How well is reading recovery really working in New Zealand?

New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies

Volumn 42, Issue 1-2, 2007, Pages 17-29

  Chapman, James ^a   Greaney, Keith ^a   Tunmer, William ^a  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 44649157958     PISSN: 00288276     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Au, K.H. (1998). Social constructivism and the school literacy learning of students of diverse backgrounds. Journal of Literacy Research, 30, 279-319.
2. Au, K.H. (2000). A multicultural perspective on policies for improving literacy achievement: Equity and excellence. In R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol III) (pp. 835-851). New York: Erlbaum.
3. Barnes, B.L. (1996/1997). But teacher you went right on: A perspective on Reading Recovery. The Reading Teacher, 50, 284-292.
4. Bloom, B. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13, 4-16.
5. Campbell, D.T., & Stanley, J.C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
6. Center, Y., Wheldall, K., & Freeman, L. (1992). Evaluating the effectiveness of Reading Recovery: A critique. Educational Psychology, 12, 263-274.
7. Center, Y., Wheldall, K., Freeman, L., Outhred, B., & McNaught, M. (1995). An evaluation of Reading Recovery. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 240-263.
8. Chapman, J.W., Tunmer, W.E., & Prochnow, J.E. (2001). Does success in the Reading Recovery program depend on developing proficiency in phonological processing skills? A longitudinal study in a whole language instructional context. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 141-176.
9. Church, J. (December 2005). Accelerating reading development in low achieving children: A review of research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the New Zealand Association for Research in Education, Christchurch, New Zealand.
10. Clay, M. (1993). Reading Recovery. Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann.
11. Gilmore, A. (1998). School entry assessment. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
12. Glynn, T., Crooks, T., Bethune, N., Ballard, K., & Smith, J. (1989). Reading Recovery in context. Wellington: Department of Education.
13. Hiebert, E., & Taylor, B.M. (2000). Beginning reading instruction: Research on early intervention. In L. Kamil & R. Barr (Eds.). Handbook of reading research (Vol 3) (pp. 455-482). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Iversen, S., Tunmer, W.E., & Chapman, J.W. (2005). The effects of varying group size on the Reading Recovery approach to preventive early intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 38, 456-472.
15. McDowall, S., Boyd, S., & Hodgen, E., with van Vliet, T. (2005). Reading Recovery in New Zealand: Uptake, implementation, and outcomes, especially in relation to Maori and Pasifika students. Wellington, New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
16. Ministry of Education. (12 December 2005). Report reinforces international recognition for Reading Recovery. Press release. URL: www.moe.govt.nz/index.cfm?layout=document&documentid=10935&indexid= 9332&indexparentid=5437
17. Nicholson, T. (2003). Risk factors in learning to read. In B. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 165-193). Timonium, MD: York Press.
18. Shanahan, T., & Barr, R. (1995). Reading Recovery: An independent evaluation of the effects of an early instructional intervention for at-risk learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 958-996.
19. Snow, C.E., Burns., M.S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
20. Tunmer, W.E. & Chapman, J.W. (2003). The Reading Recovery approach to preventative early intervention: As good as it gets? Reading Psychology, 24, 337-364.
21. Tunmer, W.E. & Chapman, J.W. (2004). Reading Recovery: Distinguishing myth from reality. In R.M. Joshi (Ed.), Dyslexia: Myths, misconceptions and some practical applications (pp. 99-114). Baltimore, MD: International Dyslexia Association.
22. Tunmer, W.E., Chapman, J.W., & Prochnow, J.E. (2003). Preventing negative Matthew effects in at-risk readers: A retrospective study. In B. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 121-163). Timonium, MD: York Press.
23. Whitehurst, G.J., & Lonigan, C.J. (2001). Emergent literacy: Development from pre-readers to readers. In S.B. Neuman & D.K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 11-29). New York: Guilford Press.