Outcomes of urethropexy added to paravaginal defect repair: A randomized trial of Burch versus Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz

Journal of Pelvic Medicine and Surgery

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 137-143

  McCrery, Rebecca J ^a,c   Thompson, P K ^a,b  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Woman's Hospital of Texas   (United States)

^c Smith Tower ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Burch colposuspension; Burch urethropexy; Marshall Marchetti Krantz urethropexy; Paravaginal defect repair

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BURCH URETHROPEXY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLPOSUSPENSION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MARSHALL MARCHETTI KRANTZ URETHROPEXY; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STRESS INCONTINENCE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETHROPEXY; URODYNAMICS; VAGINA RECONSTRUCTION;

EID: 20444431148     PISSN: 15425983     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.spv.0000163003.31913.ce     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Lapitan MC, Cody DJ, Grant AM. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;1:CD002912.
2. Richardson AC, Lyon JB, Williams NL. A new look at pelvic relaxation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976;126:568-573.
3. Richardson AC, Edmonds PB, Williams NL. Treatment of stress urinary incontinence due to paravaginal fascial defect. Obstet Gynecol. 1981;57:357-362.
4. Shull BL, Baden WF. A six-year experience with paravaginal defect repair for stress urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;160:1432-1439; discussion 1439-1440.
5. Colombo M, Milani R, Vitobello D, et al. A randomized comparison of Burch colposuspension and abdominal paravaginal defect repair for female stress urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:78-84.
6. Thompson PK, Mooney RJ, Plummer A, et al. Paravaginal plus: a better incontinence operation? J Pelvic Surg. 1998;4:157-162.
7. Thompson PK, Mooney RJ, Plummer A, et al. Paravaginal plus. A better incontinence operation? Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1999;54:173-174.
8. Baden WF, Walker TA. Genesis of the vaginal profile: a correlated classification of vaginal relaxation. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1972;15:1048-1054.
9. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:10-17.
10. Lobel RW, Sand PK. The empty supine stress test as a predictor of intrinsic urethral sphincter dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88:128-132.
11. Macer GA. Transabdominal repair of cystocele, a 20 year experience, compared with the traditional vaginal approach. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978;131:203-207.
12. Milani R, Scalambrino S, Quadri G, et al. Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz procedure and Burch colposuspension in the surgical treatment of female urinary incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985;92:1050-1053.
13. Colombo M, Scalambrino S, Maggioni A, et al. Burch colposuspension versus modified Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz urethropexy for primary genuine stress urinary incontinence: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171:1573-1579.
14. Quadri G, Magatti F, Belloni C, et al. Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz urethropexy and Burch colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence in women with low pressure and hypermobility of the urethra: early results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181:12-18.
15. Thompson PK, Duff DS, Thayer PS. Stress incontinence in women under 50: does urodynamics improve surgical outcome? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2000;11:285-289.
16. Kjolhede P, Ryden G. Prognostic factors and longterm results of the Burch colposuspension. A retrospective study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1994;73:642-647.