How well is reading recovery really working in new zealand? reply to chapman, greaney and tunmer

New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 121-125

  McDowall, Sue ^a  

^a New Zealand Council for Educational Research   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 68549140056     PISSN: 00288276     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Note

References (19)

1. Burroughs-Lange, S. (2006). Evaluation of Reading Recovery in London schools: Every child a reader 2005-2006. London, UK: Institute of Education, University of London. See http://www.everychildareader.org/pubs/ECAR-London- Evaluation-Report.pdf.
2. Center, Y., Wheldall, K., Freeman, L., Outhred, L. & McNaught, M. (1995). An evaluation of Reading Recovery. Reading Research Quaterly, 30(2), 240-263.
3. Chamberlain, M. (2008). PIRLS 2005/2006 in New Zealand: An overview of the national findings from the second cycle of the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS). Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Education.
4. Chapman, J., Greaney, K. & Tunmer, W. (2007). How well is Reading Recovery really working in New Zealand? New Zealand Journal of Education Studies, 42(1&2), 59-71.
5. Chapman, J., Tunmer, W. & Prochnow, J. (2001). Does success in the Reading Recovery program depend on developing proficiency in phonological-processing skills? A longitudinal study in a whole language instructional context. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(2), 141-176.
6. Crooks, T. & Flockton, L. (2005). National Education Monitoring Project reading and speaking assessment results 2004. Otago, NZ: Educational Assessment Research Unit.
7. D'Agostino, J. & Murphy, J. (2004). A meta-analysis of Reading Recovery in United States schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(1), 23-38.
8. Elbaum, B., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M. & Moody, S. (2000). How effective are one-to-one tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at risk of reading failure? A meta-analysis of the intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 605-619.
9. Glynn, T., Crooks, T., Betune, N., Ballard, K. & Smith, J. with Sherrel, J., Crooks, M. & Mohi, L. (1989). Reading Recovery in context. Wellington, NZ: Department of Education.
10. KPMG Foundation. (2008). Every child a reader: The results of the third year. London, UK: KMPG Foundation.
11. Lincoln, Y. (2003). Constructivist knowing, participatory ethics and responsive evaluation: A model for the 21st century. In T. Kellaghan, D. Stufflebeam & L. Wingate (Eds.), International Handbook of Educational Evaluation: Part One: Perspectives, 9,69-78. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
12. McDowall, S., Boyd, S. & Hodgen, E. with van Vliet, T. (2005). Reading Recovery in New Zealand: Uptake, implementation, and outcomes, especially in relation to Māori and Pasifika students. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Education. See http://www.tki.org.nz/r/literacy-numeracy/pdf/ reading-rec-uptake.pdf.
13. Patton, M. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text (3rd Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications.
14. Rhodes-Kline, A. (1997). Sustained effects of Reading Recovery: A review of the literature. Maine, US: Maine University Center for Early Literacy.
15. Schwartz, R. (2005). Literacy learning of at-risk first-grade students in Reading Recovery early intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 257-267.
16. Shanahan, T. & Barr, R. (1995). Reading Recovery: An independent evaluation of the effects of an early instructional intervention for at risk learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(4), 958-995.
17. Stufflebeam, D. (2003). Institutionalizing evaluation in schools. In T. Kellaghan, D. Stufflebeam & L. Wingate (Eds.), Internationalhandbookof 'educational evaluation: Part Two: Practice, 9, 775-805. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
18. Telford, M. & Caygill, R. (2007). PISA 2006: How ready are our 15-year-oldsfor tomorrow's world? Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Education.
19. Tunmer, W. & Chapman, J. (2003). The Reading Recovery approach to preventative early intervention: As good as it gets? Reading Psychology, 24(3&4), 337-360.