Student thinking about static equilibrium: Insights from written explanations to a concept question

Journal of Engineering Education

Volumn 97, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 481-490

  Newcomer, Jeffrey L ^a   Steif, Paul S ^b  

^a WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Static equilibrium; Student thinking

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION;

ASSESSMENT; ASSESSMENT TASKS; CONCEPT QUESTIONS; MOMENT EQUILIBRIA; MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS; STATIC EQUILIBRIUM;

STUDENTS;

EID: 68349083401     PISSN: 10694730     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00994.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Black, P., and D. William. 1998. Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education 5(1):7-73.
2. Bowden, J. J., G. Dall'Alba, E. Martin, D. Laurillard, F. Marton, G. Masters, P. Ramsden, A. Stephanou, and E. Walsh. 1992. Displacement, velocity and frames of reference: phenomenographic studies of students' understanding and some implications for teaching and assessment. American Journal of Physics 60(3):262-69.
3. Carey, S. 1999. Sources of conceptual change. In Conceptual development: Piaget's legacy, ed. E. Scholnick, K. Nelson, S. Gelman, and P. Miller, 293-236. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Chest X-Ray. October 2000. Agreement observer. http://www.chestx-ray.com/ Statistics/kappa.html.
5. Deacon, J. 2007. Chi-squared test for categories of data. The Really Easy Statistics Site. http://helios.bto.ed.ac.uk/bto/statistics/tressl. html#THE%20REALLY%20EASY%20STATISTICS%20SITE.
6. diSessa, A. 1993. Towards an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction 10 (2 & 3): 105-225.
7. Elby, A. 2000. What students' learning of representations tells us about constructivism. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 19(4):481-502.
8. Ericcson, K. A., and H. A. Simon. 1993. Protocol analysis, (Rev.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Evans, D. L., D. Gray, S. Krause, J. Martin, C. Midkiff, B. M. Notaros, M. Pavelich, D. Rancour, T. Reed-Rhoads, P. Steif, R. Streveler, and K. Wage. 2003. Progress on concept inventory assessment tools. In Proceedings of the 33rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Boulder, Co.
10. Gopnik, A., and H. M. Wellman. 1994. The theory theory. Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture, ed. L. A. Hirschfeld and S. A. Gelman. New York: Cambridge University Press, 257-93.
11. Halloun, I. A., and D. Hestenes. 1985. The initial knowledge state of college physics students. American Journal of Physics 53:1043-55.
12. Hammer, D. 1996a. Misconceptions or p-prims: how may alternative perspectives of cognitive structure influence instructional perceptions and intentions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 5(2):97-127.
13. Hammer, D. 1996b. More than misconceptions: multiple perspectives on student knowledge and reasoning, and an appropriate role for education research. American Journal of Physics 64(10):1316-25.
14. Heron, P. R. L. 2004a. Empirical investigations of learning and teaching, part i: Examining and interpreting student thinking. In Proceedings of the International School of Physics "Enrico Fermi" Course CLVI, Varenna, Italy, ed. E. F. Redish and M. Vicentini, 341-350. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
15. Heron, P. R. L. 2004b. Empirical investigations of learning and teaching, part ii: Developing research-based instructional materials. In Proceedings of the International School of Physics "Enrico Fermi" Course CLVI, Varenna, Italy, ed. E. F. Redish and M. Vicentini, 351-365. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
16. Hestenes, D., M. Wells, and G. Swackhamer. 1992. Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher 30(3):141-51.
17. Kundel, H. L., and M. Polansky. 2003. Measurement of observer agreement. Radiology 228(2):303-08.
18. Loverude, M. E., C. H. Kautz, and P. R. L. Heron. 2002. Student understanding of the first law of thermodynamics: relating work to the adiabatic compression of an ideal gas. American Journal of Physics 70(2):137-48.
19. McCloskey, M. 1983. Naive theories of motion. Mental Models, ed. D. Gentner, and Stevens, 299-324. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. McDermott, L. C. 1984. Research on conceptual understanding in mechanics. Physics Today 37(7):24-32.
21. Minstrell, J. 1992. Facets of students' knowledge and relevant instruction. In Proceedings of an International Workshop-Research in Physics Learning: Theoretical Issues and Empirical Studies, ed. R. Duit, F. Goldberg, and H. Niedderer, 110-128. Kiel, Germany. The Institute for Science Education (IPN).
22. National Research Council. 2001. Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment, ed. J. W. Pellegrino, N. Chudowsky, and R. Glaser. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
23. Newcomer, J. L. 2006. Many problems, one solution method: Teaching statics without 'special cases'. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual ASEE/IEE Frontiers in Education Conference, S2D-7-12. San Diego, CA.
24. Newcomer, J. L., and P. S. Steif. 2006. Student explanation of answers as a window into prior misconceptions. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual ASEE/IEE Frontiers in Education Conference, S4H-6-11. San Diego, CA.
25. Ortiz, L. G., P. R. L. Heron, and P. S. Shaffer. 2005. Student understanding of static equilibrium: predicting and accounting for balancing. American Journal of Physics 73(6):545-53.
26. Patterson, E., and G. Novak. 1999-2006. Just-In-Time Teaching, http://webphysics.iupui.edu/jitt/3itt.html.
27. Redish, E. F. 2004. A theoretical framework for physics education research: modeling student thinking. In Proceedings of the International School of Physics "Enrico Fermi" Course CLVI. Varenna, Italy, ed. E. F. Redish and M. Vicentini, 1-50. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
28. Rimoldini, L. G., and C. Singh. 2005. Student understanding of rotational and rolling motion concepts. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research 1.010102:010102-1-9.
29. Scott, M., T. Stelzer, and G. Gladding. 2006. Evaluating multiplechoice exams in a large introductory physics course. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research 2.020102:020102-1-14.
30. Shavelson, R. J., M. Li, M. A. Ruiz-Primo, and C. C. Ayala. 2002. Evaluating new approaches to assessing learning. Invited paper keynote speech at Joint Northumbria/EARLIAssessment Conference, University of Northumbria at Newcasde.
31. Steif, P. S., and J. A. Dantzler. 2005. A statics concept inventory: development and psychometric analysis. Journal of Engineering Education 94(4):363-71.
32. Steif, P. S., and M. A. Hansen. 2006. Comparisons between performances in a statics concept inventory and course examinations. International Journal of Engineering Education 22:1070-76.
33. Steif, P. S. and M. A. Hansen. 2007. New practices for administering and analyzing the results of concept inventories. Journal of Engineering Education 96(3):205-12.
34. Streveler, R. A., M. R. Geist, R. F. Ammerman, C. S. Sulzbach, R. L. Miller, B. M. Olds, and M. A. Nelson. 2006. The development of a professional knowledge base: The persistence of substance-based schemas in engineering students. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco, CA.
35. Vosniadou, S. 2002. On the nature of naïve physics. In Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice, ed. M. Limón and L. Mason, 61-76. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.