Stability of loaded and unloaded implants with different surfaces

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 289-298

  Nergiz, Ibrahim ^a   Arpak, Nejat ^b   Bostanci, Hamid ^b   Scorziello, Thomas M ^c   Schmage, Petra ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

^b ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c RUTGERS SCHOOL OF DENTAL MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Functional loading; Implant surfaces; Osseointegration; Torsional strength

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DEVICE REMOVAL; DOG; INSTRUMENTATION; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TORQUE; WEIGHT BEARING;

ANIMALS; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DEVICE REMOVAL; DOGS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MANDIBLE; OSSEOINTEGRATION; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TORQUE; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 69849115372     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Albrektsson T, Brȧnemark P-l, Hansson H-A, Lindström J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981;52:155-170.
2. Schenk R, Buser D. Osseointegration: A reality. Periodontology 2000 1998;17:22-35.
3. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B, Krol J. A histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies.Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:24-30.
4. Eckert SE, Choi YG, Sanchez AR, Koka S. Comparison of dental implant systems: Quality of clinical evidence and prediction of 5-year survival. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20: 406-415.
5. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Coulthard P, Worthington HV. A 5- year follow-up comparative analysis of the efficacy of various osseointegrated dental implant systems: A systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:557-568.
6. Gómez-Roman G, Schulte W, d'Hoedt B, Axmann-Krcmar D. The Frialit-2 implant system: Five-year clinical experience in single-tooth and immediately postextraction applications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:299-309.
7. McGlumphy, E, Peterson LJ, Larsen PE, Jeffcoat M. Prospective study of 429 hydroxyapatite-coated cylindric Omniloc implants placed in 121 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:82-92.
8. Perry J, Lenchewski E. Clinical performance and 5-year retrospective evaluation of Frialit-2-implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:887-891.
9. Karoussis I, Brägger U, Salvi GE, Bürgin W, Lang NP. Effect of implant design on survival and success rates of titanium oral implants: A 10-year prospective cohort study of the ITI Dental Implant System. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:8-17.
10. Turkyilmaz I, Avci M, Kuran S, Ozbek EN. A 4-year prospective clinical and radiographical study of maxillary dental implants supporting single-tooth crowns using early and delayed loading protocols. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2007;9:222-227.
11. Wennstrom JL, Ekestubbe A, Grondahl K, Karlsson S, Lindhe J. Implant-supported single-tooth restorations: A 5-year prospective study.J Clinical Periodontol 2005;32:567-574.
12. Mau J, Behneke A, Behneke N, et al. Randomized multicenter comparison of two coatings of intramobile cylinder implants in 313 partially edentulous mandibles followed up to 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:477-487.
13. Bornstein MM, Schmid B, Belser UC, Lussi A, Buser D. Early loading of non-submerged titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:631-638.
14. Vercaigne S, Wolke J, Naert I, Jamsem J. Bone healing capacity of titanium plasma-sprayed and hydroxylapatite-coated oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:261-271. (Pubitemid 128657999)
15. Gross KA, Berndt CC, Goldschlag DD, Lacono VJ. In vitro changes of hydroxyapatite coatings. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:589-597.
16. Ogiso M, Yamashita Y, Matsumoto T.The process of physical weakening and dissolution of the HA-coated implant in bone and soft tissue.J Dent Res 1998;77:1426-1434.
17. Zhu L, Ye X,.Tang G, et al. Biomimetic coating of compound titania and hydroxyapatite on titanium. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 2007;83:1165-1175.
18. Ramires P, Wennerberg A, Johansson C.Cosentino F, Tundo S, Milella E. Biological behavior of sol-gel coated dental implants. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2003;14:539-545.
19. Partenfelder U, Engel A, Rüssel C. A pyrolytic route for the formation of hydroxyapatite/fluorapatite solid solutions. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1993;4:292-295.
20. Li T, Lee J, Kobayashi T, Aoki H. Hydroxyapatite coating by dipping method, and bone bonding strength. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1996;7:355-357.
21. Schliephake H, Scharnweber D, Roessler S, Sewing A, Aref A. Biomimetic calcium phosphate composite coating of dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:738-746.
22. Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Lussi A, Higginbottom FL, Buser D. Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sand-blasted and acid-etched surface: A histometric study in the canine mandible.J Biomed Mater Res 1998;40: 1-11.
23. Murphy W. Clinical and experimental bone changes after intraosseous implantation. J Prosthet Dent 1995, 73:31-35.
24. Brunski JB. In vivo bone response to biomechanical loading at the bone/dental implant interface. Adv Dent Res 1999;13: 99-119.
25. Buser D, Nydegger T, Hirt HP, Cochran DL, Nolte LP. Removal torque values of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:611-619.
26. Klokkevold PR, Johnson P, Dadgostari S, Davies JE, Caputo A, Nishimura RD. Early endosseous integration enhanced by dual acid etching of titanium: A torque removal study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:350-357.
27. Meredith N. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:491-501.
28. Brȧnemark R. Osseointegration and mechanical capacity in bone tissue of varying quality. In: Brȧnemark PI, Gydevik BL, Skalak R (eds). Osseointegration in Skeletal Reconstruction and Joint Replacement. Chicago: Quintessence, 1994:101-109.
29. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Suggested guidelines for the topographic evaluation of implant surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:331-344.
30. Donath K, Breuner G. A method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissue. J Oral Pathol 1983;11:318-326.
31. Trisi P, Rao W. Bone classification: Clinical-histomorphometric comparison.Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10:1-7.
32. Nergiz I, Schmage P, Arpak N, Bostanci H, Niedermeier W, Platzer U. Influence of implant surface variations on the implant stability [abstract no. 3496]. J Dent Res 2004;83A.
33. Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Schmid B.Weigel C, et al. Does excessive occlusal load affect osseointegration? An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:259-268.
34. Gotfredsen K, Gotfredsen K, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Bone reactions adjacent to titanium implants subjected to static load of different duration. A study in the dog (III). Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:552-558. (Pubitemid 33721281)
35. Akin-Nergiz N, Nergiz I, Schulz A, Arpak N, Niedermeier W. Reactions of peri-implant tissues to continuous loading of osseointegrated implants. Am J Orthod 1998;114:292-298.
36. Knobloch L, Larsen PA, Rashid B, Carr AB. Six-month performance of implants with oxidized and machined surfaces restored at 2, 4, and 6 weeks postimplantation in adult beagle dogs. J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:350-356.
37. Neugebauer J,.Traini T, Thams U, Piatelli A, Zöller JE. Periimplant bone organization under immediate loading state. Circularly polarized light analysis: A minipig study. J Periodontol 2006;77:152-160.
38. Szmukler-Moncler S, Piattelli A, Favero GA, Dubruille J-H. Considerations preliminary to the application of early and immediate loading protocols in dental implantology.Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:12-25.
39. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Under E, Lang NP, Lindhe J. Early bone formation adjacent to rough and turned endosseous implant surfaces. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:381-392.
40. Novaes AB, De Oliveira RR, Muglia VA, Papalexiou VJaba M. The effects of interimplant distances on papilla formation and crestal resorption in implants with a Morse cone connection and a platform switch: A histomorphometric study in dogs. J Periodontol 2006;77:1839-1849.
41. Buser D, Nydegger T, OxIand T.et al. Interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: A biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;45:75-83.
42. Buser D. Effects of various titanium surface configurations on osseointegration and clinical implant stability. In: Lang N, Karring T, Lindhe J (eds). Proceedings of the 3rd European Workshop on Periodontology. Implant Dentistry. Berlin: Quintessence, 1999:88-101.
43. Cooper L, Masuda T, Whitson SW, Yliheikkila P, Felton DA. Formation of mineralizing osteoblast cultures on machined, titanium oxide grit-blasted, and plasma-sprayed titanium surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:37-47.
44. Sammons R, Lumbikanonda N, Gross M, Cantzler P. Comparison of osteoblast spreading on microstructured dental implant surfaces and cell behavior in an explant model of osseointegration. A scanning electron microscopic study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:657-666.
45. Di loria D, Traini T, Degidi M, Caputi S, Neugebauer J, Piatelli A. Quantitative evaluation of the fibrin clot extension on different implant surfaces: An in vitro study. J Biomed Mater Res 2005;74:636-642.
46. Rimondini L, Fare S, Brambilla E, et al.The effect of surface roughness on early in vivo plaque colonization on titanium. J Periodontol 1997;68:556-562.
47. Gröner-Schreiber B, Griepentrog M, Haustein I, et al. Plaque formation on surface modified dental implants. An in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:543-551.
48. Mombelli A. Prevention and therapy of peri-implant infections. In: Lang N, Karring T, Lindhe J (eds). Proceedings of the 3rd European Workshop on Periodontology. Implant Dentistry. Berlin: Quintessence, 1999:281-303.
49. Krafft T, Peschla M. Abrasion of surface components and endosseous implants depending on their shape and coating. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994;23:418-419.
50. Weingart D, Steinemann S, Schilli W, et al.Titanium deposition in regional lymph nodes after insertion of titanium screw implants in maxillofacial region. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994;23:450-452.
51. Klokkevold PR, Nishimura RD, Adachi M, Caputo A. Osseointegration enhanced by chemical etching of the titanium surface. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:442-447.
52. Marinho VC, Celletti R, Brachetti G, Petrone G, Minkin C, Piatelli A. Sandblasted and acid-etched implants: A histologic study in rats. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:75-81.
53. Krennmair G, Schmidinger S, Waldenberger O. ingle-tooth replacement with the Frialit-2 system: A retrospective clinical analysis of 146 implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002; 17:78-85.
54. Shalabi MM, Gortemaker A, van ten Hod MA, Jansen J A, Creugers NH. Implant surface roughness and bone healing: A systematic review. J Dent Res 2006;85:496-500.
55. Ricci G, Aimetti M, Stablum W, Guasti A. Crestal bone resorption 5 years after implant loading: Clinical and radiograph results with a 2-stage implant system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:597-602.
56. Artzi Z, Carmeli G, Kozlovsky A. A distinguishable observation between survival and success rate outcome of hydroxyap- atite-coated implants in 5-10 years in function. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:85-93.
57. Olsson M, Friberg B, Nilson H, Kultje C. Mkll - A modified self-tapping BrJnemark implant: 3-year results of a controlled prospective pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:15-21.
58. Mohammadi S, Esposito M, Hall J, Emanuelsson L.Thomsen P. Long-term bone response to titanium implants coated with thin radiofrequent magnetron-sputtered hydroxyapatite in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:498-509. (Pubitemid 39194174)