Effect of lot size reduction and continuous improvement on work in process and utilization: Study using a combined system dynamics and factory physics approach;Efeito da redução do tamanho de lote e de programas de melhoria contínua no estoque em processo (WIP) e na Utilização: Estudo utilizando uma abordagem híbrida system dynamics - factory physics

Producao

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 214-229

  Godinho Filho, Moacir ^a   Uzsoy, Reha ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO CARLOS   (Brazil)

^b North Carolina State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Continuous Improvement; Factory physics; Lot Size; System dynamics; Utilization; Work in process

Indexed keywords

EID: 69449097737     PISSN: 01036513     EISSN: 19805411     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0103-65132009000100014     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Adams, M., et al. Simulation As A Tool For Continuous Process Improvement. Winter Simulation Conference, 1999.
2. Attadia, L. C.; Martins, R. A. Medição de desempenho como base para evolução da melhoria contínua. Produção, v. 13, n. 2, p. 33-41, 2003.
3. Baines, T. S.; D. K. Harrison. An Opportunity For System Dynamics In Manufacturing System Modeling. Production Planning and Control, v. 10, n. 6, p. 542-552, 1999.
4. Berger, A. Continuous Improvement And Kaizen: Standartization And Organizational Designs. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, v. 8, n. 2, p. 110-117, 1997.
5. Bessant, J.; D. Francis. Developing Strategic Continuous Improvement Capability. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 19, n. 11, p. 1106-1119, 1999.
6. Bhuiyan, N.; A. Baghel. An Overview Of Continuous Improvement: From The Past To The Present. Management Decision, v. 43, n. 5, p. 761-771, 2005.
7. Caffyn, S. Development Of A Continuous Improvement Self-Assessment Tool. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 19, n. 11, p. 1138-1153, 1999.
8. Forrester, J. W. Industrial Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1962.
9. Hopp, W.; M. L. Spearman. Factory Physics. Boston: Irwin, 2001.
10. Imai, M. Kaizen - The Key To Japan's Competitive Success. Nova York: Random House, 1986.
11. Jha, S. et al. The Dynamics Of Continuous Improvement: Aligning Organizational Attributes And Activities For Quality And Productivity. International Journal of Quality Science, v. 19, n. 10, p. 1010-1033, 1996.
12. Karmarkar, U. S. et al. Lot Sizing and Lead Time Performance in a Manufacturing Cell. Interfaces, v. 15, n. 2, p. 1-9, 1985b.
13. Kerrin, M. Continuous Improvement Capability: Assessment Within One Case Study Organisation. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 19, n. 11, p. 1154-1167, 1999.
14. Lasdon, L. S. Optimization theory for Large Systems. Nova York: Macmillan, 1970.
15. Leede, J.; Looise J. K. Continuous Improvement And The Mini-Company Concept. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 19, n. 11, p. 1188-1202, 1999.
16. Liker, J. The Toyota Way: 14 Management Principles from the World's Greatest Manufacturer. Nova York: McGraw-Hill, 2004.
17. Lin, C. et al. Generic Methodology That Aids The Application Of System Dynamics To Manufacturing System Modeling. IEE Conference Publication, v. 457, p. 344-349, 1998.
18. Mapes, J. et al. Process Variability And Its Effects On Plant Performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 20, n. 7, p. 792-808, 2000.
19. Mesquita, M.; Alliprandini, D. H. Competências essenciais para melhoria contínua da produção: estudo de caso em empresas da indústria de autopeças. Gestão & Produção, v.10, n.1, p. 17-33, 2003.
20. Pande, P. et al. The Six Sigma Way: How GE, Motorola and Other Top Companies are Honing Their Performance. Nova York: McGraw-Hill, 2000.
21. Pentillä, M. J. Reducing variability in a semiconductor manufacturing environment. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. Boston, Massachusetts Institute of Tehcnology. Master: 75, 2005.
22. Savolainen, T. I. Cycles of continuous improvement: Realizing competitive advantages through quality. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 19, n. 11, p. 1203-1222, 1999.
23. Schoemig, A. K. The Corrupting Influence of Variability in Semiconductor Manufacturing. Winter Simulation Conference, 1999.
24. Shingo, S. A Revolution in Manufacturing: The SMED System. Cambridge: Productivity Press, 1986.
25. Spearman, M. L.; Hopp, W. J. Teaching operations management from a science of manufacturing. Production and Operations Management, v. 7, n. 2, p. 132-145, 1998.
26. Standridge, C. R. How factory physics helps simulation. Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation Conference, 2004.
27. Sterman, J. D. Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Nova York: McGraw-Hill, 2000.
28. Suri, R. Quick Response Manufacturing: A Companywide Approach to Reducing Lead Times. Portland: Productivity Press, 1998.
29. Tesfamariam, D.; Lindberg, B. Aggregate analysis of manufacturing systems using system dynamics and ANP. Computers & Industrial Engineering, v. 19, p. 98-117, 2005.
30. Treville, S. D. et al. From supply chain to demand chain: the role of lead time reduction in improving demand chain performance. Journal of Operations Management, v. 21, p. 613-627, 2004.
31. Vaughan, T. S. Lot Size Effects On Process Lead Time, Lead Time Demand, And Safety Stock. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 100, p. 1-9, 2006.
32. Womack, J. P. et al. The machine that changed the world. Nova York: Harper Perennial, 2000.