Biochemical recurrence rate in patients with positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy with further negative resected tissue

BJU International

Volumn 104, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 605-610

  Rabbani, Farhang ^a   Vora, Kinjal C ^a   Yunis, Luis Herran ^a   Eastham, James A ^a   Guillonneau, Bertrand ^a   Scardino, Peter T ^a   Touijer, Karim ^a  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Frozen sections; Margin; Pathology; Prostatectomy; Prostatic neoplasms

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ARTICLE; BIOCHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOLLOW UP; FROZEN SECTION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROSTATE; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; RECURRENCE RISK; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; FROZEN SECTIONS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM, RESIDUAL; PROGNOSIS; PROSTATE; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 68849111794     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08757.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Yossepowitch O, Bjartell A, Eastham JA et al. Positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy: outlining problem and its long-term consequences. Eur Urol 2008 55 : 87 99
2. Van der Kwast TH, Bolla M, Van Poppel H et al. Identification of patients with prostate cancer who benefit from immediate postoperative radiotherapy: EORTC 22911. J Clin Oncol 2007 25 : 4178 86
3. Thompson IM, Tangen CM, Paradelo J et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathological T3N0M0 prostate cancer significantly reduces risk of metastases and improves survival: long-term followup of a randomized clinical trial. J Urol 2009 181 : 956 62
4. Stamey TA, Villers AA, McNeal JE, Link PC, Freiha FS. Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy: importance of the apical dissection. J Urol 1990 143 : 1166 72
5. Ohori M, Wheeler TM, Kattan MW, Goto Y, Scardino PT. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 1995 154 : 1818 24
6. Srigley JR. Key issues in handling and reporting radical prostatectomy specimens. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2006 130 : 303 17
7. Rabbani F, Bastar A, Fair WR. Site specific predictors of positive margins at radical prostatectomy: an argument for risk based modification of technique. J Urol 1998 160 : 1727 33
8. Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M, Members of the VIP Team. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int 2003 92 : 205 10
9. Epstein JI. Evaluation of radical prostatectomy capsular margins of resection. The significance of margins designated as negative, closely approaching, and positive. Am J Surg Pathol 1990 14 : 626 32
10. Bong GW, Ritenour CW, Osunkoya AO, Smith MT, Keane TE. Evaluation of modern pathological criteria for positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens and their use for predicting biochemical recurrence. BJU Int 2009 103 : 327 31
11. Ponthieu A, Delgrande J, Granger F, Bonneau HP, Ivaldi A. Le contrôle histologique extemporané des marges dans la prostatectomie pour cancer. J Urol (Paris) 1993 99 : 67 72
12. Eichelberg C, Erbersdobler A, Haese A et al. Frozen section for the management of intraoperatively detected palpable tumor lesions during nerve-sparing scheduled radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2006 49 : 1011 6
13. Cangiano TG, Litwin MS, Naitoh J, Dorey F, deKernion JB. Intraoperative frozen section monitoring of nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 1999 162 : 655 8
14. Goharderakhshan RZ, Sudilovsky D, Carroll LA, Grossfeld GD, Marn R, Carroll PR. Utility of intraoperative frozen section analysis of surgical margins in region of neurovascular bundles at radical prostatectomy. Urology 2002 59 : 709 14
15. Bianco FJ Scardino PT, Eastham JA. Radical prostatectomy: long-term cancer control and recovery of sexual and urinary function ('trifecta'). Urology 2005 66 : 83 94
16. Ohori M, Kattan MW, Koh H et al. Predicting the presence and side of extracapsular extension: a nomogram for staging prostate cancer. J Urol 2004 171 : 1844 9
17. Chuang AY, Nielsen ME, Hernandez DJ, Walsh PC, Epstein JI. The significance of positive surgical margin in areas of capsular incision in otherwise organ confined disease at radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2007 178 : 1306 10
18. Fromont G, Baumert H, Cathelineau X, Rozet F, Validire P, Vallancien G. Intraoperative frozen section analysis during nerve sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: feasibility study. J Urol 2003 170 : 1843 6
19. Nakamura K, Kasraeian A, Anai S, Pendleton J, Rosser CJ. Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy: importance of intra-operative bladder neck frozen sections. Int Braz J Urol 2007 33 : 746 51
20. Dillenburg W, Poulakis V, Witzsch U et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the value of intraoperative frozen sections. Eur Urol 2005 48 : 614 21
21. Lepor H, Kaci L. Role of intraoperative biopsies during radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 2004 63 : 499 502
22. Lepor H, Chan S, Melamed J. The role of bladder neck biopsy in men undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy with preservation of the bladder neck. J Urol 1998 160 : 2435 9
23. Shah O, Melamed J, Lepor H. Analysis of apical soft tissue margins during radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 2001 165 : 1943 8
24. Fasolis G, Degiuli P, Lancia M et al. Periprostatic tissues intraoperative frozen section during retrograde radical retropubic prostatectomy. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2006 78 : 107 11
25. Tsuboi T, Ohori M, Kuroiwa K et al. Is intraoperative frozen section analysis an efficient way to reduce positive surgical margins? Urology 2005 66 : 1287 91
26. Kübler HR, Szukala SA, Madden JF et al. Apical soft tissue biopsies predict biochemical failure in radical perineal prostatectomy patients with apical cancer involvement. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2007 10 : 72 6