Assessment of knowledge and competencies related to implant dentistry in undergraduate and postgraduate university education

European Journal of Dental Education

Volumn 13, Issue SUPPL1., 2009, Pages 55-65

  Mattheos, N ^a   Ucer, C ^b   Van De Velde, T ^c   Nattestad, A ^d  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^d UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Clinical competencies; Dental education; Examination; Implant dentistry; Knowledge. School of Medicine and Oral Health; Postgraduate; Skills; Undergraduate

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; CURRICULUM; DENTAL EDUCATION; EDUCATION; EUROPE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PLASTIC SURGERY; STANDARD; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CURRICULUM; DENTAL IMPLANTATION; EDUCATION, DENTAL; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; EUROPE; HUMANS; PROSTHODONTICS; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 68949180101     PISSN: 13965883     EISSN: 16000579     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2008.00546.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Oliver R, Kersten H, Vinkka-Puhakka H. Curriculum structure: principles and strategy. Eur J Dent Educ 2008: 12(Suppl. 1): 74-84.
2. Hobson R, Rolland S, Rotgans J, et al. Quality assurance, benchmarking, assessment and mutual international recognition of qualifications. Eur J Dent Educ 2008: 12(Suppl. 1): 92-100.
3. Brown G, Bull J, Pendlebury M. Peer and self-assessment. In: Assessing student learning in higher education. London: Routledge, 1997: 170-184.
4. Wagner ED. In support of a functioning definition of interaction. Am J Distance Educ 1994: 8: 6-29.
5. Mattheos N. Information technology and interaction in learning. Studies of applications in academic oral health education. PhD Dissertation, Malmö University, 2004 ISBN 91-628-5980-5983
6. Waas V, van der Vleuten J. Assessment of clinical competence. Lancet 2001: 357: 945-949.
7. Department of Health. Foundation learning programme. UK: Modernising Medical Careers, Department of Health, 2008. Available at: http://www. foundationprogramme.nhs.uk/download.asp?file=learning-portfolio.pdf
8. Department of Health. Foundation learning programme. UK: Modernising Medical Careers, Department of Health, 2008. Available at: http://www. foundationprogramme.nhs.uk/download.asp?file=Rough-Guide-lr.pdf
9. Postgraduate Medical Education and Training Board, UK. Workplace based assessment. A paper from the PMETB workplace based assessment Subcommittee. 2005. Available at: http://www.pmetb.org.uk/media/pdf/3/b/PMETB-workplace-based- assemment-paper-(2005).pdf
10. Evans AW. Assessing competence in surgical dentistry. Br Dent J 2001: 190: 7: 343-346.
11. Schwarz MR, Wojtczak A Evaluation of learning outcomes: assessment methods and measurement instrument working review. Publication of the Center for Medical Education Research and Development, West China Center of Medical Sciences, Sichuan University, 2003, pp. 72-81. Available at: http://www.iime.org/documents/elo.htm
12. Downing SM. Validity: on the meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Med Educ 2003: 37: 830-837.
13. Downing SM. Reliability: on the reproducibility of assessment data. Med Educ 2004: 38: 1006-1012.
14. Miller G. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med 1990: 65(Suppl.): S63-S67.
15. Norcini JJ, Blank LL, Arnold GK, Kimball HR. The mini-CEX (clinical evaluation exercise): a preliminary investigation. Ann Intern Med 1995: 123: 795-799.
16. Schuwirth LWT, van der Vleuten J. Different written assessment methods: what can be said about their strengths and weaknesses? Med Educ 2004: 38: 974-979.
17. Schuwirth LWT, van der Vleuten J. The use of clinical simulations in assessment. Med Educ 2003: 37(Suppl. 1): 65-71.
18. Helfer RE, Slater CH. Measuring the process of solving clinical diagnostic problems. Br J Med Educ 1971: 5: 48-52.
19. Farmer EA. Page G. A practical guide to assessing clinical decisionmaking skills using the key features approach. Med Educ 2005: 39: 1188-1194.
20. Case SM, Swanson DB. Extended-matching items: a practical alternative to free response questions. Teach Learn Med 1993: 5: 107-115.
21. Schittek Janda M, Mattheos N, Nattestad A, et al. Simulation of patient encounters using a virtual patient in periodontology instruction of dental students: design, usability, and learning effect in historytaking skills. Eur J Dent Educ 2004: 8: 111-119.
22. Ladyshewsky R, Gotjamanos E. Communication skill development in health professional education: the use of standardised patients. J Allied Health 1997: 26: 177-186.
23. Schoonheim-Klein M. The use of Objective Structured Clinical Examination in dental education. Doctoral Dissertation, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Amsterdam, 2008. ISBN: 978-90-6464-237-1.
24. Harden RM, Gleeson FA. Assessment of clinical competence using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Med Educ 1979: 13: 41-54.
25. Gerrow JD, Murphy HJ, Boyd MA, Scott DA. Concurrent validity of written and OSCE components of the Canadian dental certification examinations. J Dent Educ 2003: 67: 896-901.
26. Schoonheim-Klein M, Muijtens A, Habets L, et al. On the reliability of a dental OSCE, using SEM: effect of different days. Eur J Dent Educ 2008: 12: 131-137.
27. Van de Velde T, Glor F, De Bruyn H. A model study on flapless implant placement by clinicians with a different level in implant surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008: 19: 66-72.
28. Youngblood PL, Srivastava S, Curet M, et al. Comparison of training on two laparoscopic simulators and assessment of skills transfer to surgical performance. J Am Coll Surg 2005: 200: 546-551.
29. Petrin P, Baggio E, Spisni R, Rulli F. Use of virtual reality simulator in the training of postgraduated surgical residents. Ann Ital Chir 2006: 77: 465-468.
30. von Sternberg N, Bartsch MS, Petersik A. Learning by doing virtually. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007: 36: 386-390.
31. Kusumoto N, Sohmura T, Yamada S, et al. Application of virtual reality force feedback haptic device for oral implant surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006: 17: 708-713.
32. Buchanan JA. Experience with virtual reality-based technology in teaching restorative dental procedures. J Dent Educ 2004: 68: 1258-1265.
33. Al-Qareer AH, Afsah MR, Müller HP. A sheep cadaver model for demonstration and training periodontal surgical methods. Eur J Dent Educ 2004: 8: 78-83.
34. Hemmings KW, Clark C, Kieser JB. A model for teaching periodontal surgery. Br Dent J 1990: 168: 401-402.
35. Prescott-Clements L, Felix DH, Hurst Y et al. A curriculum for UK Dental Foundation Programme Training. Committee of postgraduate Dental Deans and Directors, Department of Health, UK, 2005. Available at: http://www.fgdp.org.uk/ pdf/gpt-curric.pdf
36. Scottish Deans' Medical Curriculum Group. Scottish Doctor: Undergraduate Learning outcomes and their assessment: a foundation for competent and reflective practitioners. University of Edinburgh: Scottish Deans' Medical Curriculum Group, 2002. Available at: http://www.scottishdoctor.org
37. Ucer TC. Foundation Portfolio for the Diploma/MSc Programme in Dental Implantology. Salford: University of Salford, 2008. Available at: http://www.oral-implants.com/Foundation PortfolioUniversity of Salford.pdf
38. Mossey PA, Newton JP. The structured clinical operative test (SCOT) in dental competency assessment. Br Dent J 2001: 190: 387-390.
39. Bousdras V, Aghabeigi B, Petrie A, Evans AW. Assessment of surgical skills in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004: 19: 542-548.
40. Turnbull J, MacFadyen J, Van-Barneveld C, Norman G. Clinical work sampling. A new approach to the problem of in-training evaluation. J Gen Intern Med 2000: 15: 556-561.
41. Ram P, Grol R, Rethans JJ, Schouten B, Van der Vleuten CPM, Kester A. Assessment of general practitioners by video observation of communicative and medical performance in daily practice: issues of validity, reliability and feasibility. Med Educ 1999: 33: 447-454.
42. Massagli TL, Carline JD. Reliability of a 360-degree evaluation to assess resident competence. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2007: 86: 845-852.
43. Morton J, Cumming A, Cameron H. Performance-based assessment in undergraduate medical education. Clin Teacher 2007: 4: 36-41.
44. Mattheos N, Nattestad A, Falk Nillson E, Attstrom R. The interactive examination: assessing students' self-assessment ability. Med Educ 2004: 38: 378-389.
45. Evans AW, Aghabeigi B, Leeson RM, O'Sullivan C, Eliahoo J. Assessment of surgeon competency to remove mandibular third molar teeth. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002: 31: 434-438.
46. Evans AW, Aghabeigi B, Leeson R, O'Sullivan C, Eliahoo J. Are we really as good as we think we are? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2002: 84: 54-56.
47. Swanson D, Norman G. Performance-based assessment. Edu Res 2001: 5: 11-24.
48. Pietroni R, Palmer A. Portfolio learning and the role of mentors. Educ Gen Pract 1995: 6: 111-114.
49. Driessen E, van der Vleuten C, Schuwirth L, van Tartwijk J, Vermunt J. The use of qualitative research criteria for portfolio assessment as an alternative to reliability evaluation: a case study. Med Educ 2005: 39: 214-220.
50. Pitts J, Coles C, Thomas P, Smith F. Enhancing reliability in portfolio assessment: discussion between assessors. Med Teach 2002: 24: 197-201.
51. Rees CE, Sheard CE. The reliability of assessment criteria for undergraduate medical students' communication skills portfolios: the Nottingham experience. Med Educ 2004: 38: 138-144.