About Face: Mapping Our Institutional Presence

Computers and Composition

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 190-202

  Knight, Aimée ^a   Rife, Martine Courant ^a   Alexander, Phill ^a   Loncharich, Les ^a   DeVoss, Dànielle Nicole ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aesthetics; Cultural analysis; Disciplinary stance; Institutional critique; Interfaces; Macro level structures; Micro level interventions; Program web sites

Indexed keywords

EID: 68249115812     PISSN: 87554615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compcom.2009.05.003     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Barrios Barclay. Reimagining writing program web sites as pedagogical tools. Computers and Composition 21 1 (2004) 73-87
2. Bousquet Marc. Composition as management science: Toward a university without a WPA. Journal of Advanced Composition 22 4 (2002) 493-526
3. Carliner Saul. Physical, cognitive, and affective: A three-part framework for information design. In: Michael Albers, and Beth Mazur (Eds). Content and Complexity Information Design in Technical Communication (2003), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 39-58
4. DeVoss D.N., Cushman E., and Grabill J.T. Infrastructure and composing: The when of new-media writing. College Composition and Communication 57 1 (2005) 14-44
5. Digital Rhetoric Collective. Teaching digital rhetoric: Community, critical engagement, and application. DigiRhet.org. Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition, and Culture 2 1 (2006) 231-259
6. Faber B., and Johnson-Eilola Johndan. Migrations: Strategic thinking about the future(s) of technical communication. In: Barbara Mirel, and Rachel Spilka (Eds). Reshaping technical communication: New directions and challenges for the 21st century. (2002), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 135-148
7. Flacke, Marie-Louise. (2004). Technical documentation in France. In Jorg Hennig & Marita Tjarks-Sobhani (Eds.), Technical communication international: Today and the future (pp. 36-50). Schriften zur Techische Kommunikation, Band 8 (English version, Vol. 9). Lubeck: Schmidt-Romhild. in press.
8. Grabill J.T., and Hicks Troy. Multiliteracies meet methods: The case for digital writing in English education. English Education 37 4 (2005) 301-311
9. Grabill J.T., Porter J.E., Blythe S., and Miles Libby. Institutional critique revisited. Works and Days 41/42 21 (2003) 219-237
10. Hart-Davidson William. On writing, technical communication, and information technology: The core competencies of technical communication. Technical Communication 48 2 (2001) 145-155
11. Hawisher G.E., and Sullivan P.A. Fleeting images: Women visually writing the Web. In: Hawisher G.E., and Selfe C.L. (Eds). Passions, pedagogies, and 21st century technologies (1999), Utah State University Press, Logan 268-291
12. Henning Kathleen. Writing 2003: Shifting boundaries and the implications for college teaching. Teaching English in the Two-Year College 30 3 (2003) 306-316
13. Killoran J.B. Under construction: Colonization and synthetic institutionalization of web space. Computers and Composition 19 1 (2002) 19-37
14. Michigan State University (2008). Graphic standards guidelines. Retrieved May 11, 2008, from http://www2.ur.msu.edu/resources/documents/GSGuidelines.pdf
15. New London Group. A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review 66 1 (1996) 60-92
16. Porter J.E., Sullivan P., Blythe S., Grabill J.T., and Miles Libby. Institutional critique: A rhetorical methodology for change. College Composition and Communication 51 4 (2000) 610-642
17. Reich R.B. The work of nations: Preparing ourselves for 21st century capitalism (2001), Alfred A. Knopf, New York 1991
18. Rife, Martine C. (2008). Is there a chilling of digital communication? Exploring how knowledge and understanding of fair use influence web composing. Doctoral dissertation Michigan State University.
19. Sapienza Fillip. Ethos and research positionality in studies of virtual communities. In: McKee H.A., and Danielle Nicole DeVoss (Eds). Digital writing research: Technologies, methodologies, and ethical issues (2007), Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ 89-106
20. Selber, Stuart. (2004). Multiliteracies for a digital age. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois UP.
21. Selfe C.L., and Selfe Richard. The politics of the interface: Power and its exercise in electronic contact zones. College Composition and Communication 45 4 (1994) 480-504
22. Sorapure M., Inglesby P., and Yatchisin George. Web literacy: Challenges and opportunities for research in a new medium. Computers and Composition 15 3 (1998) 409-424
23. Spilka Rachel. Influencing workplace practice: A challenge for professional writing specialists in the academy. In: Rachel Spilka (Ed). Writing in the workplace: New research perspectives (1998), Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale 207-219
24. In: Sugimoto Taku. (Ed). Special issue. Global issues: International perspectives on computers and writing. Computers and Composition 24 3 (2007)
25. Sullivan P.A., and Porter J.E. Remapping curricular geography: Professional writing in/and English. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 7 (1993) 389-422
26. WIDE Research Center Collective. (2005). Why teach digital writing? Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy, 10(1). Retrieved January 8, 2006, from http://english.ttu.edu/Kairos/10.1/binder2.html?coverweb/wide/index.html
27. Williams Robin. The non-designers design book: Design and typographic principles for the visual novice (2004), Peachpit Press, Berkley, CA
28. Wysocki A.F. Impossibly distinct: On form/content and word/image in two pieces of computer-based interactive multimedia. Computers and Composition 18 2 (2001) 137-162
29. Wysocki A.Frances., and Jasken J.I. What should be an unforgettable face.... Computers and Composition 21 1 (2004) 29-48