Intermethod reliability of real-time versus delayed videotaped evaluation of a high-fidelity medical simulation septic shock scenario

Academic Emergency Medicine

Volumn 16, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 887-893

  Williams, Justin B ^a   McDonough, Marie A ^b   Hilliard, Michael W ^a   Williams, Annette L ^a   Cuniowski, Peter C ^a   Gonzalez, Michael G ^a  

^a SAN ANTONIO MILITARY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium   (United States)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Medical simulation; Sepsis; Shock

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; CRONBACH ALPHA COEFFICIENT; EVALUATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RELIABILITY; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; SEPTIC SHOCK; SIMULATION; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; TRAINING; VIDEOTAPE;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; EMERGENCY MEDICINE; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SHOCK, SEPTIC; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; TIME FACTORS; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING;

EID: 70149120721     PISSN: 10696563     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00505.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Rosen MA, Salas E, Silvestri S, Wu TS, Lazzara EH. A measurement tool for simulation-based training in emergency medicine: the simulation module for assessment of resident targeted event responses (SMARTER) approach. Simul Healthc. 2008; 3:170-179
2. Boulet JR, Murray D, Kras J, Woodhouse J. Setting performance standards for mannequin-based acute-care scenarios: an examinee-centered approach. Simul Healthc. 2008; 3:72-81.
3. Haan CK, Edwards FH, Poole B, Godley M, Genuardi FJ, Zenni EA. A model to begin to use clinical outcomes in medical education. Acad Med. 2008; 83:574-580
4. Bond WF, Spillane LL. The use of simulation for emergency medicine resident assessment. Acad Emerg Med. 2002; 9:1295-1299
5. Rogers PL, Jacob H, Thomas EA, Harwell M, Willenkin RL, Pinsky MR. Medical students can learn basic application, analytic, evaluative, and psychomotor skills of critical care medicine. Crit Care Med. 2000; 28:550-554
6. Gordon JA, Shaffer DW, Raemer DB, Pawlowski J, Hurford WE, Cooper JB. A randomized controlled trial of simulation-based teaching versus traditional instruction I medicine: a pilot study among clinical medical students. Adv Health Sci Ed. 2006; 11:33-39
7. Small SD, Wuerz RC, Simon R, Shapiro N, Conn A, Setnik G. Demonstration of high-fidelity simulation team training for emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 1999; 6:312-323
8. McFetrich J. A structured literature review on the use of high fidelity patient simulators for teaching in emergency medicine. Emerg Med J. 2006; 23:509-511
9. Vozenilek J, Huff JS, Reznek M, Gordon JA. See one, do one, teach one: advanced technology in medical education. Acad Emerg Med. 2004; 11:1149-1154
10. Overly FL, Sudikoff SN, Shapiro MJ. High-fidelity medical simulation as an assessment tool for pediatric residents' airway management skills. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007; 23:11-15
11. Brett-Fleegler MB, Vinci RJ, Weiner DL, Harris SK, Shih MC, Kleinman ME. A simulator-based tool that assesses pediatric resident resuscitation competency. Pediatrics. 2008; 121:e597-603.
12. Brucke M, Helm M, Schwartz A, Lampl L. Two rescuer resuscitation-mission impossible? A pilot study using a manikin setting. Resuscitation. 2007; 74:317-324
13. Kim J, Neilipovitz D, Cardinal P, Chiu M. A comparison of global rating scale and checklist scores in the validation of an evaluation tool to assess performance in the resuscitation of critically ill patients during simulated emergencies (abbreviated as "CRM simulator study IB"). Simul Healthc. 2009; 4:6-16.
14. Ringsted C, Lippert F, Hesselfeldt R, et al. Assessment of Advanced Life Support competence when combining different test methods-reliability and validity. Resuscitation. 2007; 75:153-160
15. Issenberg BS, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Gordon DL, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teacher. 2005; 27:10-28.
16. Ottestad E, Boulet JR, Lighthall GK. Evaluating the management of septic shock using patient simulation. Crit Care Med. 2007; 35:769-775
17. Ziv A, Rubin O, Moshinsky A, et al. MOR: a simulation-based assessment centre for evaluating the personal and interpersonal qualities of medical school candidates. Med Educ. 2008; 42:991-998
18. Bahl R, Murphy DJ, Strachan B. Qualitative analysis by interviews and video recordings to establish the components of a skilled low-cavity non-rotational vacuum delivery. BJOG. 2009; 116:319-326
19. von Wyl T, Zuercher M, Amsler F, Walter B, Ummenhofer W. Technical and non-technical skills can be reliably assessed during paramedic simulation training. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009; 53:121-127
20. Duncan JR, Kline B, Glaiberman CB. Analysis of simulated angiographic procedures. Part 2: extracting efficiency data from audio and video recordings. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007; 18:535-544
21. Kim J, Neilipovitz D, Cardinal P, Chiu M, Clinch J. A pilot study using high-fidelity simulation to formally evaluate performance in the resuscitation of critically ill patients: The University of Ottawa Critical Care Medicine, High-Fidelity Simulation, and Crisis Resource Management I Study. Crit Care Med. 2006; 34:2167-2174
22. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, et al., for the International Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med. 2008; 36:296-327.
23. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; i:307-310