Reconstruction and stability of secondary structure elements in the context of protein structure prediction

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 96, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 4399-4408

  Podtelezhnikov, Alexei A ^a,b,d   Wild, David L ^a,c  

^a KECK GRADUATE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^d MERCK RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHYMOTRYPSIN INHIBITOR; COLD SHOCK PROTEIN; HYDROGEN; PROTEIN G; PROTEIN SH3; BACTERIAL PROTEIN; CHYMOTRYPSIN INHIBITOR 2; COLD SHOCK PROTEIN CSPB, BACTERIA; COLD-SHOCK PROTEIN CSPB, BACTERIA; G SUBSTRATE; G-SUBSTRATE; NERVE PROTEIN; PEPTIDE; PROTEIN TYROSINE KINASE; VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; HYDROGEN BOND; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STABILITY; ROOM TEMPERATURE; ALGORITHM; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ESCHERICHIA COLI; SRC HOMOLOGY DOMAIN; TEMPERATURE;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ESCHERICHIA COLI; HYDROGEN BONDING; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NERVE TISSUE PROTEINS; PEPTIDES; PLANT PROTEINS; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; SRC HOMOLOGY DOMAINS; SRC-FAMILY KINASES; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 68949103669     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: 15420086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.02.057     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Fersht, A. R. 2008. From the first protein structures to our current knowledge of protein folding: delights and scepticisms. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9:650-654.
2. Dill, K. A., S. B. Ozkan, M. S. Shell, and T. R. Weikl. 2008. The protein folding problem. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 37:289-316.
3. McCammon, J. A., and S. C. Harvey. 1987. Dynamics of Proteins and Nucleic Acids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; NewYork.
4. Leach, A. R. 2001. Molecular Modelling: Principles and Applications. Prentice Hall, Harlow, UK; New York.
5. Bowie, J. U., R. Luthy, and D. Eisenberg. 1991. A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science. 253:164-170.
6. Jones, D. T., W. R. Taylor, and J. M. Thornton. 1992. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature. 358:86-89.
7. Blundell, T. L., B. L. Sibanda, M. J. Sternberg, and J. M. Thornton. 1987. Knowledge-based prediction of protein structures and the design of novel molecules. Nature. 326:347-352.
8. Sali, A., J. P. Overington, M. S. Johnson, and T. L. Blundell. 1990. From comparisons of protein sequences and structures to protein modelling and design. Trends Biochem. Sci. 15:235-240.
9. Huang, E. S., R. Samudrala, and J. W. Ponder. 1999. Ab initio fold prediction of small helical proteins using distance geometry and knowledge-based scoring functions. J. Mol. Biol. 290:267-281.
10. Soman, K. V., and W. Braun. 2001. Determining the three-dimensional fold of a protein from approximate constraints: a simulation study. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 34:283-304.
11. Vendruscolo, M., E. Kussell, and E. Domany. 1997. Recovery of protein structure from contact maps. Fold. Des. 2:295-306.
12. Ortiz, A. R., A. Kolinski, and J. Skolnick. 1998. Nativelike topology assembly of small proteins using predicted restraints in Monte Carlo folding simulations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:1020-1025.
13. Go, N. 1983. Theoretical studies of protein folding. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng. 12:183-210.
14. Takada, S. 1999. Go-ing for the prediction of protein folding mechanisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96:11698-11700.
15. Baldwin, R. L., and G. D. Rose. 1999. Is protein folding hierarchic? I. Local structure and peptide folding. Trends Biochem. Sci. 24:26-33.
16. Baldwin, R. L., and G. D. Rose. 1999. Is protein folding hierarchic? II. Folding intermediates and transition states. Trends Biochem. Sci. 24:77-83.
17. Podtelezhnikov, A. A., and D. L. Wild. 2005. Exhaustive Metropolis Monte Carlo sampling and analysis of polyalanine conformations adopted under the influence of hydrogen bonds. Proteins. 61:94-104.
18. Rose, G. D., P. J. Fleming, J. R. Banavar, and A. Maritan. 2006. A backbone-based theory of protein folding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103:16623-16633.
19. Hinton, G. E. 2002. Training products of experts by minimizing contrastive divergence. Neural Comput. 14:1771-1800.
20. Podtelezhnikov, A. A., Z. Ghahramani, and D. L. Wild. 2007. Learning about protein hydrogen bonding by minimizing contrastive divergence. Proteins. 66:588-599.
21. Phillips, D. C. 1970. The development of crystallographic enzymology. Biochem. Soc. Symp. 31:11-28.
22. Gobel, U., C. Sander, R. Schneider, and A. Valencia. 1994. Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins. Proteins. 18:309-317.
23. Pollastri, G., and P. Baldi. 2002. Prediction of contact maps by GIOHMMs and recurrent neural networks using lateral propagation from all four cardinal corners. Bioinformatics. 18 (Suppl 1):S62-S70.
24. Chu, W., Z. Ghahramani, A. Podtelezhnikov, and D. L. Wild. 2006. Bayesian segmental models with multiple sequence alignment profiles for protein secondary structure and contact map prediction. IEEE/ ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 3:98-113.
25. Engh, R. A., and R. Huber. 1991. Accurate bond and angle parameters for x-ray protein-structure refinement. Acta Crystallogr. A. 47:392-400.
26. Engh, R.A., and R. Huber. 2001. Structure quality and target parameters. In International Tables for Crystallography. M.G. Rossman and E. Arnold, editors. Kluwer Academic Publishers for the International Union of Crystallography, Dordrecht, Boston, London. 382-392.
27. Hopfinger, A. J. 1973. Conformational Properties of Macromolecules. Academic Press, New York.
28. Murzin, A. G., S. E. Brenner, T. Hubbard, and C. Chothia. 1995. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol. 247:536-540.
29. Brenner, S. E., P. Koehl, and M. Levitt. 2000. The ASTRAL compendium for protein structure and sequence analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:254-256.
30. Altschul, S. F., T. L. Madden, A. A. Schaffer, J. Zhang, Z. Zhang, et al. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389-3402.
31. Ostendorf, M., V. V. Digalakis, and O. A. Kimball. 1996. From HMM's to segment models: a unified view of stochastic modeling for speech recognition. IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 4:360-378.
32. Schmidler, S. C., J. S. Liu, and D. L. Brutlag. 2000. Bayesian segmentation of protein secondary structure. J. Comput. Biol. 7:233-248.
33. Berman, H. M., J. Westbrook, Z. Feng, G. Gilliland, T. N. Bhat, et al. 2000. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:235-242.
34. Sippl, M. J. 1995. Knowledge-based potentials for proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 5:229-235.
35. Fleming, P. J., and G. D. Rose. 2005. Do all backbone polar groups in proteins form hydrogen bonds? Protein Sci. 14:1911-1917.
36. Millhauser, G. L., C. J. Stenland, P. Hanson, K. A. Bolin, and F. J. M. van de Ven. 1997. Estimating the relative populations of 3(10)-helix and α-helix in Ala-rich peptides: a hydrogen exchange and high field NMR study. J. Mol. Biol. 267:963-974.
37. Kolinski, A., and J. Skolnick. 1998. Assembly of protein structure from sparse experimental data: an efficient Monte Carlo model. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 32:475-494.
38. Sheinerman, F. B., and C. L. Brooks. 1998. Calculations on folding of segment B1 of streptococcal protein G. J. Mol. Biol. 278:439-456.
39. Shimada, J., and E. I. Shakhnovich. 2002. The ensemble folding kinetics of protein G from an all-atom Monte Carlo simulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:11175-11180.
40. Sali, A., E. Shakhnovich, and M. Karplus. 1994. How does a protein fold? Nature. 369:248-251.
41. McPhalen, C. A., and M. N. James. 1987. Crystal and molecular structure of the serine proteinase inhibitor CI-2 from barley seeds. Biochemistry. 26:261-269.
42. Yu, H., M. K. Rosen, T. B. Shin, C. Seidel-Dugan, J. S. Brugge, et al. 1992. Solution structure of the SH3 domain of Src and identification of its ligand-binding site. Science. 258:1665-1668.
43. Schindelin, H., W. Jiang, M. Inouye, and U. Heinemann. 1994. Crystal structure of CspA, the major cold shock protein of Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 91:5119-5123.
44. Munoz, V., and W. A. Eaton. 1999. A simple model for calculating the kinetics of protein folding from three-dimensional structures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96:11311-11316.
45. Shea, J. E., and C. L. Brooks, 3rd. 2001. From folding theories to folding proteins: a review and assessment of simulation studies of protein folding and unfolding. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 52:499-535.
46. Creamer, T. P., and G. D. Rose. 1995. Interactions between hydrophobic side chains within α-helices. Protein Sci. 4:1305-1314.
47. Luo, P., and R. L. Baldwin. 2002. Origin of the different strengths of the (i,i+4) and (i,i+3) leucine pair interactions in helices. Biophys. Chem. 96:103-108.
48. Xiong, H., B. L. Buckwalter, H. M. Shieh, and M. H. Hecht. 1995. Periodicity of polar and nonpolar amino acids is the major determinant of secondary structure in self-assembling oligomeric peptides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 92:6349-6353.
49. Vendruscolo, M., R. Najmanovich, and E. Domany. 2000. Can a pairwise contact potential stabilize native protein folds against decoys obtained by threading? Proteins. 38:134-148.
50. Crippen, G. M. 2005. Recognizing protein folds by cluster distance geometry. Proteins. 60:82-89.
51. Richardson, J. S., and D. C. Richardson. 1988. Amino acid preferences for specific locations at the ends of a helices. Science. 240:1648-1652.
52. Richardson, J. S., and D. C. Richardson. 2002. Natural β-sheet proteins use negative design to avoid edge-to-edge aggregation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:2754-2759.
53. Kamat, A. P., and A. M. Lesk. 2007. Contact patterns between helices and strands of sheet define protein folding patterns. Proteins. 66:869-876.
54. Humphrey, W., A. Dalke, and K. Schulten. 1996. VMD: Visual Molecular Dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33-38, 27-38.
55. Frishman, D., and P. Argos. 1995. Knowledge-based protein secondary structure assignment. Proteins. 23:566-579.