N. Human-computer interaction in health care organizations. In: Englebardt SP, Nelson R, eds. Health Care Informatics: An Interdisciplinary Approach. St Louis, MO: Mosby; 2002:321-345.
36. Armbruster C, Sutter C, Ziefle M. Notebook input devices put to the age test: the usability of trackpoint and touchpad for middle-aged adults. Ergonomics. 2007;50(3):426-445.
37. Eakin B, Brady JS, Lusk SL. Creating a tailored, multimedia, computer-based intervention. Comput Inform Nurs. 2001;119(4): 152-160.
38. Edwards SL, Slattery ML, Murtaugh MA, et al. Development and use of touch-screen audio computer-assisted self-interviewing in a study of American Indians. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165(11):1336-1342.
39. Farzanfar R, Finkelstein J, Friedman RH. Testing the usability of two automated home-based patient-management systems. J Med Syst. 2004;28(2):143-153.
40. Pearce GF, Williamson J, Harrell JS, Wildemuth BM, Solomon P. The children's computerized physical activity reporter: children as partners in the design and usability evaluation of an application for self-reporting physical activity. Comput Inform Nurs. 2007; 25(2):93-105.
41. Boissy P, Jacobs K, Roy SH. Usability of a barcode scanning system as a means of data entry on a PDA for self-report health outcome questionnaires: a pilot study in individuals over 60 years of age. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006;6:6-42.
42. Eslami S, Abu-Hanna A, de Keizer NF. Evaluation of outpatient computerized physician medication order entry system: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14:400-406.
43. Koivunen M, Valimaki M, Pitkanen A. A preliminary usability evaluation of Web-based portal application for patients with schizophrenia. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2007;14:462-469.
44. Monsieurs KG, Vogels C, Bossaert LL, Meert P, Calle PA. A study comparing the usability of fully automatic versus semi-automatic defibrillation by untrained nursing students. Resuscitation. 2005;64: 41-47.
45. Treadwell I. The usability of personal digital assistants (PDAs) for assessment of practical performance. Med Educ. 2006;40:855-861.
46. Chen Y-C, Chiu H-C, Tsai M-D, Chang H, Chong C-F. Development of a personal digital assistant-based wireless application in clinical practice. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2007;85: 181-184.
47. Effken JA, Doyle M. Interface design and cognitive style in learning an instructional computer simulation. Comput Inform Nurs. 2001;19(4):164-171.
48. Beuscart-Zephir MC, Brender J, Beuscart R, Menager-Depriester I. Cognitive evaluation: how to assess the usability of information technology in healthcare. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1997;54:19-28.
49. Stinson JN, Petroz GC, Tait G, et al. e-Ouch: usability testing of an electronic chronic pain diary for adolescents with arthritis. Clin J Pain. 2006;22(3):295-305.
50. Rees M, Dineschandra J. Monitoring clinical performance: the role of software architecture. Health Care Manag Sci. 2005;8:197-203.
51. Ling J, vanSchaik P. The effects of link format and screen location on visual search of Web pages. Ergonomics. 2004;22:907-921.
52. Beuscart-Zephir MC, Watbled L, Carpentier AM, Degroisse M, Alao O. A rapid usability assessment methodology to support the choice of clinical information systems: a case study. In: American Medical Informatics Association 2002 Annual Symposium Proceedings. 2002:46-50. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov. Accessed July 13, 2009.
53. Rubin J. The Handbook of Usability Testing: How to Plan, Design, and Conduct Effective Tests. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1994.
54. Fonda SJ, Paulsen CA, Perkins J, Kedziora RJ, Rodbard D, Bursell S-E. Usability test of an Internet-based informatics tool for diabetes care providers: the comprehensive diabetes management program. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2007;10(1):16-24.
55. Neufeld A, Harrison MJ, Rempel GR, et al. Practical issues in using a card sort in a study of nonsupport and family caregiving. Qual Health Res. 2004;14(10):1418-1428.
56. Nielsen J. Why you only need to test with 5 users.