Responsibility and accountability without direct control?: Local education authorities and the seeking of influence in the UK schools sector

Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 762-788

  Agyemang, Gloria ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Control; Educational institutions; England; Influence; Management accountability

Indexed keywords

EID: 68349121607     PISSN: 09513574     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/09513570910966360     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Ahrens, T. and Chapman, C. (2006), Doing qualitative field research in management accounting: positioning data to contribute to theory, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 31 No. 8, pp. 819-41.
2. Alexander, E.R. (1998), A structuration theory of interorganisational coordination: cases in environmental management, International Journal of Organisational Analysis, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 334-54.
3. Atkinson, P. and Coffey, A. (1997), Analysing documentary realities, in Silverman, D. (Ed.), Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice, Sage Publications, London.
4. Bachmann, R. (2003), The coordination of relations across organisational boundaries, International Studies of Management and Organisations, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 7-21.
5. Baxter, H. (1987), System and lifeworld in Habermas's theory of communicative action, Theory and Society, Vol. 9 Nos 5/6, pp. 39-86.
6. Bovens, M. (1998), The Quest for Responsibility: Accountability and Citizenship in Complex Organisations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
7. Brewer, J.D. (2000), Ethnography, Open University Press, Buckingham.
8. Broadbent, J. and Laughlin, R. (1997), Developing empirical research: an example informed by a Habermasian approach, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 10 No. 5, pp. 622-48.
9. Broadbent, J. and Laughlin, R. (2003), Control and legitimation in government accountability processes: the private finance initiative in the UK, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 14 Nos 1/2, pp. 23-48.
10. Broadbent, J., Laughlin, R. and Read, S. (1991), Recent financial and administrative changes in the NHS: a critical theory analysis, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 2, pp. 1-29.
11. Department for Education and Employment (1999), Code of Practice LEA - School Relations, DFEE, London.
12. Dilley, P. (2004), Interviews and the philosophy of qualitative research, Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 75 No. 1, pp. 127-32.
13. Dubnick, R. (2005), Accountability and the promise of performance: in search of the mechanisms, Public Performance and Management, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 376-417.
14. Edwards, P., Ezzamel, M., McLean, C. and Robson, K. (1999), New Public Sector Reform and Institutional Change, Chartered Institute of Management Accountants, London.
15. Edwards, P., Ezzamel, M. and Robson, K. (2005), Budgetary reforms: survival strategies and the structuration of organisational fields in education, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 18 No. 6, pp. 733-55.
16. Edwards, P., Ezzamel, M., Robson, K. and Taylor, M. (1995), Budgeting and organizational change, Financial Accountability and Management, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 297-315.
17. Edwards, P., Ezzamel, M., Robson, K. and Taylor, M. (1996), Comprehensive and incremental budgeting in education: the construction and management of formula funding in three English local education authorities, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 4-37.
18. Edwards, P., Ezzamel, M., Robson, K. and Taylor, M. (1997), The Local Management of Schools Initiative: The Implementation of Formula Funding in Three English LEAs, CIMA, London.
19. Eisenhardt, K. (1989), Building theories from case study research, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 532-50.
20. Fielding, N. and Thomas, H. (2001), Qualitative interviewing, in Gilbert, N. (Ed.), Researching Social Life, Sage, London.
21. Greenwood, R. and Hinings, C.R. (1996), Understanding radical organisational change: bringing together the old and the new institutionalism, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 1022-54.
22. Habermas, J. (1984), The Theory of Communicative Action: Volume 1 Reason and the Rationalisation of Society, Heinemann, London.
23. Habermas, J. (1987), The Theory of Communicative Action: Volume 2 The critiques of Functionalist Reason, Heinemann, London.
24. Hofstede, G. (1981), Management control of public and not-for profit activities, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 193-211.
25. Holliday, A. (2002), Doing and Writing Qualitative Research, Sage Publications, London.
26. Hood, C. (1991), A public management for all seasons, Public Administration, Vol. 69, pp. 3-19.
27. Hood, C. (1995), The 'new public management' in the 1980s: variations on a theme, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 20, pp. 93-109.
28. House of Commons Education and Skills Select Committee (2006), The Schools White Paper: Higher Standards Better Schools for All. First Report of Session 2005-06, House of Commons, UK Parliament, London.
29. How, A. (2003), Critical Theory, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
30. Humphrey, C. (2001), Paper prophets and the continuing case for thinking differently about accounting research, British Accounting Review, Vol. 33, pp. 91-103.
31. Hutchcroft, P.D. (2001), Centralisation and decentralisation in administration and politics: assessing territorial dimensions of authority and power, Governance, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 23-53.
32. Jacobs, K. (1995), Budgets: a medium of organisational transformation, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 6, pp. 59-75.
33. Jacobs, K. (1998), Costing healthcare: a study of the introduction of cost and budget reports in a GP association, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 9, pp. 55-70.
34. Kickert, W. (1995), Steering at a distance: a new paradigm of public governance in Dutch higher education, Governance, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 135-57.
35. Kickert, W. (1997), Public governance in The Netherlands: an alternative to Anglo-American 'managerialism', Public Administration, Vol. 75 No. 4, pp. 731-52.
36. Klijn, E.H. and Koppenjan, J.F.M. (2000), Public management and policy network: foundations of a network approach to governance, Public Management, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 135-58.
37. Kooiman, J. (2003), Governing as Governance, Sage Publications, London.
38. Laughlin, R., Broadbent, J., Shearn, D. and Willig-Atherton, H. (1994), Absorbing LMS: the coping mechanisms of a small group, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 59-85.
39. Lawrence, S. (1999), From welfare state to the civil society: the constitutive use of accounting in the reform of the New Zealand public sector, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 10, pp. 223-46.
40. McNamee, S. and Gergen, K.J. (1999), Relational Responsibility: Resources for Sustainable Dialogue, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
41. Merchant, K. (1985), Control in Business Organisations, Pitman, London.
42. Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. (1994), Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
43. Newman, J. (2001), Modernising Governance: New Labour, Policy and Society, Sage, London.
44. O'Dwyer, B. (2004), Qualitative data analysis: illuminating a process for transforming a 'messy' but 'attractive' 'nuisance', in Humphrey, C. and Lee, B. (Eds), The Real Life Guide to Accounting Research: A Behind the Scenes View of Using Qualitative Research Methods, Elsevier, Oxford.
45. Olson, O., Humphrey, C. and Guthrie, J. (1998), Global Warning! Debating International Developments in New Public Financial Management, Cappelen, Akademisk Forlag, Oslo.
46. Olson, O., Humphrey, C. and Guthrie, J. (2001), Caught in an evaluatory trap: a dilemma for public services under NPFM, European Accounting Review, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 505-22.
47. Osborne, D. and Gaebler, T. (1992), Reinventing Government, Plume, New York, NY.
48. Otley, D. (1994), Management control in contemporary organisations: towards a wider framework, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 5, pp. 289-99.
49. Otley, D. (2005), Performance management, in Berry, A., Broadbent, J. and Otley, D. (Eds), Management Control: Theories, Issues and Performance, Palgrave, Macmillan, Basingstoke.
50. Otley, D. and Berry, A. (1994), Case study research in management accounting and control, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 5, pp. 45-65.
51. Ouchi, W.G. (2006), Power to the principals: decentralization in three large school districts, Organization Science, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 298-307.
52. Painter, C. and Clarence, E. (2000), New Labour and inter-governmental management: flexible networks or performance control, Public Management, Vol. 2, pp. 477-98.
53. Parker, L.D. (1986), Developing Control Concepts in the 20th Century, Garland, New York, NY.
54. Parker, L.D. (2002), It's been a pleasure doing business with you: a strategic analysis and critique of university change management, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 15 Nos 5/6, pp. 603-19.
55. Parker, L.D. and Gould, G. (1999), Changing public sector accountability: critiquing new directions, Accounting Forum, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 109-35.
56. Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. (1978), The External Control of Organisations: A Resource Dependence Perspective, Harper & Row, London.
57. Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. (2000), Public Management Reform, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
58. Ranson, S. (2003), Public accountability in the age of neo-liberal governance, Journal of Educational Policy, Vol. 18 No. 5, pp. 459-80.
59. Ritchie, J. (2003), The applications of qualitative methods to social research, in Ritchie, J. and Lewis, J. (Eds), Qualitative Research Practice, Sage, London.
60. Scapens, R.W. (1990), Researching management accounting practice: the role of case study methods, British Accounting Review, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 259-81.
61. Scapens, R.W. (2004), Doing case study research, in Humphrey, C. and Lee, B. (Eds), The Real Life Guide to Accounting Research: A Behind the Scenes View of Using Qualitative Research Methods, Elsevier, Oxford.
62. Sinclair, A. (1995), The chameleon of accountability: forms and discourses, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 20 Nos 2/3, pp. 219-37.
63. Singh, G. (2002), Educational consumers or educational partners: a critical theory analysis, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, No. 13, pp. 681-700.
64. Vidovich, L. (2002), Quality assurance in Australian higher education: globalization and 'steering at a distance', Higher Education, Vol. 43, pp. 391-408.
65. Van Langen, A. and Dekkers, H. (2001), Decentralisation and combating educational exclusion, Comparative Education, Vol. 37 No. 3, pp. 367-84.
66. Williams, P. (2002), The competent boundary spanner, Public Administration, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 103-24.
67. Audit Commission (1999), Held in Trust: The LEA of the Future, Audit Commission, London.
68. Barlow, J. and Rober, M. (1996), Steering not rowing: co-ordination and control in the management of public services in Britain and Germany, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 9 Nos 5/6, pp. 73-89.
69. Berry, A. and Broadbent, J. (1998), Power and control: opening up agendas, paper presented at the Management Control Association.
70. Berry, A. and Otley, D. (2004), Case based research in accounting, in Humphrey, C. and Lee, B. (Eds), Real Life Guides to Qualitative Research in Accounting, Elsevier, Oxford.
71. Day, P. and Klein, R. (1987), Accountabilities: Five Public Services, Tavistock Publications, London.
72. Department for Education and Skills (2001a), Schools Building on Success: Raising Standards, Promoting Diversity, Achieving Results, CM5050, DfES, London.
73. Department for Education and Skills (2001b), The Role of the Local Education Authority in School Education, HMSO, London.
74. Ezzamel, M., Robson, K., Stapleton, P. and McLean, C. (2007), Discourse and institutional change: 'giving accounts' and accountability, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 18, pp. 150-71.
75. Hannon, V. (1999), On the receiving end: New Labour and the LEAs, Cambridge Journal of Education, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 207-17.
76. Johnston, J. (1992), Quality assurance, school self-management and the contradictions of control, European Journal of Education, Vol. 27 Nos 1/2, pp. 165-75.
77. Kickert, W. and Koppenjan, J.F.M. (1997), Public management and network management, in Kickert, W., Klijn, E.H. and Koppenjan, J.F.M. (Eds), Managing Complex Networks, Sage, London.
78. Kirkpatrick, I. (1999), The worst of both worlds: public services without markets or bureaucracy, Public Money and Management, October- December, pp. 7-14.
79. Kogan, M. (2002), The subordination of local government and the compliant society, Oxford Review of Education, Vol. 28 Nos 2/3, pp. 331-42.
80. Laughlin, R. and Broadbent, J. (1993), Accounting and the law: partners in the juridification of the public sector in the UK?, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 4, pp. 337-68.
81. Lowe, R. (2002), A century of local education authorities: what has been lost?, Oxford Review of Education, Vol. 28 Nos 2/3, pp. 149-60.
82. Newman, J., Raine, J. and Skelcher, C. (2001), Transforming local government: innovation and modernisation, Public Money and Management, Vol. 2, pp. 61-8.
83. OFSTED (1999), [Langham] Inspection Report, OFSTED.
84. OFSTED (2000), [Borrowdale] Inspection Report, OFSTED.
85. OFSTED (2003), [Langham] Inspection Report, OFSTED.
86. Wright, G. and Taylor, A. (2001), Informing effective performance management, Journal of Finance and Management in Public Services, Vol. 1 No. 1.