Heterapoderopsis bicallosicollis (Coleoptera: Attelabidae): A potential biological control agent for triadica sebfera

Environmental Entomology

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 1135-1144

  Wang, Yi ^a,b   Ding, Jianqing ^a   Wheeler, Gregory S ^c   Purcell, Matfhew F ^d   Zhang, Guoan ^b  

^a Wuhan Institute of Botany Chinese Academy of Sciences   (China)

^b HUAZHONG AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c INVASIVE PLANT RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^d CSJRO Entomology   (Australia)

Author keywords

Biological weed control; China; Host specificity; Invasive plant; Leaf rolling weevil

Indexed keywords

BEETLE; BIOCONTROL AGENT; BIOLOGICAL CONTROL; HERBIVORE; HOST SPECIFICITY; INVASIVE SPECIES; OVIPOSITION; PHYSIOLOGY; WEED CONTROL;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CHINA; EGG LAYING; EUPHORBIA; FEMALE; FOOD PREFERENCE; GEOGRAPHY; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; LIFE CYCLE; PARASITOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; TEMPERATURE; WEEVIL;

ANIMALS; CHINA; EUPHORBIACEAE; FEMALE; FOOD PREFERENCES; GEOGRAPHY; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTIONS; LIFE CYCLE STAGES; OVIPOSITION; TEMPERATURE; WEEVILS;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

ATTELABIDAE; COLEOPTERA; EUPHORBIACEAE; PHYLLANTHUS URINARIA; SAPIUM; TRIADICA; TRIADICA SEBIFERA;

EID: 69849083512     PISSN: 0046225X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1603/022.038.0421     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Anonymous. 2007. China meteorological data sharing service system. (http:/ /www.cdc.cma.gov.cn/index.jsp-.
2. Briese, D. T. 2004. Weed biological control: applying science to solve seemingly intractable problems. Aust. J. Entomol. 43: 304-317.
3. Briese, D. T. 2005. Translating host-specificity test results into the real world: the need to armonize the yin and yang of current testing procedures. Biol. Control 35: 208-214.
4. Briese, D. T., and A. Walker. 2002. Anew perspective on the selection of test plants for evaluating the host-specificity of weed biological control agents: the case of Deuterocampta quadrijuga, a potential insect control agent of Heliotropium amplexicaule. Biol. Control 25: 273-287.
5. Briese, D. T., A. W. Sheppard, and J. M. Reifenberg. 1995. Open-field host-specificity testing for potential biological control agents of Onopordum thistles. Biol. Control 5: 158-166.
6. Briese, D. T., M. Zapater, A. Andorno, and C. Perez.Camargo. 2002. A two-phase open-field test to evaluate the host- specificity of candidate biological control agents for Heliotropiutn arnplexicassle. Biol. Control 25: 259-272.
7. Bruce, K. A., G. N. Cameron, P. A. Harcombe, and G. Jubi. nsky. 1997. Introduction, impact on native habitats, and management of a woody invader, the Chinese tallow tree, Sapiu;n sebiferu;n (L.) Roxb. Nat. Area. J. 17: 255-260.
8. Delfosse, E. 5. 2005. Risk and ethics in biological control. Biol. Control 353: 319-329.
9. Ding, J., R. Reardon, Y. Vu, IL Zheng, and W. Fu. 2006. Biological control of invasive plants through collaboration between China and the United States of America: a perspective. Biol. Invasions 8: 1439-1450.
10. Esser, H.-J. 1999. A partial revision of the Hippomaneae (Euphorbiaceae) in Malesia. Blumea 44: 149-215.
11. Goolsby, J. A., R. D. van Klinken, and V. A. Palmer. 2006. Maximising the contribution of native-range studies towards the identification and prioritisation of weed biocontrol agents. Aust. J. Entomol. 45: 276-286.
12. Hafliger, P., M. Schwarzlander, and B. Blossey. 2006. Impact of Arcltanara gerninipwscta (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on aboveground biomass production of Phraginites australis. Biol. Control 38: 413-421.
13. Iwata, K. 1935. On the habits of some Rhynchitinae, Attelabinae and Apoderinae in Japan (in Japanese). Kontyu 9: 261-278.
14. Jarosik, V., A. Honek, and A.F.G. Dixon. 2002. Developmental rate isomorphy in insects and mites. Am. Nat. 160: 497-510.
15. Jarosik, V., L. Kratochvil, A. Honek, and A.F.C. Dixon. 2004. A general rule for the dependence of developmental rate on temperature in ectothermic animals. Proc. R. Soc. B. 271: S219-S221.
16. Jubinsky, C., and L. C. Anderson. 1996. The invasive potential of Chinese tallow tree (Sapiurn sebiferum Roxb.) in the southeast. Castanea 61: 226-231.
17. Julien, M., and M. Griffiths. 1998. Biological control of weeds: a word catalogue of agents and their target weeds, 4th ed. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, United Kingdom.
18. Kluge, R. L. 2000. The future of biological control of weeds with insects: no more 'paranoia', no more 'honeymoon', pp. 459-467. In N. R. Spencer (ed), Proceedings of the X international symposium on biological control of weeds, 4-14 July 1999, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT.
19. Kobayashi, C., and M. Kato. 2004. To be suspended or to be cut off? Differences in the performance of two types of leaf-rolls constructed by the attelabid beetle Cycnotrachelus roelofsi. Popul. Ecol. 46: 193-202.
20. Legalov, A. A. 2001. Revision der holarktischen Auletini (Coleoptera, Attelabidae). Russ. Entomol. J. 10: 33-66.
21. Legalov, A. A. 2005. Trophic links of leaf-rolling weevils (Coleoptera, Rhynchitidae and Attelabidaes). Entomol. Rev. 85: 361-370.
22. Legalov, A. A. 2007. Leaf-rolling weevils (Coleoptera: Rhynchitidae, Attelabidae) of the world fauna. AgroSiberia, Novosibirsk, Russia.
23. Louda, S. M., D. Kendall,J. Connor, and D. Simberloff. 1997. Ecological effects of an insect introduced for the biological control of weeds. Science. 277: 1088-1090.
24. Louda, S. M., R. W. Pemberton, M. T. Johnson, and P. A. Follett. 2003. Nontarget effects-the Achilles' Heel of biological control? Retrospective analyses to reduce risk associated with biocontrol introductions. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 48: 365-396.
25. Ma, J., and Y. Cheng. 1997. Chinese plant flora. Science Press, Beijing, China.
26. MeClay, A. S., and J. K. Balciunas. 2005. The role of prerelease efficacy assessment in selecting classical biologi cal control agents for weeds-applying the Anna Karenina principle. Biol, Control 35: 197-207.
27. McFadyen, R. 1998. Biological control of weeds. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 43: 369-393.
28. Muller-Scharer, H., U. Schaffner, and T. Steinger. 2004. Evolution in invasive plants: implications for biological control. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 417-422.
29. Myers, R. 2005. Triadica sebifera. Fire effects information system. (http:/ /www.fs,fed.us/database/feis/).
30. [NOAA/NCDC] National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/National CliamaticDataCenter. 2004. Climatography of the United States No.20 1971-2000. (http:/ /www. ncdc,noaagov/oa/climate/noma1s/usnom-ials.html).
31. Pearson, D. E., and R. M. Callaway. 2003. Indirect effects of host-specific biological control agents. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 456-461.
32. Pearson, D. E., and R. M. Callaway. 2005. Indirect nontarget effects of host-specific biological control agents: implications for biological control. Biol. Control 35: 288-298.
33. Pemberton, R. W. 2000. Predictable risk to native plants in weed biocontrol. Oecologia (Berl.) 125: 489-494.
34. Renne, I. J., W. C. Barrow, L.A. Johnson Randall, and W. C. Bridges. 2002. Generalized avian dispersal syndrome contributes to Chinese tallow tree (Sapium sebiferum, Euphorbiaceae) invasiveness. Divers. Distrib. 8: 285-295.
35. Rogers, W. E., and E. Siemann. 2004. Invasive ecotypes tolerate herbivory more effectively than native ecotypes of the Chinese tallow Sapium sebiferum. J. AppI. Ecol. 41: 561-570.
36. Sheppard, A. W., R. D. van Klinken, and T. A. Heard. 2005. Scientific advances in the analysis of direct risks of weed biological control agents to nontarget plants. Biol. Control 35: 215-226.
37. Sheppard, A., M. Haines, and T. Thomann. 2006. Native- range research assists risk analysis for non-targets in weed biological control: the cautionary tale of the broom seed beetle. Aust. J. Entomol. 45: 292-297.
38. Siemann, E., and W. E. Rogers. 2003. Herbivory, disease, recruitment limitation and success of alien and native tree species. Ecology 84: 1489-1505.
39. Siemann, E., W. E. Rogers, and S. J. Dewalt. 2006. Rapid adaptation of insect herbivores to an invasive plant. Proc. R. Soc. B. 273: 2763-2769.
40. SPSS. 2002. SPSS 11.0 users guide. Lingnan University, Hong Kong, China.
41. Strong, D. R., and R. V. Pemberton. 2000. Ecology- biological control of invading species-risk and reform. Science 288: 1969-1970.
42. Trudgill, D. L., A. Honek, D. Li, and N.M.V. Straalen. 2005. Thermal time- concepts and utility. Ann. AppI. Biol. 146: 1-14.
43. [USDA/NRCS] US. Department of Agriculture/Natunil Resources Conservation Seedee. 2007. Plants profile: Triad ica sebifera (L.) small Chinese tallow tree. (http://plants. usda.gov/javaI nameSearch?keywordquery sapium + sebiferum&mode=sciname).
44. Wapshere, A. J. 1974. A strategy for evaluating the safety of organisms for biological weed control. Ann. AppI. Biol. 77:201-211.
45. Webster, C. L. 1994. Classification of the Euphorbiaceae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Card. 81: 3-32.
46. Zhang, K, and Y. Lin. 1994. Chinese tallow. China Forest Press, Beijing, China.
47. Zheng, H., Y. Wu,J. Ding, D. Binion, W. Fu, and R. Reardon. 2005. Invasive plants established in the United States that are found in Asia and their associated natural enemies. Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, Morgan- town, WV.