HAAD: A quick algorithm for accurate prediction of hydrogen atoms in protein structures

PLoS ONE

Volumn 4, Issue 8, 2009, Pages

  Li, Yunqi ^a   Roy, Ambrish ^a   Zhang, Yang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYDROGEN; PROTEIN;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HYBRIDIZATION; HYDROGEN ATOM ADDITION; HYDROGEN BOND; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; NEUTRON DIFFRACTION; PREDICTION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; X RAY DIFFRACTION; CHEMISTRY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION;

ALGORITHMS; HYDROGEN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; X-RAY DIFFRACTION;

EID: 69249137563     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006701     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Rose GD, Fleming PJ, Banavar JR, Maritan A (2006) A backbone-based theory of protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 16623-16633.
2. Baud F, Pebay-Peyroula E, Cohen-Addad C, Odani S, Lehmann MS (1993) Crystal structure of hydrophobic protein from soybean; a member of a new cysteine-rich family. J Mol Biol 231: 877-887.
3. Dill KA, Bromberg S, Yue K, Fiebig KM, Yee DP, et al. (1995) Principles of protein folding-a perspective from simple exact models. Protein Sci 4: 561-602.
4. Shakhnovich SaEI (2008) Understanding ensemble protein folding at atomic detail. J Phys: Condens Matter 20: 283101.
5. Jones S, Thornton JM (1996) Principles of protein-protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93: 13-20.
6. Wang W, Donini O, Reyes CM, Kollman PA (2001) Biomolecular simulations: recent developments in force fields, simulations of enzyme catalysis, protein-ligand, protein-protein, and protein-nucleic acid noncovalent interactions. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 30: 211-243.
7. Klebe G (2006) Virtual ligand screening: strategies, perspectives and limitations. Drug Discov Today 11: 580-594.
8. Anderson AC (2003) The process of structure-based drug design. Chem Biol 10: 787-797.
9. Zhang Y (2009) Protein structure prediction: When is it useful? Corr Opin Struct Biol: doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2009.1002.1005.
10. Cohen M, Reichmann D, Neuvirth H, Schreiber G (2008) Similar chemistry, but different bond preferences in inter versus intra-protein interactions. Proteins 72: 741-753.
11. Gochin M, Roder H (1995) Protein structure refinement based on paramagnetic NMR shifts: applications to wild-type and mutant forms of cytochrome c. Protein Sci 4: 296-305.
12. Kimura SR, Tebben AJ, Langley DR (2008) Expanding GPCR homology model binding sites via a balloon potential: A molecular dynamics refinement approach. Proteins 71: 1919-1929.
13. Engler N, Ostermann A, Niimura N, Parak FG (2003) Hydrogen atoms in proteins: positions and dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 10243-10248.
14. Chen J, Brooks CL 3rd (2007) Can molecular dynamics simulations provide high-resolution refinement of protein structure? Proteins 67: 922-930.
15. McDonald IK, Thornton JM (1994) Satisfying hydrogen bonding potential in proteins. J Mol Biol 238: 777-793.
16. Canutescu AA, Shelenkov AA, Dunbrack RL, Jr (2003) A graph-theory algorithm for rapid protein side-chain prediction. Protein Sci 12: 2001-2014.
17. Sali A, Blundell TL (1993) Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol 234: 779-815.
18. Forrest LR, Honig B (2005) An assessment of the accuracy of methods for predicting hydrogen positions in protein structures. Proteins 61: 296-309.
19. Word JM, Lovell SC, Richardson JS, Richardson DC (1999) Asparagine and glutamine: using hydrogen atom contacts in the choice of side-chain amide orientation. J Mol Biol 285: 1735-1747.
20. Brooks BR, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson BD, States DJ, Swaminathan S, et al. (1983) CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. Journal of Computational Chemistry 4: 187-217.
21. Brunger AT, Karplus M (1988) Polar hydrogen positions in proteins: empirical energy placement and neutron diffraction comparison. Proteins 4: 148-156.
22. Brunger AT, Adams PD, Clore GM, DeLano WL, Gros P, et al. (1998) Crystallography & NMR system: A new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 54: 905-921.
23. Lindahl E, Hess B, Spoel Dvd (2001) GROMACS 3.0: a package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis. J Mol Model 7: 306-317.
24. Vriend G (1990) WHAT IF: a molecular modeling and drug design program. J Mol Graph 8: 52-56-29.
25. Li YQ, Zhang Y (2009) REMO: A new protocol to refine full atomic protein models from C-alpha traces by optimizing hydrogen-bonding networks. Proteins: doi:10.1002/prot.22380.
26. Verma A, Wenzel W (2007) Protein structure prediction by all-atom free-energy refinement. BMC Struct Biol 7: 12.
27. Pauling L (1931) the nature of the chemical bond. Application of results obtained from the quantum mechanics and from a theory of paramagnetic susceptibility to the structure of molecules. J Am Chem Soc 53: 1367-1400.
28. MacKerell AD, Bashford D, Bellott M, Dunbrack RL, Evanseck JD, et al. (1998) All-Atom Empirical Potential for Molecular Modeling and Dynamics Studies of Proteins. J Phys Chem B 102: 3586-3616.
29. Bickelhaupt FM, Baerends EJ (2003) The case for steric repulsion causing the staggered conformation of ethane. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 42: 4183-4188; discussion 4188-4194.
30. Pophristic V, Goodman L (2001) Hyperconjugation not steric repulsion leads to the staggered structure of ethane. Nature 411: 565-568.
31. Kossiakoff AA (1982) Protein dynamics investigated by the neutron diffraction-hydrogen exchange technique. Nature 296: 713-721.
32. Herrmann T, Guntert P, Wuthrich K (2002) Protein NMR structure determination with automated NOE assignment using the new software CANDID and the torsion angle dynamics algorithm DYANA. J Mol Biol 319: 209-227.
33. Ulrich EL, Akutsu H, Doreleijers JF, Harano Y, Ioannidis YE, et al. (2008) BioMagResBank. Nucleic Acids Res 36: D402-408.
34. Nilges M (1997) Ambiguous distance data in the calculation of NMR structures. Fold Des 2: S53-57.
35. Kabsch W (1978) A discussion of the solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vecotrs. Acta Cryst A 34: 827-828.
36. Read RJ, Chavali G (2007) Assessment of CASP7 predictions in the high accuracy template-based modeling category. Proteins 69: 27-37.
37. Li Y, Lee J, Lal J, An L, Huang Q (2008) Effects of pH on the Interactions and Conformation of Bovine Serum Albumin: Comparison between Chemical Force Microscopy and Small-Angle Neutron Scattering. J Phys Chem B 112: 3797-3806.
38. Kossiakoff AA (1983) Neutron protein crystallography: advances in methods and applications. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng 12: 159-182.
39. Seeliger D, de Groot BL (2007) Atomic contacts in protein structures. A detailed analysis of atomic radii, packing, and overlaps. Proteins 68: 595-601.
40. Rowland RS, Taylor R (1996) Intermolecular Nonbonded Contact Distances in Organic Crystal Structures: Comparison with Distances Expected from van der Waals Radii. J Phys Chem 100: 7384-7391.