Measuring Leadership in Self-Managed Teams Using the Competing Values Framework

Journal of Engineering Education

Volumn 98, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 273-282

  Zafft, Carmen R ^a   Adams, Stephanie G ^b   Matkin, Gina S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Leadership; Team effectiveness; Teams

Indexed keywords

CURRICULA; EDUCATION; NETWORK FUNCTION VIRTUALIZATION; STUDENTS;

BEHAVIORAL COMPLEXITY; COMPETING VALUES FRAMEWORKS; ENGINEERING EDUCATORS; LEADERSHIP; MANAGERIAL BEHAVIOR; TEAM EFFECTIVENESS; TEAM PROJECTS; TEAMS;

HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 68949200952     PISSN: 10694730     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01024.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission. 2008. Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. Effective for evaluations during the 2008-2009 accreditation cycle, http://www.abet.org/forms.shtml (last accessed April 2009).
2. Adams, S.G. 2003. Building successful student teams in the engineering classroom. fournal of STEM Education 4 (3/4): 1-6.
3. Adams, S.G., L.C Simon Vena, and Ulloa B. 2002. A pilot study of the performance of student teams in engineering education. In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Conference. Montreal, Canada.
4. Bahner, B. 1996. Report: Curricula need product realization. ASME News 15 (10): 1-6.
5. Barry, D. 1991. Managing the bossless team: Lessons in distributed leadership. OrganizationalDynamics 20 (1): 31-47.
6. Belasen, A.T. 1997. An application of the competing values framework to self-managed teams. Current Topics in Management 2:79-111.
7. Cameron, K.S., and R.E. Quinn. 1999. Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the Competing Values Framework. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
8. Cox, J.F., C.L. Pearce, and M.L. Perry, eds. 2003. Toward a model of shared leadership and distributed influence in the innovation process: How shared leadership can enhance new product development team dynamics and effectiveness. In Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
9. Fisher, K. 1993. Leading self-directed work teams: A guide to developing new team leadership, New York McGraw-Hill.
10. Garavan, T.N., M. Morley, and M. Flynn. 1997. 360 degree feedback Its role in employee development, Journal of Management Development 16 (2): 134-147
11. Gardner, P.D. 2001. Job opportunities for the next 30 years. The Black Collegian (April): 54-58.
12. Hart S.L., and R.E. Quinn. 1993. Roles executives play: CEOs, behavioral complexity, and firm performance. Human Relations 46 (5): 543-574
13. Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
14. Hurley, S. 1998. Application of team-based 360° feedback systems. Team Performance Management 4 (5): 202-210
15. Imbrie, P.K., S.J. Mailer., and J.C Immekus. 2005. Assessing team effectiveness. In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Conference. Portland, Oregon.
16. Lawrence, K.A., R.E. Quinn, and P. Lenk. 2009. Behavioral complexity in leadership: The psychometric properties of a new instrument to measure behavioral repertoire. Leadership Quarterly 20 (2): 87-102.
17. Lewis, P., D. Aldridge, and P.M. Swamidass. 1998. Assessing teaming skills acquisition on undergraduate project teams. Journal of Engineering Education 87 (2): 149-155
18. Moore, T.J., H. Diefes-Dux, and P.K. Imbrie. 2006. Assessment of team effectiveness during complex mathematical modeling tasks. In Proceedings of the ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. San Diego, CA.
19. Natishan, M.E., L.C. Schmidt, and P. Mead. 2000. Student focus group results on student team performance issues, Journal of Engineering Education (3): 269-272
20. Pearce, C.L., and J.A. Conger, eds. 2003. Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys ofleadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Quinn, R.E. Beyond rational management. 1988. San Francisco: JosseyBass.
21. Quinn, R.E., S.R. Faerman, M.P. Thompson, and M.R. McGrath. 1996. Becoming a master manager: A competency framework. New York John Wiley & Sons.
22. Salas, E., K.C Stagl, C.S. Burke, and G.F. Goodwin. 2007. Fostering team effectiveness in organizations: Toward an integrative theoretical framework In Modeling complex systems, eds. J.W. Shuart, B. Shuart, W. Spaulding, and J. Poland. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
23. Shamir, B., and Y. Lapidot. 2003. Shared leadership in the management of group boundaries: A study of expulsions from officers' training courses. In Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership, eds. CL. Pearce and J.A. Conger. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
24. Susman, G.I. 1976. Autonomy at work A socio-technical analysis of participative management. New York Praeger.
25. Zaccaro, S.J. 2001. The nature of executive leadership: A conceptual and empirical analysis of success. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.