Recent progresses of land use and land cover change (lucc) models

Dili Xuebao/Acta Geographica Sinica

Volumn 64, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 456-468

  Huajun, Tang ^a   Wenbin, Wu ^b   Peng, Yang ^c   Youqi, Chen ^a   Peter, Verburg H ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF PLANT PROTECTION   (China)

^b AGRO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION INSTITUTE   (China)

^c WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Feedback; Function; Land use and land cover change (LUCC); Model; Scale; Spatio temporal pattern; Validation

Indexed keywords

FEEDBACK MECHANISM; LAND COVER; LAND USE CHANGE; LAND USE PLANNING; MODEL VALIDATION; NATURE-SOCIETY RELATIONS; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 69849088739     PISSN: 03755444     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (96)

1. GLP Science Plan and Implementation Strategy. IGBP Report No. 53/IHDP Report No. 19. IGBP Secretariat, Stockholm, 2005.
2. Foley J A, DeFries R, Asner G P et al. Global consequences of land use. Science, 2005, 309: 570-574.
3. Wu Wenbin, Yang Peng, Tang Huajun et al. Regional variability of effects of land use system on soil properties. Scientia Agriculture Sinica, 2007, 40(8):1697-1702. (Chines Sourse)
4. Liu J, Diamond J. China's environment in a globalizing world. Nature, 2005, 435: 1179-1186.
5. Yu Xingxiu, Yang Guishan, Wang Yao. Advances in researchers on environmental effects of land use/cover change. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2004, 24(5):627-633. (Chines Sourse)
6. Qin Lijie, Zhang Yu, Xu Hongmei et al. Study on the effect of land use change on the eco-environment. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2002, 22(4):508-512. (Chines Sourse)
7. Pielke Sr R A. Land use and climate change. Science, 2005, 310: 1625-1626.
8. Kalnay E, Cai M. Impact of urbanization and land-use change on climate. Nature, 2003, 423: 528-531.
9. Pimm S L, Raven P. Biodiversity: Extinction by numbers. Nature, 2000, 403: 843-845.
10. Tang Huajun, Chen Youqi, Qiu Jianjun et al. China Land-use and Land-cover Change. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2004. (Chines Sourse)
11. Chen Youqi, Yang Peng. Recent progresses of international study on land use and land cover change (LUCC). Economic Geography, 2001, 21(1):95-100. (Chines Sourse)
12. Lambin E F, Baulies X, Bockstael N et al. Land-Use and Land-Cover Change (LUCC) : Implementation Strategy. IGBP Report No. 48 and IHDP Report No. 10, International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme, International Human Dimension on Global Environment Change Programme, Stockholm Bonn, 1999.
13. Rindfuss R R, Walsh S J, Turner B L II et al. Developing a science of land change: Challenges and methodological issues. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 2004, 101: 13976-13981.
14. Turner B L II, Lambin E F, Reenberg A. The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 2007, 104: 20666-20671.
15. Lambin E F, Geist H J (eds). Land use and land cover change: Local processes and global impacts. Global Change-IGDP series, Springer Dordrecht, 2006.
16. Fang Chuanglin. Recent progress of studies on man-land relationship and its prospects in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2004, 59(suppl.):21-32. (Chines Sourse)
17. Li Xiubin. A review of the international researches on land use/land cover change. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1996, 51(6):553-558. (Chines Sourse)
18. Huang Qiuhao, Cai Yunlong. Review on several domestic land use change models. China Land Science, 2005, 19(5):25-30. (Chines Sourse)
19. Zhang Hua, Zhang Bo. Review on land use and land cover change models. Journal of Natural Resources, 2005, 20(3):422-431. (Chines Sourse)
20. Heistermann M, Muller C, Ronneberge K. Land in sight? Achievements, deficits and potentials of continental to global scale land-use modeling. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2006, 114: 141-158.
21. Pontius J R G, Schneider L C. Land-cover change model validation by an ROC method for the Ipswich watershed, Massachusetts, USA. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2001, 85: 239-248.
22. Stéphenne N, Lambin E F. A dynamic simulation model of land-use changes in Sudano-Sahelian countries of Africa (SALU). Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2001, 85: 145-161.
23. He Chunyang, Shi Peijun, Li Jinggang et al. Scenarios simulation land use change in the northern China by system dynamic model. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2004, 59(4):599-608. (Chines Sourse)
24. Verburg P H, Soepboer W, Limpiada R et al. Modeling the spatial dynamics of regional land use: The CLUE-S model. Environmental Management, 2002, 30: 391-405.
25. Wu W, Yang P, Meng C et al. An integrated model to simulating sown area changes for major crops at a global scale. Science in China (Series D), 2008, 51: 370-379.
26. Verburg P H, Overmars K P, Huigen M G A et al. Analysis of the effects of land use change on protected areas in Phillippines. Applied Geography, 2006, 26: 153-173.
27. Verburg P H, De Nijs T C M, Van Eck J R et al. A method to analyze neighborhood characteristics of land use patterns. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2004, 28: 667-690.
28. Verburg P H, Rounsevell M D A, Veldkamp A. Scenario-based studies of future land use in Europe. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2006, 114: 1-6.
29. Kok K, Verburg P H, Veldkamp A. Integrated assessment of the land system: The future of land use. Land Use Policy, 2007, 24: 517-520.
30. Ewert F, Rounsevell M D A, Reginster I et al. Future scenarios of European agricultural land use: I. Estimating changes in crop productivity. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2005, 107: 101-116. (Pubitemid 40466207)
31. Rounsevell M D A, Ewert F, Reginster I et al. Future scenarios of European agricultural land use: II. Projecting changes in cropland and grassland. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2005, 107: 117-135. (Pubitemid 40466208)
32. Rounsevell M D A, Reginster I, Araujo M B et al. A coherent set of future land use change scenarios for Europe. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2006, 114: 57-68.
33. Westhoek H J, van den Berg M, Bakkes J A. Scenario development to explore the future of Europe's rural areas. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2006, 114: 7-20.
34. Audsley E, Pearn K R, Simota C et al. What can scenario modelling tell us about future European scale agricultural land use, and what not? Environmental Science and Policy, 2006, 9: 148-162.
35. Rounsevell M D A, Berry P M, Harrison P A. Future environmental change impacts on rural land use and biodiversity: a synthesis of the ACCELERATES project. Environmental Science and Policy, 2006, 9: 93-100.
36. Dockerty T, Lovett A, Appleton K et al. Developing scenarios and visualizations to illustrate potential policy and climatic influences on future agricultural landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2006, 114: 103-120.
37. Verburg P H, Schulp C J E, Veldkamp A. Downscaling of land use change scenarios to assess the dynamics of European landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2006, 114: 39-56.
38. Van Meijl H, van Rheenen T, Tabeau A et al. The impact of different policy environments on agricultural land use in Europe. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2006, 114: 21-38.
39. Fan Zemeng, Yue Tianxiang, Liu Jiyuan et al. Spatial and temporal distribution of land cover scenarios in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005, 60(6):941-952. (Chines Sourse)
40. Wang Shuang, He Chunyang, Pan Yaozhong et al. Research for scenarios simulation of urban land use change in Beijing by system dynamic model under water restriction from 2004 to 2020. Journal of Natural Resources, 2006, 21(4):535-544. (Chines Sourse)
41. Wu Wenbin, Yang Peng, Tan Guoxin et al. Global-scale modeling of future changes in sown areas for major crops based on a Logit model. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007, 62(6):589-598. (Chines Sourse)
42. Wu Wenbin, Yang Peng, Zhou Qingbo et al. Modeling sown area changes for major crops during 2005-2035 at global-scale. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2007, 23(10):93-97. (Chines Sourse)
43. Evans T P, Manire A, de Castro F et al. A dynamic model of household decision-making and parcel level land cover change in the eastern Amazon. Ecological Modelling, 2001, 143: 95-113.
44. Pontius J R G, Cornell J D, Hall CAS. Modeling the spatial pattern of land-use change with GEOMOD2: Application and validation for Costa Rica. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2001, 85: 191-203.
45. Goldstein N C, Candau J T, Clarker K C. Approaches to simulating the "March of bricks and mortar". Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2004, 28: 125-147.
46. Bü rgi M, Hersperger A M, Schneeberger N. Driving forces of landscape change-current and new directions. Landscape Ecology, 2004, 19: 857-868.
47. Verburg P H, Schot P P, Dijst M J et al. Land use change modelling: Current practice and research priorities. GeoJournal, 2004, 61: 309-324.
48. Li Xiubin. Explanation of land use change. Progress in Geography, 2002, 21(3):195-203. (Chines Sourse)
49. Verburg P H. Simulating feedbacks in land use and land cover change models. Landscape Ecology, 2006, 21: 1171-1183.
50. Liu J, Dietz T, Carpenter S R et al. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science, 2007, 317: 1513-1516.
51. Brown D G, Page S, Riolo R et al. Path dependence and the validation of agent-based spatial models of land use. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2005, 19: 153-174.
52. Shi Peijun, Wang Jing'ai, Chen Jing et al. The future of human-environmental interaction research in geography: Lessons from the 6th open meeting of IHDP. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2006, 61(2):115-126. (Chines Sourse)
53. Fischer G, Sun L. Model based analysis of future land-use development in China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2001, 85: 163-176.
54. Nute D, Potter W D, Maier F et al. NED-2: An agent-based decision support system for forest ecosystem management. Environmental Modelling and Software, 2004, 19: 831-843.
55. Matthews R. The People and Landscape Model (PALM) : Towards full integration of human decision-making and biophysical simulation models. Ecological Modelling, 2006, 194: 329-343.
56. Manson S M. Agent-based modeling and genetic programming for modeling land change in the southern Yucatan Peninsular Region of Mexico. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2005, 111: 47-62.
57. Barnaud C, Bousquet F, Trebuil G. Multi-agent simulations to explore rules for rural credit in a highland farming community of Northern Thailand. Ecological Economics, 2008, 66: 615-627.
58. Wu Wenbin, Yang Peng, Shibasaki R et al. Agent-based model for land use/cover change: A review. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2007, 27(4):573-578. (Chines Sourse)
59. Bousquet F, C Le Page. Multi-agent simulations and ecosystem management: A review. Ecological Modeling, 2004, 176: 313-332.
60. Xue Ling, Yang Kaizhong, Shen Tiyan. Agent-based modeling: the new advance in geocomputation. Advances in Earth Sciences, 2004, 19(2):305-311. (Chines Sourse)
61. Zhang Honghui, Zeng Yongnian, Jin Xiaobin et al. Urban land expansion model based on multi-agent system and application. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008, 63(8):869-881. (Chines Sourse)
62. Parker D C, Manson S M, Janssen M A et al. Multi-agent systems for the simulation of land-use and land-cover change: A review. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2003, 93: 314-337.
63. Grimm Vloker, Revilla Eloy, Berger Uta et al. Pattern-oriented modeling of agent-based complex systems: Lessons from ecology. Science, 2005, 310: 987-991.
64. Müller B, Birr-Pedersen K, Schou J S. Combined ecological and economic modelling in agricultural land use scenarios. Ecological Modelling, 2004, 174: 5-18.
65. Kotchen M J, Young O R. Meeting the challenges of the anthropocene: Towards a science of coupled human-biophysical systems. Global Environmental Change, 2007, 17: 149-151.
66. Lambin E F, Turner B L, Geist H G. The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Global Environmental Change, 2001, 11: 261-269.
67. Verburg P H, Chen Y, Veldkamp A. Spatial explorations of land use change and grain production in China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2000, 82: 333-354.
68. Wassenaar T, Gerber P, Verburg P H. Projecting land use changes in the Neotropics: The geography of pasture expansion into forest. Global Environmental Change, 2007, 17: 86-104.
69. Lambin E F, Geist H J, Lepers E. Dynamics of land-use and land-cover change in tropical regions. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2003, 28: 205-241.
70. Rounsevell M D A, Annetts J E, Audsley E et al. Modelling the spatial distribution of agricultural land use at the regional scale. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2003, 95: 465-479.
71. Wu W, Shibasaki R, Yang P et al. Global-scale modelling of future changes in sown areas of major crops. Ecological Modelling, 2007, 208: 378-390.
72. Van Tongeren F, Van Meijl H, Surry Y. Global models applied to agricultural and trade policies: A review and assessment. Agricultural Economics, 2001, 26: 149-172.
73. Overmars K P, Verburg P H. Multilevel modelling of land use from field to village level in the Philippines. Agricultural Systems, 2006, 89: 435-456.
74. De Koning G H J, Verburg P H, Veldkamp A et al. Multi-scale modelling of land use change dynamics in Ecuador. Agricultural Systems, 1999, 61: 77-93.
75. Verburg P H, Eickhout G, Van Meijl H. A multi-scale, multi-model approach for analyzing the future dynamics of European land use. The Annals of Regional Science, 2006.
76. Verburg P H, Vledkamp A. Projecting land use transitions at forest fringes in the Philippines at two spatial scales. Landscape Ecology, 2004, 19: 77-98.
77. Roetter R P, Hoanh C T, Laborte A G et al. Integration of systems network (SysNet) tools for regional land use scenario analysis in Asia. Environmental Modelling and Software, 2005, 20(3):291-307.
78. Castella J C, Boissau S, Trung T N et al. Agrarian transition and lowland-upland interactions in mountain areas in northern Vietnam: Application of a multi-agent simulation model. Agricultural Systems, 2005, 86(3):312-332.
79. Castella J C, Kam S P, Quang D D. Combining top-down and bottom-up modelling approaches of land use/cover change to support public policies: Application to sustainable management of natural resources in northern Vietnam. Land Use Policy, 2007, 24: 531-545.
80. Castella J C, Verburg P H. Combination of process-oriented and pattern-oriented models of land-use change in a mountain area of Vietnam. Ecological Modelling, 2007, 202: 410-420.
81. Overmars K P, de Groot W T, Huigen M G A. Comparing inductive and deductive modeling of land use decisions: Principles, a model and an illustration from the Philippines. Human Ecology, 2007, 35: 439-452.
82. Overmars K P, Verburg P H, Veldkamp A. Comparison of a deductive and an inductive approach to specify land suitability in a spatially explicit land use model. Land Use Policy, 2007, 24: 584-599.
83. Zhang Qiuju, Fu Bojie. Several problems of landscape patterns dynamics. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2003, 23(3):264-270. (Chines Sourse)
84. Wu Jianguo. Landscape Ecology: Pattern, Process, Scale and Hierarchy. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000. (Chines Sourse)
85. Rykiel Jr E J. Testing ecological models: The meaning of validation. Ecological Modelling, 1996, 90: 229-244.
86. Loehle C. A hypothesis testing framework for evaluating ecosystem model performance. Ecological Modelling, 1997, 97: 153-165.
87. Wada Y, Rajan K S, Shibaski R. Modelling the spatial distribution of shifting cultivation in Luangprabang, Lao PDR. Environmental and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2007, 34: 261-278.
88. Li A, Linderman M, Qi J et al. Exploring complexity in a human-environment system: An agent-based spatial model for multidisciplinary and multiscale integration. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2005, 95(1):54-79.
89. Cariboni J, Gatelli D, Liska R et al. The role of sensitivity analysis in ecological modeling. Ecological Modelling, 2007, 203: 167-182.
90. Snowling S D, Kramer J R. Evaluating modeling uncertainty for model selection. Ecological Modelling, 2001, 138: 17-30.
91. He C, Okada N, Zhang Q et al. Modelling dynamic urban expansion processes incorporating a potential model with cellular automata. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2008, 86: 79-91.
92. Lesschen J P, Verburg P H, Staal S J. Statistical methods for analyzing the spatial dimension of changes in land use and farming system. LUCC Report Series No. 7, 2005.
93. Hagen A E. Fuzzy set approach to assessing similarity of categorical maps. International Journal of Geographic Information Systems, 2003, 173: 235-249.
94. Pontius J R G, Huffaker D, Denman K. Useful techniques of validation for spatially explicit land-change models. Ecological Modelling, 2004, 179: 445-461.
95. Veldkamp A, Verburg P H, Kok K et al. The need for scale sensitive approaches in spatially explicit land use change modeling. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 2001, 6: 111-121. (Pubitemid 33642473)
96. Kok K, Farrow A, Veldkamp A et al. A method and application of multi-scale validation in spatial land use models. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2001, 85: 223-238.