Finite element study of scaffold architecture design and culture conditions for tissue engineering

Biomaterials

Volumn 30, Issue 30, 2009, Pages 6142-6149

  Olivares, Andy L ^a,b   Marsal, Èlia ^b   Planell, Josep A ^a,b   Lacroix, Damien ^a  

^a INSTITUTE FOR BIOENGINEERING OF CATALONIA IBEC   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Computational fluid dynamics; Finite element; Rapid prototyping; Scaffold; Tissue engineering

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURE DESIGNS; AXIAL STRAIN; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELLULAR LEVELS; COMPRESSIVE STRAIN; COMPUTATIONAL APPROACH; CULTURE CONDITIONS; DIFFERENTIATION PROCESS; FINITE ELEMENT; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FINITE-ELEMENT STUDY; FLUID FLOW; FLUID SHEAR STRESS; HEXAGONAL STRUCTURES; INITIAL CONDITIONS; ITS ARCHITECTURE; MACROSCOPIC SCALE; MECHANICAL LOADS; MECHANICAL STIMULUS; MECHANICAL SUPPORT; MECHANO-REGULATION; MICROSCOPIC LEVELS; PORE DISTRIBUTION; PORE MORPHOLOGY; SCAFFOLD STRUCTURES; TISSUE ENGINEERING SCAFFOLD; TISSUE REGENERATION;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; CELL CULTURE; CELL MEMBRANES; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; CONCURRENT ENGINEERING; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FLOW OF FLUIDS; FLUID DYNAMICS; FLUIDS; JOB ANALYSIS; RAPID PROTOTYPING; SHEAR STRAIN; SHEAR STRESS; STRENGTH OF MATERIALS; THERMOELECTRICITY; TISSUE; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

SCAFFOLDS;

TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

ARTICLE; BIOREACTOR; CELL CULTURE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FLUID FLOW; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MECHANICAL STIMULATION; MECHANICAL STRESS; MICROSCOPY; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHEAR STRESS; TISSUE CULTURE; TISSUE DIFFERENTIATION; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE REGENERATION; TISSUE TRANSPLANTATION;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BIOREACTORS; BONE AND BONES; CARTILAGE; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; POROSITY; PRESSURE; SOFTWARE; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

EID: 69249229501     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.07.041     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Martin I., Wendt D., and Heberer M. The role of bioreactors in tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol 22 (2004) 80-86
2. Sandino C., Planell J.A., and Lacroix D. A finite element study of mechanical stimuli in scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Biomech 41 (2008) 1005-1014
3. Cartmell S.H., Porter B.D., Garcia A.J., and Guldberg R.E. Effects of medium perfusion rate on cell-seeded three-dimensional bone constructs in vitro. Tissue Eng 9 6 (2003) 1197-1203
4. Chua C.K., Leong K.F., Cheah C.M., and Chua S.W. Development of a tissue engineering scaffold structure library for rapid prototyping. Part 1: investigation and classification. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 21 (2003) 291-301
5. Hutmacher D.W., Sittinger M., and Risbud M.V. Scaffold-based tissue engineering: rationale for computer-aided design and solid free-form fabrication systems. Trends Biotechnol 22 7 (2004) 354-362
6. Hollister S.J., Maddox R.D., and Taboas J.M. Optimal design and fabrication of scaffolds to mimic tissue properties and satisfy biological constraints. Biomaterials 23 (2002) 4095-4103
7. Boschetti F., Raimondi M.T., Migliavacca F., and Dubini G. Prediction of the micro-fluid dynamic environment imposed to three-dimensional engineered cell systems in bioreactors. J Biomech 39 (2006) 418-425
8. Adachi T., Osako Y., Tanaka M., Hojo M., and Hollister S.J. Framework for optimal design of porous scaffold microstructure by computational simulation of bone regeneration. Biomaterials 27 (2006) 3964-3972
9. Meyer U., Buchter A., Nazer N., and Wiesmann H.P. Design and performance of a bioreactor system for mechanically promoted three dimensional tissue engineering. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44 (2006) 134-140
10. Hollister S.J. Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering. Nat Mater 4 (2005) 518-524
11. Porter B., Zauel R., Stockman H., Guldberg R., and Fyhrie D. 3-D computational modeling of media flow of media flow through scaffolds in a perfusion bioreactor. J Biomech 38 (2005) 543-549
12. Hutmacher D.W. Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials 21 (2000) 2529-2543
13. Reich K.M., and Frangos J.A. Effect of flow on prostaglandin E2 and inositol triphosphate levels in osteoblasts. Am J Physiol 261 (1991) 428-432
14. Cowin S.C. Mechanosensation and fluid transport in living bone. J Musculoskel Neuron Interact 2 3 (2002) 256-260
15. Reich K.M., Gay C.V., and Frangos J.A. Fluid shear stress as a mediator of osteoblast cyclic adenosine monophosphate production. J Cell Physiol 143 (1990) 100-104
16. Klein-Nulend J., Van der Plas A., Semeins C.M., Ajubi N.E., Frangos J.A., Nijweide P.J., et al. Sensitivity of osteocytes to biomechanical stress in vitro. FASEB J 9 (1995) 441-445
17. Prendergast P.J., Huiskes R., and Soballe K. Biophysical stimuli on cells during tissue differentiation at implant interfaces. J Biomech 30 (1997) 539-548
18. Lacroix D., and Prendergast P.J. A mechano-regulation model for tissue differentiation during fracture healing: analysis of gap size and loading. J Biomech 35 9 (2002) 1163-1171
19. Byrne D.P., Lacroix D., Planell J.A., Kelly D.J., and Prendergast P.J. Simulation of tissue differentiation in a scaffold as a function of porosity, Young's modulus and dissolution rate: application of mechanobiological models in tissue engineering. Biomaterials 28 (2007) 5544-5554
20. Chua C.K., Leong K.F., Cheah C.M., and Chua S.W. Development of a tissue engineering scaffold structure library for rapid prototyping. Part 2: parametric library and assembly program. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 21 (2003) 302-312
21. Gabbrielli R., Turner I.G., and Bowen C.R. Development of modelling methods for materials to be used as bone substitutes. Key Eng Mater 361-363 II (2008) 901-906
22. Melchels F.P.W., Feijen J., and Grijpma D.W. A poly(d,l-lactide) resin for the preparation of tissue engineering scaffolds by stereolithography. Biomaterials 30 (2009) 3801-3809
23. Wendt D., Marsano A., Jakob M., Heberer M., and Martin I. Oscillating perfusion of cell suspensions through three-dimensional scaffolds enhances cell seeding efficiency and uniformity. Biotechnol Bioeng 84 2 (2003) 205-214
24. Yang S., Leong K.F., and Chua Ch.K. The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part 1. Traditional factors. Tissue Eng 7 6 (2001) 679-689
25. Bacabac R.G., Smit T.H., Cowin S.C., Van Loon J.J.W.A., Nieuwstadt F.T.M., Heethaar R., et al. Dynamic shear stress in parallel-plate flow chambers. J Biomech 38 (2005) 159-167
26. Wang S., and Tarbell J.M. Effect of fluid flow on smooth muscle cells in a 3-dimensional collagen gel model. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 20 10 (2000) 2220-2225
27. Geris L., Andreykiv A., Van Oosterwyck H., Vander Sloten J., van Keulen F., Duyck J., et al. Numerical simulation of tissue differentiation around loaded titanium implants in a bone chamber. J Biomech 37 (2004) 763-769
28. Claes L.E., and Heigele C.A. Magnitudes of local stress and strain along bony surfaces predict the curse and type of fracture healing. J Biomech 32 (1999) 255-266
29. Carter D.R., Blenman P.R., and Beaupre G.S. Correlations between mechanical stress history and tissue differentiation in initial fracture healing. J Orthop Res 6 (1988) 736-748