Cytochrome oxidase 1 gene sequence analysis in six flatfish species (Teleostei, Pleuronectidae) of Far East Russia with inferences in phylogeny and taxonomy

Mitochondrial DNA

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 479-489

  Kartavtsev, Yuri Ph ^a,b   Sharina, Svetlana N ^a   Goto, Tadasuke ^c   Chichvarkhin, Anton Y ^a   Balanov, Andrey A ^a   Vinnikov, Kirill A ^b   Ivankov, Vyacheslav N ^b   Hanzawa, Naoto ^c  

^a INSTITUTE OF MARINE BIOLOGY   (Russian Federation)

^b FAR EASTERN FEDERAL UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^c YAMAGATA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cytochrome oxidase 1; Flatfish; Molecular phylogeny; P distance; Sequence; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE; CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE 1; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; NUCLEOTIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BAYESIAN LEARNING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA BARCODING; EVOLUTION; FAMILIA; FLATFISH; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENUS; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; MONOPHYLY; NEIGHBOR JOINING METHOD; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PERCIFORMES; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PHYLOGENY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RUSSIAN FEDERATION; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SPECIES; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; SPECIES IDENTIFICATION; TAXONOMY; TELEOST;

ANIMALS; BASE COMPOSITION; BASE SEQUENCE; BAYES THEOREM; DNA PRIMERS; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; ELECTRON TRANSPORT COMPLEX IV; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FISH PROTEINS; FLATFISHES; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, GENETIC; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; RUSSIA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

ACTINOPTERYGII; PERCIFORMES; PISCES; PLEURONECTIDAE; PLEURONECTIFORMES; TELEOSTEI;

EID: 68349120273     PISSN: 19401736     EISSN: 19401744     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19401730802570934     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Asahida T, Saitoh K, Yamashita Y, Aonuma Y, Kobayashi T. 1998. Genetic variation in the Japanese flounder based on analysis of mitochondrial DNA by restriction endonucleases. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 64:377-383.
2. Avise JC. 2001. Phylogeography. The history and formation of species. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. Avise JC, Aquadro CF. 1982. A comparative summary of genetic distances in the vertebrates: Pattern and correlations. Evol Biol 15:151-185.
4. Ayala FJ, Tracey ML, Hedgecock D, Richmond RC. 1974. Genetic differentiation during the speciation process in Drosophila. Evolution 28:576-592.
5. Berendzen PB, Dimmick WW. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships of Pleuronectiformes based on molecular evidence. Copeia 3: 642-652.
6. Bush GL. 1975. Modes of animal speciation. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 6:339-364.
7. Cooper JA, Chapleau F. 1998. Monophyly and intrarelationships of the family Pleuronectidae (Pleuronectiformes), with a revised classification. Fish Bull 96:686-726.
8. Dobzhansky Th. 1955. Evolution, genetics and man. New York/London: John Wiley Sons/Chapman Hall. p 398.
9. Felsenstein J. 2004. Inferring phylogenies. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates Inc. p 664.
10. FishBase. Froesy R, Pauly D, editors 2007. Internet. Electronic citation. www.fishbase.org.
11. Hall B. 2001. Phylogenetic trees made easy. A how-to manual fo molecular biologists. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates Inc.
12. Harrison RG. 1998. Linking evolutionary pattern and process: The relevance of species concepts for the study of speciation.In: Howard DJ, Berlocher SH, editors. Endless forms: Species and speciation. Oxford New York: Oxford University Press. p 19-31.
13. Hebert PD, Stoeckle MY, Zemlak TS, Francis CM. 2004. Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. PLoS Biol 2:e312.
14. Herzenstein SM. 1890. Ichthyologische Bemerkungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften. II. Mélanges Biologiques, tirés du Bulletin physico-mathématique de l'Academie Impériale des Sciences de St. Pétersbourg v. 13:127-141.
15. Hillis DM. 1998. Taxonomic sampling, phylogenetic accuracy, and investigator bias. Syst Biol 47:3-8.
16. Hillis DM, Moritz C, Mable B, editors. 1996. Molecular systematics. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates Inc. p 407 -514.
17. Hulsenbeck JP, RondquistF. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17:754-755.
18. Ivankova ZG. 1995. Dynamics of the flounder populations in the northwest Japan Sea. In International Symposium on North Pacific Flatfish, Anchorage, Alaska, USA. Alaska University Publ., Anchorage. p 443-449.
19. Johns GC, Avise JC. 1998. A comparative summary of genetic distances in the vertebrates from the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Mol Biol Evol 15:1481-1490.
20. Jordan DS, Snyder JO. 1901. List of fishes collected in 1883 and 1885 by Pierre Louis Jouy and preserved in the United States National Museum, with descriptions of six new species. Proceedings of the United States National Museum v. 23 (no. 1235): 739-769, Pls. 31-38.
21. Johnson GD, Paterson C. 1993. Percomorph phylogeny: A survey of acanthomorphs and new proposal. Bull Mar Sci 52:554-626.
22. Kartavtsev YP. 2005. Molecular evolution and population genetics. Vladivostok: Far Eastern State University Press. p 234.
23. Kartavtsev YP, Lee J-S. 2006. Analysis of nucleotide diversity at genes Cyt-b and Co-1 on population, species, and genera levels. Applicability of DNA and allozyme data in the genetics of speciation. Genetika 42:437-461.
24. Kartavtsev YP, Sviridov VV, Sasaki T, Hanzawa N. 2002. Genetic divergence of far eastern dace belonging to the genus Tribolodon (Pisces, Cyprinidae) and closely related taxa: Some insights in taxonomy and speciation. Genetica 38:1518-1531 (in Russian, translated into English).
25. Kartavtsev YP, Park T-J, Vinnikov KA, Ivankov VN, Sharina SN, Lee J-S. 2007a. Cytochrome b (Cyt-b) gene sequences analysis in six flatfish species (Pisces, Pleuronectidae) with phylogenetic and taxonomic insights. J Mar Biol 152(4):757-773.
26. Kartavtsev YP, Lee Y-M, Jung S-O, Byeon H-K, Son Y-, Lee J-S. 2007b. Complete mitochondrial genome in the bullhead torrent catfish, Liobagrus obesus (Siluriformes, Amblycipididae) and phylogenetic considerations. Gene 396:13-27.
27. Kim I-C, Kweon H-S, Kim YJ, Kim C-B, Gye MC, Lee W-O, Lee Y-S, Lee J-S. 2004. The complete mitochondrial genome of the javeline goby Acanthogobius hasta (Perciformes, Gobiidae) and phylogenetic considerations. Gene 336:147-153.
28. Kim I-C, Jung S-O, Lee Y-M, Lee CJ, Park J-K, Lee J-S. 2005. The complete mitochondrial genome of the ray fish Raja porosa (Chondrichthyes, Rajidae). DNA Seq 16:187-194.
29. King M. 1993. Species evolution: The role ofchromosome change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p 336.
30. Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M. 1993. MEGA: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (with a 130-page printed manual). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University. MEGA3. Web-base β-version, 2005 update.
31. Lee J-S. 2000. The internally self-fertilized hermaphroditic teleost Rivulus marmoratus (Cyprinodontiformes, Rivulidae) β-actin gene: Amplification and sequence analysis with conserved primers. Mar Biotechnol 2:161 -166.
32. Lindberg GU, Fedorov VV. 1993. Fishes of Japan Sea and nearby parts of Okhotsk and Yellow seas. Part 6. Teleostomi.Osteichthyes. Actinopterigii. XXXI. Pleuronectiformes. Sankt-Petersburg: Sankt-Petersburg University Press. p 272 c.
33. Masuda H, Amaoka K, Araga C, Uyeno T, Yoshino T. 1984. The fishes ofthe Japanese Archipelago. Tokyo: Tokai University Press. p 437.
34. Mayr E. 1982. Process of speciation in animals. In: Barigozzi C, editor. Mechanisms of speciation. New York: Alan R. Liss. p 10-20.
35. Miya M, Kawaguchi A, Nishida M. 2001. Mitogenomic exploration ofhigher teleostean phylogenies: A case study for moderate-scale evolutionary genomics with 38 newly determined complete mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol Biol Evol 18:1993 -2009.
36. Miya M, Takeshima H, Endo H, Ishiguro NB, Inoue JG, Mukai T, et al. 2003. Major patterns of higher teleostean phylogenies: A new perspective based on 100 complete mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 1:121 -138.
37. Moiseev PA. 1953. Cod and flatfishes of the Far East. Izvestia TINRO 40:119-287.
38. Nailor GJ, Collins TM, Brown WM. 1996. Hydrophobicity and phylogeny. Nature 373:565 -566. Nakabo T. 2002. Fishes of Japan with pictorial keys to the species. English ed. Tokyo: Tokai University Press. p lxi + vii + 1749.
39. Nei M. 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. New York: Columbia University Press. p 512.
40. Nei M, Kumar S. 2000. Molecular evolution and phylogenetics. New York: Oxford University Press. p 333.
41. Nelson JS. 1994. Fishes of the world. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons. p 600.
42. Nohara M, Nishida M, Miya M, Nishikawa T. 2005. Evolution of the mitochondrial genome in cephalochordata as inferred from complete nucleotide sequences from two epigonichthys species. J Mol Evol 60:526-537.
43. Norman IR. 1934. A systematic monograph of the flatfishes (Heterosomata) Volume I: Psettodidae, Bothidae, Pleuronecti- dae. London: British Museum. p 459.
44. Orr JW, Matarese AC. 2000. Revision of the genus Lepidopsetta Gill, 1862 (Teleostei: Pleuronectidae) based on larval and adult morphology, with a description of a new species from the North Pacific Ocean and Bering Sea. Fish Bull 98:539-582.
45. Page RDM. 1996. TREEVIEW: An application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comput Appl Biosci 12:357-358.
46. Pardo BG, Machordom A, Foresti F, Porto-Foresti F, Azevedo MFC, Banon R, et al. 2005. Phylogenetic analysis of flatfish (Order Pleuronectiformes) based on mitochondrial 16s rDNA sequences. Sci Mar 69:531 -543.
47. Posada D, Grandal KA. 1998. MODELTEST: Testing the model DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-818.
48. Reagan CT. 1910. The origin and the evolution of the Teleostean fishes of the order Heterosomata. Ann Mag Nat Hist 8:6.
49. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572-1574.
50. Saitoh K, Hayashizaki K, Yokoyama Y, Asahida T, Toyohara H, Yamashita Y. 2000. Complete nucleotide sequence of Japanese flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) mitochondrial genome: Structural properties and cues for resolving teleostean relationships. JHered 91:271-278.
51. Schmidt PJ. 1904. Fishes ofthe eastern seas ofthe Russian Empire. St. Petersburg: i-xi + 466 p, Pls. 1-6. (In Russian.)
52. Simpson GG. 1961. Principles ofanimal taxonomy. The species and lower categories. New York: Columbia University Press.
53. StatSoft, Inc. 1999. STATISTICA for Windows. Computer program manual. Tulsa, OK: StatSoft, Inc. http://www.statsoft.com.
54. Steindachner F. 1879. Ichthyologische Beitrage (VIII). Sitzungsber-ichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Mathe-matisch-Naturwissenschaften Classe v. 80 (nos. 1-2): 119-91, Pls. 1-3
55. Steindachner F, Kner R. 1870. Uber einige Pleuronectiden, Salmoniden, Gadoiden und Blenniiden aus der Decastris-Bay und von Viti-Levu. Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaften Classe v. 61 (1. abth.): 421-446.
56. Suzuki T, Srivastava AS, Kurokawa T. 2002. cDNA cloning and phylogenetic analysis of pancreatic serine proteases from Japanese flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus. Comp Biochem Physiol B-Biochem Mol Biol 131:63-70.
57. SwoffordDL. 2002. PAUP*: Pphylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 4.10. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates Inc. Templeton AR. 1981. Mechanisms of speciation-population genetic approach. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 12:23-48.
58. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. 1994. Clustal W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position, specific gap penalties, and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673-4680.
59. Vinnikov KA, Ivankov VN, Pitruk DL. 2006. Taxonomic status of Pseudopleuronectes yokohamae and P. schrenki (Pleuronectidae sensu Cooper and Chapleau, 1998). J Ichthyol 46:301-310.
60. Ward RD, Zemlak TS, Innes BH, Last PA, Hebert PDN. 2005. DNA barcoding Australia fish species. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 360:1847-1857.
61. Wilcox TP, Garcia de Leon FJ, Hendrickson DA, Hillis DM. 2004. Convergence among cave catfishes: Long-branch attraction and a Bayesian relative rates test. Mol Phylogenet Evol 31: 1101-1113.