Ambiguous distance data in the calculation of NMR structures

Folding and Design

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 1997, Pages

  Nilges, Michael ^a  

^a EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; REVIEW;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION;

EID: 0030635055     PISSN: 13590278     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1359-0278(97)00064-3     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Brünger, A.T. & Nilges, M. (1993). Computational challenges for macromolecular structure determination by X-ray crystallography and solution NMR spectroscopy. Quart. Rev. Biophys. 26, 49-125.
2. Kuntz, I.D., Thomason, J.F., & Oshiro, C.M. (1989). Distance geometry. Methods. Enzymol. 177, 159-204.
3. Havel, T.F. (1991). An evaluation of computational strategies for use in the determination of protein-structure from distance constraints obtained by nuclear magnetic resonance. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 56, 43-78.
4. Braun, W. (1987). Distance geometry and related methods for protein structure determination from NMR data. Quart. Rev. Biophys. 19, 115-157.
5. Güntert, P. & Wüthrich, K. (1991). Improved efficiency of protein structure calculations from NMR data using the program DIANA with redundant dihedral angle constraints. J. Biomol. NMR 1, 447-456.
6. Levitt, M. (1983). Protein folding by restrained energy minimization and molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Biol. 170, 723-764.
7. Kaptein, R., Zuiderweg, E. R.P., Scheek, R.M., Boelens, R. & Van Gunsteren, W.A. (1985). A protein structure from nuclear magnetic resonance data. Lac repressor headpiece. J. Mol. Biol. 182, 179-182.
8. 1H-nuclear magnetic resonance and restrained molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Biol. 186, 435-455.
9. Brünger, A.T., Clore, G.M., Gronenborn, A.M. & Karplus, M. (1986). Three-dimensional structure of proteins determined by molecular dynamics with interproton distance restraints: application to crambin. Proc. Natl Acad Sci. USA 83, 3801-3805.
10. Nilges, M., Clore, G.M. & Gronenborn, A.M. (1988). Determination of three-dimensional structures of proteins by hybrid distance geometry-dynamical simulated annealing calculations. FEBS Lett. 229, 317-324.
11. Nilges, M., Gronenborn, A.M., Brünger, A.T. & Clore, G.M. (1988). Determination of three-dimensional structures of proteins by simulated annealing with interproton distance restraints: application to crambin, potato carboxypeptidase inhibitor and barley serine proteinase inhibitor 2. Protein Eng. 2, 27-38.
12. Nilges, M., Clore, G.M. & Gronenborn, A.M. (1988). Determination of three-dimensional structures of proteins from interproton distance data by dynamical simulated annealing from a random array of atoms: avoiding problems associated with folding. FEBS Lett. 239, 129-136.
13. Nilges, M., Kuszewski, J. & Brünger, A.T. (1991). Sampling properties of simulated annealing and distance geometry. In Computational Aspects of the Study of Biological Macromolecules by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, vol. 225 of NATO ASI Series. (Hoch, J.C., Poulsen, F.M., & Redfield, C., eds), pp. 451-455, Plenum, New York.
14. Brünger, A.T. (1992). X-PLOR. A System for X-ray Crystallography and NMR. Yale University Press, New Haven.
15. Herzyk, P. & Hubbard, R.E. (1993). A reduced representation of proteins for use in restraint satisfaction calculations. Proteins 17, 310-324.
16. Hoch, J.C. & Stern, A.S. (1992). A method for determining overall protein fold from NMR distance restraints. J. Biomol. NMR 2, 535-543.
17. 1H NMR. Proteins 17, 297-309.
18. Nilges, M. (1995). Calculation of protein structures with ambiguous distance restraints. Automated assignment of ambiguous NOE cross-peaks and disulphide connectivities. J. Mol. Biol. 245, 645-660.
19. Van Schaik, R.C., Berendsen, H.J., Torda, A.E. & Van Gunsteren, W.F. (1993). A structure refinement method based on molecular dynamics in four spatial dimensions. J. Mol. Biol. 234, 751-762.
20. Nakai, T., Kidera, A. & Nakamura, H. (1993). Intrinsic nature of the three-dimensional structure of proteins as determined by distance geometry with good sampling properties. J. Biomol. NMR 3, 19-40.
21. Rice, L.M. & Brünger, A.T. (1994). Torsion angle dynamics: reduced variable conformational sampling enhances crystallographic structure refinement. Proteins 19, 277-290.
22. Stein, E.G., Rice, L.M. & Brünger, A.T. (1997). Torsion angle molecular dynamics as a new efficient tool for NMR structure calculation. J. Magn. Reson. 124, 154-164.
23. Mumenthaler, C. & Braun, W. (1996). Automated assignment of simulated and experimental NOESY spectra of proteins by feedback filtering and self-correcting distance geometry. J. Mol. Biol. 254, 465-480.
24. Güntert, P., Berndt, K.D. & Wüthrich, K. (1993). The program ASNO for computer-supported collection of NOE upper distance constraints as input for protein structure determination. J. Biomol. NMR 3, 601-606.
25. Meadows, R.P., Olejniczak, E.T. & Fesik, S.W. (1994). A computer-based protocol for semiautomated assignments and 3D structure determination of proteins. J. Biomol. NMR 4, 79-96.
26. Malliavin, T.E., Rouh, A., Delsuc, M.A. & Lallemand, J.-Y. (1992). Approche directe de la détermination de structures moléculaires à partir de l'effet Overhauser nucléaire. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris 315, 653-659. [Title translation: Direct approach to the determination of molecular structure from the nuclear Overhauser effect]
27. Oshiro, C.M. & Kuntz, I.D. (1993). Application of distance geometry to the proton assignment problem. Biopolymers 33, 107-115.
28. 15N separated NOE data: a novel real space ab initio approach. J. Mol. Biol. 243, 696-718.
29. Nilges, M., Habazettl, J., Brünger, A.T. & Holak, T.A. (1991). Relaxation matrix refinement of the solution structure of squash trypsin inhibitor. J. Mol. Biol. 219, 499-510.
30. Kharrat, A., Macias, M.J., Gibson, T., Nilges, M. & Pastore, A. (1995). Structure of the dsRNA binding domain of E. coli RNase III. EMBO J. 14, 3572-3584.
31. Nilges, M. & Brünger, A.T. (1991). Automated assignment of ambiguous crosspeaks in symmetric dimers. J. Cell. Biochem. 15G, CG 422.
32. Folkers, P.J.M., Nilges, M., Folmer, R.H.A., Konings, R.N.H. & Hilbers, C.W. (1994). The solution structure of the Tyr41→His mutant of the single-stranded DNA binding protein encoded by gene V of the filamentous bacteriophage M13. J. Mol. Biol. 236, 229-246.
33. Lee, W., Harvey, T.S., Yin, Y., Yau, P., Litchfield, D. & Arrowsmith, C.H. (1994). Solution structure of the tetrameric minimum transforming domain of p53. Nat Struct. Biol. 1, 877-890.
34. Xu, G.Y., et al., & Harvey, T.S. (1995). Solution structure of a cellulose-binding domain from cellulomonas fimi by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Biochemistry 34, 6993-7009.
35. Folmer, R.H.A., Nilges, M., Folkers, P.J.M., Konings, R.N.H. & Hilbers, C.W. (1995). A model of the complex between single-stranded DNA and the single-stranded DNA binding protein encoded by gene V of filamentous bacteriophage M13. J. Mol. Biol. 240, 341-357.
36. Folmer, R.H.A., Nilges, M., Konings, R.N.H. & Hilbers, C.W. (1995). Solution structure of the single-stranded DNA binding protein of bacteriophage Pf3. EMBO J. 14, 4132-4142.
37. 1H NMR assignments and secondary structure in solution of escherichia coli trp repressor. Biochemistry 29, 6332-6341.
38. Weiss, M.A. (1990). Distinguishing symmetry-related intramolecular and intermolecular nuclear overhauser effects in a protein by asymmetric isotopic labelling. J. Magn. Reson. 86, 626-632.
39. Folkers, P.J.M., Folmer, R.H.A., Konings, R.N.H. & Hilbers, C.W. (1993). Overcoming the ambiguity problem encountered in the analysis of nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of symmetric dimer proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115, 3798-3799.
40. O'Donoghue, S.I., King, G.F. & Nilges, M. (1996). Calculation of symmetric multimer structures from NMR data using a priori knowledge of the monomer structure, co-monomer restraints, and interface mapping: the case of leucine zippers. J. Biomol. NMR 8, 193-206.
41. Haenggi, G. & Braun, W. (1994). Pattern recognition and self-correcting distance geometry calculations applied to myohemerythrin. FEBS Lett. 344, 147-153.
42. Nilges, M., Macias, M.J., O'Donoghue, S.I. & Oschkinat, H. (1997). Automated NOESY interpretation with ambiguous distance restraints: the refined NMR solution structure of the pleckstrin homology domain from β-spectrin. J. Mol. Biol. 269, 408-422.
43. Musco, G., et al., & Pastore, A. (1996). Three-dimensional structure and stability of the KH domain: molecular insights into the fragile X syndrome. Cell 85, 237-246.
44. Hyvönen, M., Macias, M.J., Nilges, M., Oschkinat, H., Saraste, M. & Wilmanns, M. (1995). Structure of the binding site for inositol phosphates in a PH domain. EMBO J. 14, 4676-4685.
45. Vriend, G. & Sander, C. (1993). Quality control of protein models: directional atomic contact analysis. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26, 47-60.
46. Morris, A.L., MacArthur, M.W., Hutchinson, E.G. & Thornton, J. (1992). Stereochemical quality of protein structure co-ordinates. Proteins 12, 345-364.
47. Sippl, M.J. (1993). Recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Proteins 17, 355-362.
48. Blaney, J. (1991). A distance geometry-based approach for docking conformationally flexible molecules from 2D or 3D-chemical data-bases. In Abstracts of Papers of the American Chemical Society, Fourth Chemical Congress of North America, vol. 202, p. CINF 28, New York.
49. Brünger, A.T., Kuriyan, J. & Karplus, M. (1987). Crystallographic R factor refinement by molecular dynamics. Science 235, 458-460.