Virtual analysis of stresses in human teeth restored with esthetic posts

Materials Research

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 459-463

  Amarante, Martha Vasconcellos ^a   Pereira, Marcos Venicius Soares ^b   Darwish, Fathi Aref Ibrahim ^c   Camarão, Arnold Freitas ^d  

^a SALGADO DE OLIVEIRA UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

^b PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^c FLUMINENSE FEDERAL UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

^d ARVINMERITOR INC   (United States)

Author keywords

Ceramic post; Fiber glass post; Shear stresses; Von Mises equivalent stresses

Indexed keywords

CERAMIC MATERIALS; GLASS; GLASS FIBERS; RESTORATION; SHEAR STRESS; STRESS CONCENTRATION; VIRTUAL REALITY;

A-CERAMICS; CERAMIC POSTS; ELASTIC STRESS DISTRIBUTION; FIBER GLASS; HUMAN TEETHS; RISK OF FAILURE; ROOT DENTIN; VON MISES EQUIVALENT STRESS;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

EID: 68349099917     PISSN: 15161439     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1516-14392008000400014     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ko CC, Chu CS, Chung KH, Lee MC. Effect of posts on dentin stress distribution in pulpless teeth. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1992; 68(3):421-427.
2. Reinhardt RA, Krejci RF, Pao YC, Srannard JG. Dentine stresses in post-reconstructed teeth with diminished bone support. Journal of Dental Research. 1983; 62(9):1002-1008.
3. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Sahafi A. Finite element analysis of stresses in endodontically treated, dowel-restored tooth. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2005; 94(4):321-329.
4. Pierrisnard L, Bohin F, Renault P, Barquins M. Corono-radicular reconstruction of pulpless tooth: A mechanical study using finite element analysis. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2002; 88(4):442-428.
5. Ho MH, Lee SY, Chen HH, Lee MC. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effects of posts on stress distribution in dentin. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1994; 72(4):367-372.
6. Morgano SM. Restoration of pulpless teeth: application of traditional principles in present and future contexts. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1996; 75(4):375-380.
7. Holmes DC, Diaz-Arnold AM, Leary JM. Influence of post dimension on stress distribution in dentin. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1996; 75(2):140-147.
8. Yaman SD, Karacaer O, Sahin M. Stress distribution of post-core applications in maxillary central incisors. Journal of Biomaterials Applications. 2004; 18:163-177.
9. Holmgren EP, Mante FK, Shokoufeh E, Afsharzand Z. Stress in post and core build-up materials. Journal of Dental Research. 1999; 78(2):222-228.
10. Akkayan B, Dent M, Gulmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2002; 87(4):431-437.
11. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. Journal of Dentistry. 1999; 27(4):275-278.
12. Catovic A, Seifert D, Guberina RP, Kvasnicka B. Influence of biomechanical factors on restoration of desvitalized teeth. Acta Stomatologica Croatica. 2000; 34(1):67-72.
13. Sadegui M. A comparison of the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth using three different post systems. Journal of Dentistry 2006; 3(2):69-76.
14. Fernandes AS, Shetty S, Coutinho I. Factors determining post selection: A literature review. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2003; 90(6):556-562.
15. Ricketts DNJ, Tait CME, Higgins AJ. Post and core systems, refinements to tooth preparation and cementation. British Dental Journal. 2005; 198(9):533-541.
16. Assif D, Bitenski A, Pilo R, Oren E. Effect of post design on resistence to fracture of endodontically treated teeth with complete crowns. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1993; 69(1):36-40.
17. Lambjerg-Hansen H, Asmussen E. Mechanical properties of endodontic posts. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 1997; 24(12): 882-887.
18. Yang HS, Lang LA, Molina A, Felton DA. The effect of dowel design and load direction on dowel-and-core restorations. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2001; 85(6):558-567.
19. Fernandes AS, Dessai GS. Factors affecting the fracture resistence of post-core reconstructed teeth: a review. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2001; 14(4):355-363.
20. Pidaparti RM, Beatty MW. Fracture toughness determination of dental materials by laboratory testing and finite elements models. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 1995; 29(3):309-314.
21. Cardoso RJA, Gonçalves EAN. Odontologia estética. 1th ed. São Paulo: Artes Médicas Ltda.; 2002.
22. Meyenberg KH, Luthy H, Scharer P. Zirconium post. A new all-ceramic concept for nonvital abutment teeth. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 1995; 7(2):73-80.
23. Vree JHP, Peters MCRB, Plasschaert AJM. A comparison of photoelastic and finite element analysis in restored tooth structures. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 1983; 10(6):505-517.
24. Zienkiewicz OC. The Finite Element Method in engineering science. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1989.
25. Cook RD, Malkus DS, Plesha ME, Witt RJ. Concepts and applications of finite elements analysis. 4th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2002.
26. Wheeler RC. An Atlas of Tooth Form. 3th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 1984.
27. Seymore KG. Stresses within porcelain veneers and the composite lute using diferent preparation designs. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2001; 10(1):16-21.
28. Hochman N, Zalkind M. New all-ceramic indirect post-and-core system. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1999; 81(5):625-629.
29. Fischer H, Rentzsch W, Marx R. Elimination of low-quality ceramic posts by proof testing. Dental Materials. 2002; 18(8):570-575.
30. Newman MP, Yaman P, Dennison J. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2003; 89(4):360-367.