Long-term follow-up and tomographic assessment of an intrabony defect treated with enamel matrix derivative

Journal of Periodontology

Volumn 79, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 1802-1808

  Bhatavadekar, Neel B ^a,b,c   Paquette, David W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone regeneration; Case report; Computed tomography; Enamel matrix proteins; Periodontal pocket.

Indexed keywords

ENAMEL MATRIX PROTEINS; ENAMEL PROTEIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE REGENERATION; CASE REPORT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GINGIVA BLEEDING; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; OSTEOLYSIS; PERIODONTAL DISEASE; PERIODONTITIS; PHYSIOLOGY; PLASTIC SURGERY; TOMOGRAPHY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; BONE REGENERATION; DENTAL ENAMEL PROTEINS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GINGIVAL HEMORRHAGE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; OSTEOGENESIS; PERIODONTAL ATTACHMENT LOSS; PERIODONTAL POCKET; SURGICAL FLAPS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 51249102401     PISSN: 00223492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2008.070636     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Heijl L, Heden G, Svärdström G, Ostgren A. Enamel matrix derivative (EMDOGAIN) in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:705-714.
2. Esposito M, Coulthard P, Thomsen P, Worthington HV. Enamel matrix derivative for periodontal tissue regeneration in treatment of intrabony defects: A Cochrane systematic review. J Dent Educ 2004;68:834-844.
3. Kalpidis CDR, Ruben MP. Treatment of intrabony periodontal defects with enamel matrix derivative: A Literature review. J Periodontol 2002;73:1360-1376.
4. Hammarstrom L. Enamel matrix, cementum development and regeneration. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24: 658-668.
5. Cochran D, King GL, Schoolfield J, Velasquez-Plata D, Mellonig JT, Jones A. Effect of enamel matrix proteins on periodontol regeneration as determined by histological analysis. J Periodontol 2003;74:1043-1055.
6. Windisch P, Sculean A, Klein F, et al. Comparison of clinical, radiographic, and histometric measurements following treatment with guided tissue regeneration or enamel matrix proteins in human periodontal defects. J Periodontol 2002;73:409-417.
7. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Coulthard P, Worthington HV. Enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain) for periodontal tissue regeneration in intrabony defects. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;(4):CD003875.
8. Guida L, Annunziata M, Belardo S, Farina R, Scabbia A, Trombelli L. Effect of autogenous cortical bone particulate in conjunction with enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of periodontal intraosseous defects. J Periodontol 2007;78:231-238.
9. Cortellini P, Tonetti M. Clinical performance of a regenerative strategy for intrabony defects: Scientific evidence and clinical experience. J Periodontol 2005; 76:341-350.
10. Mengel R, Candir M, Shiratori K, Flores-de-Jacoby L. Digital volume tomography in the diagnosis of periodontal defects: An in vitro study on native pig and human mandibles. J Periodontol 2005;76:665-673.
11. Ziegler CM, Woertche R, Brief J, Hassfeld S. Clinical indications for digital volume tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002; 31:126-130.
12. Ito K, Yoshinuma N, Goke E, Arai Y, Shinoda K. Clinical application of a new compact computed tomography system for evaluating the outcome of regenerative therapy: A case report. J Periodontol 2001;72:696-702.
13. Sirona Technical data. Available at: http://www.sirona.com/ecomaXL/index. php?site=SIRONA_COM_galileos_ technische_daten. Accessed October 7, 2007.
14. O'Leary TJ, Drake RB, Naylor JE. The plaque control record. J Periodontol 1972;43:38.
15. Nordland WP, Tarnow DP. A classification system for loss of papillary height. J Periodontol 1998;69:1124-1126.
16. Kuru B, Yilmaz S, Argin K, Noyan U. Enamel matrix derivative alone or in combination with a bioactive glass in wide intrabony defects. Clin Oral Investig 2006; 10:227-234.
17. Okuda K, Momose M, Miyazaki A, et al. Enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of human intrabony osseous defects. J Periodontol 2000;71:1821-1828.
18. Venezia E, Goldstein M, Boyan BD, Schwartz Z. The use of enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of periodontal defects: A literature review and metaanalysis. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2004;15:382-402.
19. Mischkowski RA, Ritter L, Neugebauer J, Dreiseidler T, Keeve E, Zöller JE. Diagnostic quality of panoramic views obtained by a newly developed digital volume tomography device for maxillofacial imaging. Quintessence Int 2007;38:763-772.
20. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003;32:229-234.
21. Parodi R, Santarelli GA, Gasparetto B. Treatment of intrabony pockets with Emdogain: Results at 36 months. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004;24: 57-63.
22. Heden G, Wennström JL. Five-year follow-up of regenerative periodontal therapy with enamel matrix derivative at sites with angular bone defects. J Periodontol 2006;77:295-301.
23. Wood DL, Hoag PM, Donnenfeld OW, Rosenfeld LD. Alveolar crest reduction following full and partial thickness flaps. J Periodontol 1972;43:141-144.
24. Osborn JB, Stoltenberg JL, Huso BA, Aeppli DM, Pihlstrom BL. Comparison of measurement variability in subjects with moderate periodontitis using a conventional and constant force periodontal probe. J Periodontol 1992;63:283-289.