Quantitation of mandibular ramus volume as a source of bone grafting

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 11, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2009, Pages

  Verdugo, Fernando ^a,b   Simonian, Krikor ^b   McDonald, Roberto Smith ^b   Nowzari, Hessam ^b  

^a VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

AutoCAD; Bone graft; Ramus

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MALE; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHY; STATISTICS; TRANSPLANTATION;

ADULT; AGED; BONE DENSITY; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MIDDLE AGED; SOFTWARE; TISSUE AND ORGAN HARVESTING; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 68749122461     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00172.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Canalis E. Effect of growth factors on bone cell replication and differentiation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985 193 : 246 263.
2. Reddi AH, Wientroub S, Muthukumaran N. Biologic principles of bone induction. Orthop Clin North Am 1987 18 : 207 212.
3. Zins JE, Whitaker LA. Membranous vs endochondral bone autografts: implications for craniofacial reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983 72 : 778 785.
4. Ozaki W, Buchman SR. Volume maintenance of onlay bone grafts in the craniofacial skeleton: micro-architecture versus embryologic origin. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998 102 : 291 299.
5. Jensen J, Sindet-Pedersen S. Autogenous mandibular bone grafts and osseointegrated implants for reconstruction of the severely atrophied maxilla. A preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991 49 : 1277 1287.
6. Williamson RA. Rehabilitation of the resorbed maxilla and mandible using autogenous bone grafts and osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996 11 : 476 488.
7. Albrektsson T. Repair of bone grafts. A vital microscopic and histologic investigation in the rabbit. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1980 14 : 1 12.
8. Güngörmüs M, Yilmaz AB, Ertas U, Akgul HM, Yavuz MS, Harorli A. Evaluation of the mandible as an alternative autogenous bone source for oral and maxillofacial reconstruction. J Int Med Res 2002 30 : 260 264.
9. Güngörmüs M, Yavuz MS. The ascending ramus of the mandible as a donor site in maxillofacial bone grafting. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002 60 : 1316 1318.
10. Verdugo F, Simonian K, Smith McDonald R, Nowzari H. Quantification of mandibular symphysis volume as a source of bone grafting. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009 DOI 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00140.x. [Epub ahead of print]
11. Lu M, Rabie AB. Quantitative assessment of early healing of intramembranous and endochondral autogenous bone grafts using micro-computed tomography and Q-win image analyzer. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004 33 : 369 376.
12. Buchman SR, Sherick DG, Goulet RW, Goldstein SA. Use of microcomputed tomography scanning as a new technique for the evaluation of membranous bone. J Craniofac Surg 1998 9 : 48 54.
13. Feldcamp LA, Goldstein SA, Parfitt AM, Jesion G, Kleerekoper M. The direct examination of three-dimensional bone architecture in vitro by computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res 1989 4 : 3 11.
14. Kuhn JL, Goldstein SA, Feldkamp LA, Goulet RW, Jesion G. Evaluation of a microcomputed tomography system to study trabecular bone structure. J Orthop Res 1990 8 : 833 842.
15. Peker I, Alkurt MT, Mihcioglu T. The use of 3 different imaging methods for the localization of the mandibular canal in dental implant planning. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008 23 : 463 470.
16. Ito K, Yoshinuma N, Goke E, Arai Y, Shinoda K. Clinical application of a new compact computed tomography system for evaluating the outcome of regenerative therapy: a case report. J Periodontol 2001 72 : 696 702. (Pubitemid 33606336)
17. Bhatavadekar NB, Paquette DW. Long-term follow-up and tomographic assessment of an intrabony defect treated with enamel matrix derivative. J Periodontol 2008 79 : 1802 1808.
18. Rajchel J, Ellis E, Fonseca RJ. The anatomical location of the mandibular canal: its relationship to the sagittal ramus osteotomy. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1986 1 : 37 47.
19. Nishioka GJ, Zysset MK, Van Sickels JE. Neurosensory disturbance with rigid fixation of the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987 45 : 20 26.
20. Rosenberg A, Sailer HF. A prospective study on changes in the sensibility of oral mucosa and the mucosa of the upper lip after Le Fort I osteotomy. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1994 22 : 286 290.
21. Jacks SC, Zuniga JR, Turvey TA, Schalit C. A retrospective analysis of lingual nerve sensory changes after mandibular bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998 56 : 700 704.
22. Cunningham LL, Tiner BD, Clarck GM, Bays RA, Keeling SD, Rugh JD. A comparison of questionnaire versus monofilament assessment of neurosensory deficit. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996 54 : 454 460.
23. Clavero J, Lundgren S. Ramus or chin grafts for maxillary sinus inlay and local onlay augmentation: comparison of donor site morbidity and complications. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003 5 : 154 160.
24. Weibull L, Widmark G, Ivanoff CJ, Borg E, Rasmusson L. Morbidity after chin bone harvesting - retrospective a long-term follow-up study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009 DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00102.x. [Epub ahead of print]