Introduction: The role of objects in design co-operation: Communication through physical or virtual objects

Computer Supported Cooperative Work: CSCW: An International Journal

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 145-151

  Eckert, Claudia ^a   Boujut, Jean François ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b LABORATOIRE SOLS SOLIDES STRUCTURES   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS; VIRTUAL REALITY;

DESIGN CO-OPERATION; DESIGN COMMUNICATION; VIRTUAL OBJECTS;

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK;

EID: 0038129619     PISSN: 09259724     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1023954726209     Document Type: Editorial

References (16)

1. Bly, S.A. (1988): A Use of Drawing Surfaces in Different Collaborative Settings. Proceedings of Computer Supported Cooperative Work '88, Portland, OR. New York, NY: ACM Press, pp. 250-256.
2. Bly, S.A. and S.M. Minneman (1990): Commune: A Shared Drawing Surface. Proceedings of the Office Information Systems Conference. Boston, MA: ACM Press, pp. 184-193.
3. Bucciarelli, L.L. (1994): Designing Engineers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Eckert, C.M. (2001): The Communication Bottleneck in Knitwear Design: Analysis and Computing Solutions. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 10, pp. 29-74.
5. Eckert, C.M. and M.K. Stacey, (2000): Sources of Inspiration: a Language of Design. Design Studies, vol. 21, pp. 523-538.
6. Latour, B. (1987): Science in Action. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
7. Martin, G., F. Detienne and E. Lavigne (2001): Analysing Viewpoints in Design Through the Argumentation Process, INTERACT'2001, July 11-13, Tokyo.
8. Minneman, S.L. (1991): The Social Construction of a Technical Reality: Empirical Studies of Group Engineering Design Practice. PhD Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, Xerox Palo Alto Research Center report SSL-91-22.
9. Moran, T.P., W. van Melle and P. Chiu (1998): Tailorable Domain Objects as Meeting Tools for an Electronic Whiteboard. Proceedings of CSCW '98, Seattle, WA. New York, NY: ACM Press, pp. 295-304.
10. Neilson, I. and J. Lee (1994): Conversations with Graphics: Implications for the design of Natural Language/Graphics Interfaces. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 40, pp. 509-541.
11. Purcell, A.T. and J.S. Gero (1998): Drawings and the Design Process. Design Studies, vol. 19, pp. 389-430.
12. Schön, D.A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
13. Star, S.L. (1989): The Structure of Ill-Structured Solutions: Heterogeneous Problem-Solving, Boundary Objects, and Distributed Artificial Intelligence. In L. Gasser and M.N. Huhns (eds.): Distributed Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, Menlo Park, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 37-54.
14. Tang, J.C. (1989): Listing, Drawing, and Gesturing in Design: A Study of the Use of Shared Workspaces by Design Teams. PhD Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, Xerox Palo Alto Research Center report SSL-89-3
15. Tang, J.C. and S.L. Minneman (1990): VideoDraw: Video Interface for Collaborative Drawing. Proceedings of CHI'90. Seattle, WA: ACM Press, pp. 313-320.
16. Vinck, D. and A. Jeantet (1995): Mediating and Commissioning Objects in the Sociotechnical Process of Product Design: A Conceptual Approach. In D. Maclean, P. Saviotti and D. Vinck (eds.): Management and New Technology: Design, Networks and Strategy, COST Social Science Series. Bruxelles.