Mechanistic insights on the magnesium(II) ion-activated reduction of methyl benzoylformate with chelated NADH peptide β-lactam models

Journal of Organic Chemistry

Volumn 74, Issue 17, 2009, Pages 6691-6702

  Aizpurua, Jesus M ^a   Palomo, Claudio ^a   Fratila, Raluca M ^a   Ferrón, Pablo ^a   Benito, Ana ^a   Gómez Bengoa, Enrique ^a   Miranda, José I ^a   Santos, José I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINARY COMPLEXES; CHEMICAL EQUATIONS; ENANTIOSELECTIVE REDUCTION; METHYL BENZOYLFORMATE; NMR TECHNIQUES; PEPTIDE CHAIN; PEPTIDOMIMETICS; REACTION PATHWAYS; STRUCTURAL DIFFERENCES; TERNARY COMPLEX; TRANSITION STATE; TRIMETHYLSILYL;

ACETONITRILE; AMIDES; AMINES; DEUTERIUM; ENANTIOSELECTIVITY; MAGNESIUM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PEPTIDES;

CHELATION;

BETA LACTAM; MAGNESIUM ION; PHENYLGLYOXYLIC ACID; REDUCED NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE;

ARTICLE; ENANTIOSELECTIVITY; MOLECULAR MODEL; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; REACTION ANALYSIS; REDUCTION;

BETA-LACTAMS; CATIONS; CHELATING AGENTS; CHEMISTRY, ORGANIC; GLYOXYLATES; IONS; MAGNESIUM; MANDELIC ACIDS; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; NAD; NIACINAMIDE; PEPTIDES; STEREOISOMERISM;

EID: 69549086786     PISSN: 00223263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jo901236d     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. (a) Ohnishi, Y.; Numakunai, M.; Ohno, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1975, 3183-3184.
2. (b) Ohnishi, Y.; Kagami, M.; Ohno, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 4766-5476
3. Reviews on NADH models: (a) Burgess, V. A.; Davies, S. G.; Skerlj, R. T. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1991, 2, 299-328.
4. (b) Dupas, G.; Levacher, V.; Bourguignon, J.; Quéguiner, G. Heterocycles 1994, 39, 405-429.
5. (c) Wang, N. X.; Zhao, J. Synlett 2007, 2785-2791.
6. (a) Ohno, A.; Ikeguchi, M.; Kimura, T.; Oka, S. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1978, 328-329.
7. (b) De Kok, P. M.; Bastiaansen, L. A.; van Lier, P. M.; Vekemans, J. A.; Buck, H. M. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 1313-1320.
8. (a) Imanishi, T.; Hamano, Y.; Yoshikawa, H.; Iwata, C. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1988, 473-475.
9. (b) Obika, S.; Nishiyama, T.; Tatematsu, S.; Miyashita, K.; Imanishi, T. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 3073-3082.
10. (c) Li, J.; Liu, Y. C.; Deng, J. G. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1999, 10, 4343-4347.
11. (d) Li, J.; Liu, Y. C.; Deng, J. G.; Li, X. Z.; Cui, X.; Li, Z. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2000, 11, 2677-2682.
12. Ohno, A.; Kimura, T.; Yamamoto, H.; Kim, S. G.; Oka, S.; Ohnishi, Y. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1977, 50, 1535-1538.
13. For previous conformationally restricted NADH peptides, see: (a) Baba, N.; Oda, J.; Inouye, Y. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1980, 815-817.
14. (b) Seki, M.; Baba, N.; Oda, J.; Inouye, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 4613-4615.
15. (c) Seki, M.; Baba, N.; Oda, J.; Inouye, Y. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 1370-1373.
16. Saito, R.; Naruse, S.; Takano, K.; Fukuda, K.; Katoh, A.; Inouye, I. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 2067-2070.
17. Talma, A. J.; Jouin, P.; De Vries, J. G.; Trootswijk, C. B.; Werumeus Buning, G. H.; Waninge, J. K.; Visscher, J.; Kellogg, R. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 3981-3997.
18. (a) Kanomata, N.; Nakata, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 1207-1211.
19. (b) Kanomata, N.; Nakata, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 4563-4568.
20. (a) Eklund, H.; Branden, C. I. In Biological Macromolecules and Assemblies; Wiley: New York, 1985.
21. (b) Eklund, H.; Samama, J. P.; Jones, T. A. Biochemistry 1984, 33, 5982-5996.
22. According to the original Benner's model, this phenomenon would be caused by a "reverse anomeric effect" that is unlikely to occur in 1,4- dihydronicotinamides without N-glycosidic groups, see: (a) Nambiar, P. K.; Stauffer, D. M.; Kolodziej, P. A.; Benner, S. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 5886-5890.
23. (b) Wu, Y. D.; Houk, K. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 2353-2358.
24. (c) Almarsson, O.; Bruice, T. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 2125-2138.
25. (d) Luo, J.; Bruice, T. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 11952-11959.
26. Vasse, J. L.; Levacher, V.; Bourguignon, J.; Dupas, G. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2002, 13, 227-232.
27. 2+-mediated reduction of methyl benzoylformate with achiral dihydronicotinamide, see: (a) Toyooka, Y.; Matsuzawa, T.; Eguchi, T.; Kakinuma, K. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 6459-6474.
28. For theoretical studies on conformational features of NADH analogues, see: (b) Donkersloot, M. C. A.; Buck, H. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 6554-6558.
29. (c) Brewster, M. E.; Pop, E.; Huang, M.-J.; Bodor, N. Heterocycles 1994, 37, 1373-1415.
30. (d) Okamura, M.; Mikata, Y.; Yamazaki, N.; Tsutsumi, A.; Ohno, A. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1993, 66, 1197-1203.
31. (e) Obika, S.; Nishiyama, T.; Tatematsu, S.; Miyashita, K.; Imanishi, T. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 3073-3082.
32. (f) De Luca, G.; Marino, T.; Mineva, T.; Russo, N.; Toscano, M. J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM) 2000, 501-502, 215-220.
33. (g) Zhong, H.; Bowen, J. P. J. Mod. Graph. Model. 2005, 24, 1-9.
34. (a) Hughes, M.; Prince, R. H. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 1978, 40, 703-712.
35. (b) De Kok, P. M. T.; Donkersloot, M. C. A.; van Lier, P. M.; Meulendijks, G. H. W. M.; Bastiaansen, L. A. M.; van Hooff, H. J. G.; Kanters, J. A.; Buck, H. M. Tetrahedron 1986, 42, 941-959.
36. (c) Zehani, S.; Lin, J.; Gelbard, G. Tetrahedron 1989, 45, 733-740.
37. (d) Tamagaki, S.; Simojo, Y.; Mimura, T.; Tagaki, W. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1989, 62, 1593-1600.
38. (e) Wu, Y. D.; Houk, K. N. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 2043-2045.
39. (f) Bédat, J.; Plé, N.; Dupas, G.; Bourguignon, J.; Quéguiner, G. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1995, 6, 923-932.
40. (g) Leroy, C.; Levacher, V.; Dupas, G.; Quéguiner, G.; Bourguignon, J. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1997, 8, 3309-3318.
41. (h) Vitry, C.; Bédat, J.; Prigent, Y.; Levacher, V.; Dupas, G.; Salliot, I.; Quéguiner, G.; Bourguignon, J. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 9101-9108.
42. (a) Fukuzumi, S.; Nishizawa, N.; Tanaka, T. Chem. Lett. 1983, 1755-1758.
43. (b) Ohno, A.; Yamamoto, H.; Oka, S. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1981, 3489-3491.
44. (a) Freidinger, R. M.; Veber, D. F.; Perlow, D. S.; Brookas, J. R.; Saperstein, R. Science 1980, 210, 656-658.
45. (b) Freidinger, R. M. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 5553-5566.
46. For extendedNADHpeptide models, see: (a) Endo, T.; Hayashi, Y.; Okawara, M. Chem. Lett. 1977, 391-394.
47. (b) Endo, T.; Kawasaki, H.; Okawara, M. Tetrahedron. Lett. 1979, 23-26.
48. (c) Saito, R.; Naruse, S.; Takano, K.; Fukuda, K.; Katoh, A.; Inouye, I. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 2067-2070. stationary phase.
49. (a) Palomo, C.; Aizpurua, J. M.; Benito, A.; Miranda, J. I.; Fratila, R. M.; Matute, C.; Domercq, M.; Gago, F.; Martín-Santamaria, S.; Linden, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 16243-16260.
50. (b) Palomo, C.; Aizpurua, J. M.; Balentova, E.; Jimenez, A.; Oyarbide, J.; Fratila, R. M.; Miranda, J. I. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 101-104.
51. (a) Palomo, C.; Aizpurua, J. M.; Legido, M.; Galarza, R.; Deya, P. M.; Dunogues, J.; Picard, J. P.; Ricci, A.; Seconi, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 1239-1241.
52. (b) Palomo, C.; Aizpurua, J. M.; Legido, M.; Mielgo, A.; Galarza, R. Chem. Eur. J. 1997, 3, 1432-1441.
53. (c) Palomo, C.; Aizpurua, J. M.; Ganboa, I.; Benito, A.; Cuerdo, L.; Fratila, R. M.; Jimenez, A.; Loinaz, I.; Miranda, J. I.; Pytlewska, K. R.; Micle, A.; Linden, A. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 4443-4446.
54. In the case of α-(2-methylnaphthyl)-β-lactams 6d and 6f a partial hydrogenation of the naphthalene moiety was observed and the corresponding 5,6,7,8-tetrahydronaphthyl derivatives were obtained.
55. (a) Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785-789.
56. (b) Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648-5652.
57. (c) Kohn, W.; Becke, A. D.; Parr, R. G. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 12974-12980.
58. Frisch, M. J.; et al. Gaussian 03, Revision D.03; Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford, CT, 2004.
59. Gonzalez, C.; Schlegel, H. B. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 5523-5527.
60. (a) Cancés, E.; Mennucci, B.; Tomasi, J. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107, 3032-3047.
61. (b) Cossi, M.; Barone, V.; Mennuci, B.; Tomasi J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1998, 286, 253-260.
62. (c) Tomasi, J.; Mennucci, B.; Cancés, E. J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM) 1999, 464, 211-226.
63. (a) Kluge, S.; Weston, J. Biochemistry 2005, 44, 4877-4885.
64. - counterions, see: Cha, J. N.; Cheong, B. S.; Cho, H. G. J. Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, 1789-1796.
65. Zhu, X. Q.; Li, H. R.; Li, Q.; Ai, T.; Lu, J. Y.; Yang, Y.; Cheng, J. P. Chem. Eur. J. 2003, 9, 871-880.
66. Simon, L.; Goodman, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 8741-8747.
67. To facilitate comparison, we assigned the notation nnA to all the ternary complexes and transition states resulting from the replacement of the β-lactam 11 by the open NADH model 11A.
68. Hoshide, F.; Baba, N.; Oda, J.; Inouye, Y. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1983, 47, 2141-2143.
69. Palomo, C.; Aizpurua, J. M.; Benito, A.; Cuerdo, L.; Fratila, R. M.; Miranda, J. I.; Linden, A. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 6368-6373.
70. For similar observations on other NADH models, see: Marchelli, R.; Dradi, E.; Dossena, A.; Casnati, G. Tetrahedron 1982, 38, 2061-2067.