Is intraoperative frozen section analysis an efficient way to reduce positive surgical margins?

Urology

Volumn 66, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 1287-1291

  Tsuboi, Toshiki ^a   Ohori, Makoto ^a   Kuroiwa, Kentaro ^a   Reuter, Victor E ^a   Kattan, Michael W ^a   Eastham, James A ^a   Scardino, Peter T ^a  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FROZEN SECTION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; FROZEN SECTIONS; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE CARE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 29144501484     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.06.073     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. J.A. Wieder, M.S. Soloway Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer J Urol 160 1998 299 315
2. M. Ohori, P.T. Scardino Localized prostate cancer Curr Probl Surg 39 2002 833 957
3. J. Epstein, G. Pizov, P.C. Walsh Correlation of pathologic findings with progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy Cancer 71 1993 3582 3593
4. M. Ohori, T.M. Wheeler, M.W. Kattan Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens J Urol 154 1995 1818 1824
5. R.Z. Goharderakhshan, D. Sudilovsky, L.A. Carroll Utility of intraoperative FS analysis of surgical margins in region of neurovascular bundles at radical prostatectomy Urology 59 2002 709 714
6. T.G. Cangiano, M.S. Litwin, J. Naitoh Intraoperative FS monitoring of nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy J Urol 162 1999 655 658
7. O. Shah, J. Melamed, H. Lepor Analysis of apical soft tissue margins during radical retropubic prostatectomy J Urol 165 2001 1943 1948
8. F. Rabbani, A. Bastar, W.R. Fair Site specific predictors of positive margins at radical prostatectomy an argument for risk based modification of technique J Urol 160 1998 1727 1733
9. J.I. Epstein Incidence and significance of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens Urol Clin North Am 23 1996 651 663
10. J.A. Eastham, M.W. Kattan, E. Riedel Variations among individual surgeons in the rate of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens J Urol 170 2003 2292 2295
11. G.W. Hull, F. Rabbani, F. Abbas Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients J Urol 167 2002 528 534