The role of localization in the operation of the mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint

Cell Cycle

Volumn 8, Issue 16, 2009, Pages 2650-2660

  Lohel, Maiko ^a,b   Ibrahim, Bashar ^b   Diekmann, Stephan ^c   Dittrich, Peter ^a  

^a FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

^b GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

^c FRITZ LIPMANN INSTITUTE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Computational systems biology; Mitosis; Signaling networks; Spatial simulation; Spindle assembly checkpoint

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN MAD2;

ARTICLE; BINDING KINETICS; BINDING SITE; CATALYST; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MICROTUBULE ASSEMBLY; MITOSIS; MITOSIS SPINDLE; MITOTIC SPINDLE ASSEMBLY CHECKPOINT; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; REGULATORY MECHANISM;

EID: 69249216632     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.8.16.9383     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Musacchio A, Salmon ED. The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007; 8:379-93.
2. Cimini D, Degrassi F. Aneuploidy: a matter of bad connections. Trends Cell Biol 2005; 15:442-51.
3. Kops GJPL, Weaver BAA, Cleveland DW. On the road to cancer: aneuploidy and the mitotic checkpoint. Nat Rev Cancer 2005; 5:773-85.
4. Cheeseman IM, Desai A. Molecular architecture of the kinetochore- microtubule interface. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2008; 9:33-46.
5. Westermann S, Drubin DG, Barnes G. Structures and functions of yeast kinetochore complexes. Ann Rev Biochem 2007; 76:563-91.
6. Maiato H, DeLuca J, Salmon ED, Earnshaw WC. The dynamic kinetochore-microtubule interface. J Cell Sci 2004; 117:5461-77.
7. Shah JV, Cleveland DW. Waiting for anaphase: Mad2 and the spindle assembly checkpoint. Cell 2000; 103:997-1000.
8. De Antoni A, Pearson CG, Cimini D, Canman JC, Sala V, Nezi L, et al. The Mad1/ Mad2 complex as a template for Mad2 activation in the spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr Biol 2005; 15:214-25.
9. Yu H. Regulation of APC-Cdc20 by the spindle checkpoint. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2002; 14:706-14.
10. Doncic A, Ben-Jacob E, Barkai N. Evaluating putative mechanisms of the mitotic spindle checkpoint. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:6332-7.
11. Sear RP, Howard M. Modeling dual pathways for the metazoan spindle assembly checkpoint. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103:16758-63.
12. Ibrahim B, Diekmann S, Schmitt E, Dittrich P. Mad2 binding is not sufficient for complete Cdc20 sequestering in mitotic transition control (an in silico study). Biophys Chem 2008; 134:93-100.
13. Ibrahim B, Diekmann S, Schmitt E, Dittrich P. In-silico modeling of the mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint. PLoS ONE 2008; 3:1555.
14. Ibrahim B, Schmitt E, Dittrich P, Diekmann S. In silico study of kinetochore control, amplification and inhibition effects in MCC assembly. Biosystems 2009; 95:35-50.
15. Simonetta M, Manzoni R, Mosca R, Mapelli M, Massimiliano L, Vink M, et al. The influence of catalysis on mad2 activation dynamics. PLoS Biology 2009; 7:1000010.
16. Mistry HB, MacCallum DE, Jackson RC, Chaplain MAJ, Davidson FA. Modeling the temporal evolution of the spindle assembly checkpoint and role of aurora b kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2008; 105:20215-20.
17. Luo X, Tang Z, Xia G, Wassermann K, Matsumoto T, Rizo J, et al. The Mad2 spindle checkpoint protein has two distinct natively folded states. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2004; 11:338-45.
18. Schreiber G. Kinetic studies of protein-protein interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002; 12:41-7.
19. Schlosshauer M, Baker D. Realistic protein-protein association rates from a simple diffusional model neglecting long-range interactions, free energy barriers and landscape ruggedness. Protein Sci 2004; 13:1660-9.
20. Berg OG, von Hippel PH. Diffusion-controlled macromolecular interactions. Annu Rev Biophys Bio 1985; 14:131-58.
21. Glaser R. Biophysics. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer 2001.
22. O'Connel CB, Khodjakov A. Cooperative mechanisms of mitotic spindle formation. J Cell Sci 2007; 120:1717-22.
23. Wollman R, Cytrynbaum EN, Jones JT, Meyer T, Scholey JM, Mogilner A. Efficient chromosome capture requires a bias in the 'search-and-capture' process during mitoticspindle assembly. Curr Biol 2005; 15:828-32.
24. Kulukian A, Han JS, Cleveland DW. Unattached kinetochores catalyze production of an anaphase inhibitor that requires a Mad2 template to prime Cdc20 for BubR1 binding. Dev Cell 2009; 16:105-17.
25. Malureanu LA, Jeganathan KB, Hamada M, Wasilewski L, Davenport J, van Deursen JM. BubR1 N terminus acts as a soluble inhibitor of cyclin B degradation by APC/C (Cdc20) in interphase. Dev Cell 2009; 16:118-131