Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women: A short version cochrane review

Neurourology and Urodynamics

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 472-480

  Lapitan, Marie Carmela M ^a   Cody, June D ^b   Grant, Adrian ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES MANILA   (Philippines)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cochrane review; Open retropubic colposuspension; Urinary incontinence; Women

Indexed keywords

CHOLINERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; COLLAGEN; OXYBUTYNIN;

CLINICAL TRIAL; COCHRANE LIBRARY; COLPOSUSPENSION; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CYSTOCELE; DRUG EFFICACY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MICTURITION DISORDER; MORBIDITY; OVERACTIVE BLADDER; PATIENT CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; REVIEW; SHORT COURSE THERAPY; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TENSION FREE VAGINAL TAPE; TREATMENT FAILURE; URGE INCONTINENCE; URINE INCONTINENCE; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

BIOFEEDBACK (PSYCHOLOGY); CHOLINERGIC ANTAGONISTS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION THERAPY; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECURRENCE; SUBURETHRAL SLINGS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY INCONTINENCE; URODYNAMICS; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

EID: 70049114751     PISSN: 07332467     EISSN: 15206777     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nau.20780     Document Type: Review

References (59)

1. Hunskaar S, Burgio K, Diokno AC, et al. Epidemiology and natural history of urinary incontinence (UI). In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A, editors. Incontinence: Second international consultation on incontinence. Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: The evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence. Paris, 1-3 July 2001. Plymouth, UK: Health Publication Ltd.; 2002. pp. 165-201.
2. Herzog AR, Flutz NH. Prevalence and, incidence of urinary incontinence in community-dwelling populations. J Am Geriatr Soc 1990;38:273-81 [MEDLINE: 90187638].
3. Glazener CMA, Cooper K. Anterior vaginal repair for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; Art. No.: CD001755. 10.1002/ 14651858.CD001755.
4. Bezerra CCB, Bruschini H, Cody JD. Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; Art. No.: CD001754. 10.1002/14651858.CD001754.pub2.
5. Glazener CMA, Cooper K. Bladder neck needle suspension for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; Art. No.: CD003636. 10.1002/14651858.CD003636.pub2.
6. Dean N, Ellis G, Herbison GP, et al. Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; Art. No.: CD002239. 10.1002/14651858.CD002239.pub2.
7. Keegan PE, Atiemo K, Cody JD, et al. Periurethral injection therapy for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; Art. No.: CD003881. 10.1002/14651858.CD003881.pub2.
8. Fantl JA, Newman DK, Colling J, et al. Urinary incontinence in adults: Acute and chronic management. Clinical practice guideline. No. 2, 1996 update. Rockville (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service, Agency; for; Health Care Policy and Research, 1996. Mar. AHCPR Publication No.: 96-0682. [Other: AHCPR Publication No. 96-0682].
9. Leach GE, Dmochowski RR, Appell RA, et al. Female Stress Urinary Incontinence Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence. The American Urological Association. J Urol 1997;158:875-80 [MEDLINE. 97402725].
10. Jarvis GJ. Surgery for genuine stress incontinence. Br J Obstetr Gynaecol 1994;101:371-4 [MEDLINE: 94289352].
11. Black NA, Downs SH. The effectiveness of surgery for stress incontinence in women: A systematic review. Br J Urol 1996;78:497-510 [MEDLINE: 97099937].
12. Lapitan MC, Cody JD, Grant A. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD002912. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002912.pub3.
13. Klarskov P, Belving D, Bischoff N, et al. Pelvic floor exercise versus surgery for female urinary stress incontinence. Urol Int 1986;41:129-32 [MEDLINE: 86263025].
14. Tapp AJS, Hills B, Cardozo L, et al. Randomised study comparing pelvic floor physiotherapy with the Burch colposuspension. Neurourol Urodyn 1989; 8:356-7.
15. Osman T. Stress incontinence surgery for patients presenting with mixed incontinence and a normal cystometrogram. BJU Int 2003;92:964-8 [Other: 16660].
16. Berglund AL, Lalos O. The pre- and postsurgical nursing of women with stress incontinence. J Adv Nurs 1996;23:502-11 [MEDLINE: 96237204].
17. Bergman A, Koonings PP, Ballard CA. Primary stress urinary incontinence and pelvic relaxation: Prospective randomized comparison of three different operations. Am J Obstetr Gynecol 1989;161:97-101 [MEDLINE: 89320578].
18. Bergman A, Ballard CA, Koonings PP. Comparison of three different surgical procedures for genuine stress incontinence: Prospective randomized study. Am J Obstetr Gynecol 1989;160:1102-6 [MEDLINE: 89270651].
19. Colombo M, Vitobello D, Proietti F, et al. Randomised comparison of Burch colposuspension versus anterior colporrhaphy in women with stress urinary incontinence and anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Br J Obstetr Gynaecol 2000; 107:544-51.
20. Holmes D, Stanton S, Chamberlain GVP. Randomised trial to compare the colposuspension with the anterior repair in the management of genuine stress incontinence. Personal communication, 1985.
21. Kammerer-Doak DN, Dorin MH, Rogers RG, et al. A randomized trial of Burch retropubic urethropexy and anterior colporrhaphy for stress urinary incontinence. Obstetr Gynecol 1999;93:75-8 [MEDLINE: 99113998].
22. Liapis A, Pyrgiotis E, Kontoravdis A, et al. Genuine stress incontinence: Prospective randomized comparison of two operative methods. Eur J Obstetr Gynecol Reprod Biol 1996;64:69-72 [MEDLINE: 96236657].
23. Quadri G, Scalambrino S, Boisio N, et al. Randomized surgery for incontinence and prolapse: Retropubic colposuspension vs anterior repair (Abstract). Arch Gynecol 1985;237:402.
24. Bai SW, Sohn WH, Chung DJ, et al. Comparison of the efficacy of Burch colposuspension, pubovaginal sling, and tension-free vaginal tape for stress urinary incontinence. Int J Gynaecol Obstetr 2005;91:246-51 [Other: 21260].
25. Drahoradova P, Masata J, Martan A, et al. Comparative development of quality of life between TVT and Burch colposuspension (Abstract). In: Proceedings of the International Continence Society (34th Annual Meeting) and the International UroGynecological Association, 23-27 August, 2004, Paris. 2004: Abstract number 278 [Other: 19049].
26. El Barky E, El Shazly A, El Wahab OA, et al. Tension free vaginal tape versus Burch colposuspension for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Int Urol Nephrol 2005;37:277-81 [Other: 20774].
27. Ward K, Hilton P. on behalf of the United Kingdom and Ireland Tension-Free Vaginal Tape Trial Group. Prospective multicentre randomised trial of tension-free vaginal tape and colposuspension as primary treatment for stress incontinence. BMJ 2002;325:67-73 [MEDLINE: 22109204].
28. Halaska M, Kolbl H, Petri E, et al. Preliminary results of a prospective randomized study comparing Burch colposuspension and tension-free vaginal tape - urodynamic and sexuological aspects (Abstract). Neurourol Urodyn 2001;20:421-2.
29. Han WHC. Burch colposuspension or tension-free vaginal tape for female stress urinary incontinence? (Abstract). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2001;12:S23.
30. Koelbl H, Halaska M, Ostermann S, et al. Burch colposuspension and TVT - Perioperative results of a prospective randomized trial in patients with genuine stress incontinence (Abstract). Neurourol Urodyn 2002;21:327 [Other: 14541].
31. Liapis A, Bakas P, Creatsas G. Burch colposuspension and tension-free vaginal tape in the management of stress urinary incontinence in women. Eur Urol 2002;41:469-73 [Other: 14229].
32. O'Sullivan S, Avery N, Balley A, et al. The effect of surgery on the collagen metabolism of paraurethral tissue in women with genuine stress incontinence (Abstract O10). Int Urogynaecol J 2000;11:S5.
33. Wang AC, Chen MC. Comparison of tension-free vaginal taping versus modified Burch colposuspension on urethral obstruction: A randomized controlled trial. Neurourol Urodyn 2003;22:185-90 [Other: 16021].
34. Sand PK, Winkler H, Blackhurst DW, et al. A prospective randomized study comparing modified Burch retropubic urethropexy and suburethral sling for treatment of genuine stress incontinence with low-pressure urethra. Am J Obstetr Gynecol 2000;182:30-4 [MEDLINE: 20114937].
35. Demirci F, Yucel O. Comparison of pubovaginal sling and Burch colposuspension procedures in type I/II genuine stress incontinence. Arch Gynecol Obstetr 2001;265:190-4 [Other: 13079].
36. Enzelsberger H, Helmer H, Schatten C. Comparison of Burch and lyodura sling procedures for repair of unsuccessful incontinence surgery. Obstetr Gynecol 1996;88:251-6 [MEDLINE: 96305278].
37. Albo ME, Richter HE, Brubaker L, et al. Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network. Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence [see comment]. N Engl J Med 2007;356:2143-55 [Other:25077].
38. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, et al. SF-36 Health survey manual and interpretation guide. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Centre; 1993.
39. Fischer JR, Hale DS, McClellan E, et al. The use of urethral electrodiagnosis to select the method of surgery in women with intrinsic sphincter deficiency (Abstract). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2001;12:S33.
40. Sculpher MJ, Ward KL, Hilton P. A comparison of the hospital cost of tension-free vaginal tape and colposuspension (Abstract). In: Proceedings of the International Continence Society (ICS), 30th Annual Meeting, 28-31 August, Tampere, Finland. 2000: pp. 333-4.
41. Athanassopoulos A, Barbalias G. Burch colposuspension versus Stamey endoscopic bladder neck suspension: A urodynamic appraisal. Urol Int 1996;56:23-7 MEDLINE: 97059229].
42. German KA, Kynaston H, Weight S, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing a modified needle suspension procedure with the vagina/ obturator shelf procedure for genuine stress incontinence. Br J Urol 1994; 74:188-90 [MEDLINE: 95006194].
43. Gilja I, Puskar D, Mazuran B, et al. Comparative analysis of bladder neck suspension using Raz, Burch and transvaginal Burch procedures. A 3-year randomized prospective study. Eur Urol 1998;33:298-302.
44. Mundy AR. A trial comparing the Stamey bladder neck suspension procedure with colposuspension for the treatment of stress incontinence. Br J Urol 1983;55:687-90 [MEDLINE: 84081277].
45. Palma PC, Soffiatti SA, Almeida SC, et al. Stress urinary incontinence: A comparative study of surgical treatment by the Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz technique with endoscopic suspension of the bladder neck. Second report. Asia Oceania J Obstetr Gynaecol 1988;14:31-6 [Other: 15461].
46. Ankardal M, Crafoord K, Ekerydh A, et al. Burch colposuspension by laparoscopic or abdominal approach: Report from a randomised study (Abstract 302). In: Proceedings of the International Continence Society (ICS), 31st Annual Meeting, 18-21 September, Seoul, Korea. 2001 [Other: 14383].
47. Burton G. A randomised comparison of laparoscopic and open colposuspension (Abstract). Neurourol Urodyn 1994;13:497-8.
48. Carey M, Rosamilia A, Maher C, et al. Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension: A prospective multi-centre randomised single-blind comparison (Abstract). Neurourol Urodyn 2000;19:389-91.
49. Fatthy H, El Hao M, Samaha I, et al. Modified Burch colposuspension: Laparoscopy versus laparotomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2001;8: 99-106.
50. Mak JHL, Cheon CW, Liu JYS, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and open colposuspension (Abstract). In: Proceedings of the Asian Society for Female Urology, 2nd Scientific Meeting, 26-27 August, Hong Kong. 2000: pp. 59-61. 2000
51. Morris AR, Reilly ETC, Hassan A, et al. 5-7 year follow-up of a randomised trial comparing laparoscopic colposuspension (LC) and open colposuspension (OC) in the treatment of genuine stress incontinence (Abstract). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2001;12:S6.
52. Kitchener HC, Dunn G, Lawton V, et al. COLPO Study Group. Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension-results of a prospective randomised controlled trial [see comment]. BJOG: Int J Obstetr Gynaecol 2006;113:1007-13 [Other: 22333].
53. Summitt RL, Lucente V, Karram MM, et al. Randomized comparison of laparoscopic and transabdominal Burch urethropexy for the treatment of genuine stress incontinence (Abstract). Obstetr Gynecol 2000;95:S2.
54. Su TH, Wang KG, Hsu CY, et al. Prospective comparison of laparoscopic and traditional colposuspensions in the treatment of genuine stress incontinence. Acta Obstetr Gynecol Scand 1997;76:576-82 [MEDLINE: 97389915].
55. Corcos J, Collet JP, Shapiro S, et al. Multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing surgery and collagen injections for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Urology 2005;65:898-904 [Other: 20346].
56. Colombo M, Scalambrino S, Maggioni A, et al. Burch colposuspension versus modified Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz urethropexy for primary genuine stress urinary incontinence: A prospective, randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstetr Gynecol 1994;171:1573-9 [MEDLINE: 95100324].
57. McCrery RJ, Thompson PK. Outcomes of urethropexy added to paravaginal defect repair: A randomized trial of Burch versus Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz. J Pelvic Med Surg 2005;11:137-43 [Other: 22982].
58. Quadri G, Magatti F, Belloni C, et al. Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz urethropexy and Burch colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence in women with low pressure and hypermobility of the urethra: Early results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstetr Gynecol 1999;181:12-8 [Other: 8864].
59. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 2001;357:1191-4.