InnoTube: A video-based connection tool supporting collaborative innovation

Interactive Learning Environments

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 205-220

  Angehrn, Albert A ^a   Luccini, Angelo Marco ^a   Maxwell, Katrina ^a  

^a INSEAD   (France)

Author keywords

Connection dynamics; Connection games; Folksonomies; Innovation; Intelligent social agents; Knowledge management; Learning networks; Network visualization; New product development; Open innovation; Profiling; SLATES; Tags; User generated content; Virtual communities; Web2.0

Indexed keywords

EID: 68249128936     PISSN: 10494820     EISSN: 17445191     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10494820902924862     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Angehrn, A.A., & Maxwell, K. (2008). TENTube: A video-based connection tool supporting competence development [Special issue]. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 3, 29-37.
2. Angehrn, A.A., Maxwell, K., & Sereno, B. (2008). Enhancing social interaction in competence development networks: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Learning Technology, 3(4), 424-442.
3. Bender-de-Moll, S., & McFarland, D. (2006). The art and science of dynamic network visualization. Journal of Social Structure, 7 2). Retrieved May 22, 2009, from http://www.cmu.edu/joss/content/articles/volume7/deMollMcFarland/
4. Bughin, J., Chui, M., & Johnson, B. (2008). The next step in open innovation. The McKinsey Quarterly, 4, 112-122.
5. Chatti, M.A., Jarke, M., & Frosch-Wilke, D. (2007). The future of e-learning: A shift to knowledge networking and social software. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 3(4-5), 404-420.
6. Chesbrough, H.W. (2003). The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 35-41.
7. Damanpour, F., & Evan, W.V. (1984). Organizational innovation and performance: The problem of "organizational lag". Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(3), 392-409.
8. Damanpour, F., Szabat, K.A., & Evan, W.V. (1989). The relationship between types of innovation and organizational performance. Journal of Management Studies, 26(6), 587-602.
9. Davenport (2005). Thinking for a living. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
10. Dyer, J.H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and source of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679.
11. Fallows, D. (2005). Search engine users. Pew Internet and American Life Project, January 2005, 1-29.
12. Fliaster, A. (2000). Towards people-focused knowledge fusion paradigm of organizational innovation management. In J. wards & J. Kidd (Eds.), Proceedings of the KMAC 2000 Conference "Knowledge Management Beyond the Hype: Looking Towards the New Millennium." Paper presented at the Operational Research Society, Aston Business School, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
13. Fliaster, A. (2004). Cross-hierarchical interconnectivity: Forms, mechanisms and transformation of leadership culture. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 2, 48-57.
14. Fliaster, A., & Spiess, J. (2008). Knowledge mobilization through social ties: The cost-benefit analysis. Schmalenbach Business Review, 60, 99-117.
15. Freeman, L.C. (2000). Visualizing social networks. Journal of Social Structure, 1(1). Retrieved May 22, 2009, from http://www.cmu.edu/joss/content/articles/volume1/Freeman.html
16. Gee, P.J. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Computers in Entertainment, 1(1), 20-20.
17. Hrastinski, S. (2007). Using chat as a complement to discussion board in small-group online seminars: How is student participation affected? International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 3(4-5), 483-500.
18. Kleinbaum, A.M., & Tushman, M.L. (2008). Managing corporate social networks. Harvard Business Review, 86, 7-8.
19. Kosonen, M., Henttonen, K., & Ellonen, H.K. (2007). Weblogs and internal communication in a corporate environment: A case from the ICT industry. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 3(4-5), 437-449.
20. Loof, H., & Heshmati, A. (2006). On the relationship between innovation and performance: A sensitivity analysis. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15(4-5), 317-344.
21. Lytras, M.D., & Garcia, R. (2008). Semantic web applications: A framework for industry and business exploitation - What is needed for the adoption of the semantic web from the market and industry. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 4(1), 93-108.
22. Lytras, M., & Ordóñez de Pablos, P. (2007). Red gate corner: A web 2.0 prototype for knowledge and learning concerning China business and culture. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 3 4 and 5), 542-548.
23. Lytras, M., Rafaeli, S., Downes, S., Naeve, A., & Ordóñez de Pablos, P. (2007). Learning and interacting in the web: Social networks and social software in the web 2.0 Guest Editorial. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 3(4 and 5), 367-371.
24. Malone, T.W., & Lepper, M.R. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In R.E. Snow & M.J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction, Conative and affective process analyses (pp. 223-253). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. Manyika, J.M., Roberts, R.P., & Sprague, K.L. (2007). Eight business technology trends to watch. The McKinsey Quarterly, 1, 60-71.
26. McAfee, A.P. (2006). Enterprise 2.0: The dawn of emergent collaboration. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(3), 21-28.
27. Morris, M. (2005). How do users feel about technology? Forrester Research, 8 April 2005, 1-19.
28. Nielsen Interactive Entertainment (2005). Video gamers in Europe - 2005. Research report for Interactive Software Federation of Europe (ISFE). Retrieved May 22, 2009, from www.isfe-eu.org/
29. Ordóñez de Pablos, P. (2004). The importance of relational capital in service industry: The case of the spanish banking sector. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 1 4), 431-459.
30. Ordóñez de Pablos, P. (2005). Intellectual capital accounts: What pioneering firms from Asia and Europe are doing now. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 1(3), 249-268.
31. O'Reilly, T. (2005). What is web 2.0. design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved on 30th July 2008, from http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/ what-is-web-20.html, published on http://www.oreillynet.com on 30th September 2005.
32. Pirolo, L., & Presutti, M. (2007). Towards a dynamic knowledge-based approach to the innovation process: An empirical investigation on social capital inside an industrial cluster. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 4(1/2), 147-173.
33. Sawhney, M., & Prandelli, E. (2000). Communities of creation: Managing distributed innovation in turbulent markets. California Management Review, 42(4), 24-54.
34. Sherry, J., & Lucas, K. (2003). Video game uses and gratifications as predictors of use and game preference. Paper presented at the Mass Communication Division, International Communication Association Annual Convention, San Diego, CA.
35. Sigala, M. (2007). Integrating web 2.0 in e-learning environments: A socio-technical approach. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 3(6), 628-648.
36. Tung, L.L., Tan, P.L.J., Chia, P.J.T., & Koh, Y.L. (2001). An empirical investigation of virtual communities and trust. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 307-320). New Orleans: ICIS.
37. van der Spek, R., & Carter, G. (2003). A survey on good practices in knowledge management in european companies. In K. Mertins, P. Heisig, & J. Vorbeck (Eds.), Knowledge Management. Concepts and Best Practices (2nd ed.). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
38. von Ahn, L. (2005). Human computation. Ph.D. Thesis, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, CMU-CS-05-193, Pittsburgh, PA, 7 December 2005.
39. von Ahn, L., & Dabbish, L. (2004). Labeling images with a computer game. Paper presented at ACM CHI-2004, 24-29 April, Vienna, Austria.
40. Wideman, H.H., Owston, R.D., Brown, C., Kushniruk, A., Ho, F., & Pitts, K.C. (2007). Unpacking the potential of educational gaming: A new tool for gaming research. Simulation and Gaming, 38(1), 10-30.
41. Yee, N. (2006). The demographics, motivations, and derived experiences of users of massively multi-user online graphical environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 15, 309-329.