A meta-analysis of reading recovery in united states schools

Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 23-38

  D'Agostino, Jerome V ^a   Murphy, Judith A ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b Darien Public School District   (United States)

^c Darien Public School District #61   (United States)

Author keywords

Literacy education; Meta analysis; Student achievement; Students at risk

Indexed keywords

EID: 3242723226     PISSN: 01623737     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/01623737026001023     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Askew, B. J., Fountas, I. C., Lyons, C. A., Pinnell, G. S., & Schmitt, M. C. (1998). Reading Recovery review: Understandings outcomes & implications. Columbus, OH: Reading Recovery Council of North America.
2. Askew, B. J., & Frasier, D. F. (1994). Sustained effects of Reading Recovery intervention on the cognitive behaviors of second grade children and the perceptions of their teachers. Literacy, Teaching, and Learning: An International Journal of Early Literacy, 1(1), 87-107.
3. Bermel, S. (1987). Language development component, CLEAR - Reading Recovery program 1985-86. Final evaluation report. Columbus Public Schools, Ohio Department of Evaluation Services. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED281157).
4. Borman, G. D., & D'Agostino, J. V. (1996). Title I and student achievement: A meta-analysis of federal evaluation results. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18, 309-326.
5. California State University. (1994). Reading Recovery in California 1991-93. Annual Report. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED373317).
6. Campbell, F. A., & Ramey, C. T. (1994). Effects of early intervention on intellectual and academic achievement: A follow-up study of children from low income families. Child Development, 65, 684-698.
7. Clay, M. M. (1985). The early detection of reading difficulties. (3rd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
8. Clay, M. M. (1993a). An observation survey of early literacy achievement. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
9. Clay, M. M. (1993b). Reading Recovery: A guidebook for teachers in training. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Publishing.
10. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasiwexperimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
11. Curry, J., Giffith, J., & Williams, H. (1995). Reading Recovery in AISD. (Publication no. 94.06.) (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED393918).
12. Curtin, J. (1993). The effectiveness of the Reading Recovery program on reading achievement. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED363863).
13. D'Agostino, J. V. (2000). School effects on students' longitudinal reading and math achievements. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11, 197-235.
14. Denton, C. A. (1997, January). An evaluation of an implementation of the Reading Recovery program. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, Austin, TX. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED408309).
15. Des Moines Public Schools, Iowa Department of Information Management. (1994). Reading/writing and mathematics instruction. CIPP Planning/evaluation report 95-018. Focus on program evaluation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED382671).
16. Dunkeld, C. (1990). Gaining experience with Reading Recovery: A pilot project between Portland Public Schools and Portland State University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED321246).
17. Elbaum, B., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M. T., & Moody, S. W. (2000). How effective are one-to-one tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at risk for reading failure? A meta-analysis of the intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 605-619.
18. Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Gomez-Bellenge, F. X. (2003). Reading Recovery and Descubriendo La Lectura statistical abstract, 2001-2002. Columbus, OH: Reading Recovery National Data Evaluation Center.
20. Hiebert, E. H. (1994). Reading Recovery in the United States: What difference does it make to an age cohort? Educational Researcher, 23(9), 15-25.
21. Hiebert, E. H., Colt, J. M., Catto, S. L., & Gury, E. C. (1992). Reading and writing of first-grade students in a restructured Chapter 1 program. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 545-572.
22. Huck, C. S., & Pinnell, G. S. (1986). The Reading Recovery Project in Columbus, Ohio, Vol. 1 Pilot year 1984-85. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.
23. Iverson, S., & Tunmer, W. E. (1993). Phonological processing skills and the Reading Recovery Program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 112-126.
24. Jones, C., Lewandowski, D., & Wall, T. (1994). Prospects: The congressionally-mandated study of educational growth and opportunity. Introduction and guide to the 1992 data file user's manuals. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
25. Johnson, J. A. (1996). Reading Recovery: Early intervention. Fort Hays State University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED398564).
26. Leiby, B. D. (1993). The effects of a transitional year on first graders in the Reading Recovery program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University.
27. Leitner, D. (1990). Portland Reading Recovery program 1989-90 evaluation report. Year 1. Portland Public Schools, Oregon Research and Evaluation Department. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED326839).
28. Linn, R. L. (1980). Regression towards the mean and the interval between test administrations. New Directions for Testing and Measurement, 8, 59-82.
29. Lukas, B., & Schlesinger, J. (1995). Reading Recovery Project Year IV, 1994-1995. Site Report. University Park, IL: The Governors State University, Consortium Plainfield Site.
30. Lyons, C. A., Pinnell, G. S., Short, K., & Young, P. (1986). The Ohio Reading Recovery Project, Vol. 4, Pilot Year 1985-86. Columbus: The Ohio State University.
31. Pinnell, G. S. (1988). Success of children at risk in a program that combines writing and reading. (Technical Report No. 417) (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED292061).
32. Pinnell, G. S., DeFord, D. E., & Lyons, C. A. (1988). Reading Recovery: Early intervention for at-risk first graders. (ERS Monograph) (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED303790).
33. Pinnell, G. S., DeFord, D. E., Lyons, C. A., & Bryk, A. (1995). Response to Rasinski. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 272-275.
34. Pinnell, G. S., Huck, C. S., & DeFord, D. E. (1986). The Reading Recovery Project in Columbus, Ohio studies, Vol 3 (Year 1: 1985-86). Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.
35. Pinnell, G. S., Lyons, C. A., DeFord, D. E., Bryk, A. S., & Seltzer, M. (1994). Comparing instructional models for the literacy education of high-risk first graders. Reading Research Quarterly, 29, 9-39.
36. Pinnell, G. S., Lyons, C. A., Young, P., & DeFord, D. E. (1987). The Reading Recovery Project in Columbus, Ohio, Vol. 6, Year 2, 1986-87. Columbus: The Ohio State University.
37. Pollock, J. S. (1990). Language development component compensatory language experiences and reading, CLEAR - Reading Recovery program, 1989-90. Final evaluation report. Columbus Public Schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED327821).
38. Pollock, J. S. (1991). Reading Recovery program 1990-91. Final evaluation report. Elementary and secondary education. Columbus Public Schools, Ohio Department of Program Evaluation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED343108).
39. Pollock, J. S. (1993). Reading Recovery program 1991-92. Elementary and Secondary Education Act - Chapter 1. Columbus Public Schools, Ohio Department of Program Evaluation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED358440).
40. Pollock, J. S. (1995). Reading Recovery program 1994-95. Final evaluation report. Elementary and Secondary Education Act - Chapter 1. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED386699).
41. Pressley, M. Wharton-McDonald, R., & Hampston, J. M. (1998). The development of literacy, Part 3: Expert primary-level teaching of literacy is balanced teaching. In M. Pressley (Ed.), Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching, (pp. 155-191). New York: The Guildford Press.
42. Rasinski, T. (1995). Commentary on the effects of Reading Recovery: A response to Pinnell, Lyons, DeFord, Bryk, and Seltzer. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 264-270.
43. Ramaswami, S. (1994). The differential impact of Reading Recovery on the achievement of first graders in the Newark School District, 1991-1993. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED374180).
44. Reading Recovery Facts and Figures, (n.d.). Retrieved February 4, 2003, Retrieved from http://www.readingrecovery.org/sections/reading/facts.asp.
45. Rosenthal, R. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. In H. Cooper and L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 231-244). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
46. Saginaw Public Schools, Michigan Department of Evaluation Services. (1992). Reading Recovery program 1991-92. Compensatory education product evaluation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED350587).
47. Saginaw Public Schools. (1992). Compensatory education product evaluation; Elementary and secondary programs 1991-1992. Michigan Department of Evaluation Services. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED350370).
48. Salinas, A., Williams, I., & Kohler, L. (1993). Reading Recovery program evaluation. Report McAllen Independent School District, Texas. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED366938).
49. Schotanus, H., Chase, C., & Fontaine, A. (1991). Reading Recovery Pilot Project (Laws 1989:301): Report of results and effectiveness. Concord, NH: New Hampshire State Department of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED363859).
50. Schotanus, H., Chase, C., & Fontaine, A. (1992). Reading Recovery Program, implementation year 2 (school year 1991-1992): Report of results and effectiveness. Concord, NH: New Hampshire State Department of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED363860).
51. Schotanus, H., Chase, C., Fontaine, A., & Tilton, S. (1993). Reading Recovery program implementation year three, school year 1992-1993. Report of results and effectiveness. New Hampshire State Department of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED364869).
52. Schotanus, H., Fontaine, A., Tilton, S., Westergren, G., & Anderson, D. (1996). Reading Recovery implementation year six. School year 1995-96. Report of results and effectiveness. Concord, NH: New Hampshire State Department of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED405573).
53. Shadish, W. R., & Haddock, C. K. (1994). Combining estimates of effect size. In H. Cooper and L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 261-281). New York: Russell Sage Foundation
54. Shanahan, T., & Barr, R. (1995). Reading Recovery: An independent evaluation of the effects of an early instructional intervention for at-risk learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 958-996.
55. Smith, N. (1994). Reading Recovery data and observations from one Illinois site. (Part one). Illinois Reading Council Journal, 22(2), 7-27.
56. Smith, N. (1994). Reading Recovery data and observations from one Illinois site. (Part II). Illinois Reading Council Journal, 22(3), 29-45.
57. Smith-Burke, M. T., & Jaggar, A. M. (1994). Implementing Reading Recovery in New York: Insights from the first two years. In E. H. Hiebert and B. M. Taylor (Eds.), Getting reading right from the start. (pp. 63-84). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
58. Thomas, P. M. (1989). Language development component, Compensatory Language Experiences And Reading: CLEAR - Reading Recovery program 1987-88. Final evaluation report. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED313668).
59. Wang, Y. L., & Johnstone, W. (1997, March). Evaluation of Reading Recovery Program. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED406652).
60. Wasik, B. A., & Slavin, R. E. (1993). Preventing early reading failure with one-to-one tutoring: A review of five programs. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 179-200.