Institutional change in the international governance of agriculture: A revised account

Governance

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 483-506

  Kay, Adrian ^a   Ackrill, Robert ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b NOTTINGHAM TRENT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 68249113739     PISSN: 09521895     EISSN: 14680491     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01448.x     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ackrill, Robert. 2000. The Common Agricultural Policy. Sheffield, UK : Sheffield Academic Press.
2. Ackrill, Robert Adrian Kay. 2005 Common Agricultural Policy In Handbook of Public Administration and Policy in the European Union, ed. Peter Van Der Hoek. Boca Raton, FL : CRC Press.
3. Ackrill, Robert Adrian Kay. 2009 Historical Learning in the Design of WTO Rules: The EC Sugar Case The World Economy 32 : 754 771.
4. Baldwin, Robert E. 2000 Pragmatism versus Principle in GATT Decision-Making: A Brief Historical Perspective In From GATT to the WTO: The Multilateral Trading System in the New Millennium, ed. WTO Secretariat. The Hague : Kluwer Law International.
5. Barton, John H., Judith L. Goldstein, Timothy E. Josling Richard H. Steinberg. 2006. The Evolution of the Trade Regime: Politics Law and Economics of the GATT and the WTO. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
6. Castel, Jean-Gabriel. 1989 The Uruguay Round and the Improvements to the GATT Dispute Settlement Rules and Procedures The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 38 : 834 849.
7. Chaytor, Beatrice. 1998 Dispute Settlement under the GATT/WTO: The Experience of Developing Nations In Dispute Resolution in the World Trade Organisation, ed. James Cameron Karen Campbell. London : Cameron May.
8. Cohn, Theodore H. 1993 The Changing Role of the United States in the Global Agricultural Trade Regime In World Agriculture and the GATT, ed. William P. Avery. Boulder, CO : Lynne Rienner.
9. Davis, Christina L. 2003. Food Fights over Free Trade: How International Institutions Promote Agricultural Trade Liberalization. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
10. Davis, Christina. 2009 Overlapping Institutions in Trade Policy Perspectives on Politics 7 : 25 32.
11. Delcros, Fabian. 2002 The Legal Status of Agriculture in the World Trade Organization: State of Play at the Start of the Negotiations Journal of World Trade 36 : 219 253. (Pubitemid 41408828)
12. Fearon, James D. 1998 Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation International Organization 52 : 269 305. (Pubitemid 128436060)
13. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. 1955a Remarks of the Chairman of the Contracting Parties Ambassador L. Dana Wilgress (Canada), Delivered at the Conclusion of the Ninth Session of the Contracting Parties to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade L/348, March 8.
14. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. 1955b Waiver Granted to the United States in Connexion with Import Restrictions Imposed under Section 22 of the United States Agricultural Adjustment Act Working Party 9 on U.S. Waiver (AAA): Draft Report of the Working Party. W.10/29, November 26.
15. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. 1979 European Communities - Refunds on Exports of Sugar: Complaint by Australia. Report of the Panel L/4833, October 25, 1979.
16. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. 1980 European Communities - Refunds on Exports of Sugar: Complaint by Brazil. Report of the Panel L/5011, October 7, 1980.
17. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. 1982 Contribution to Ministerial Meeting: Communication from Australia SCM/24, June 1, 1982.
18. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. 1983 Analysis of the Drafting History of Article XVI and of the Work of Past Panels and Working Parties as Regards Subsidies on Agricultural Products: Note by the Secretariat AG/W/4, September 12, 1983.
19. Goldstein, Judith. 1998 International Institutions and Domestic Politics: GATT, WTO, and the Liberalization of International Trade In The WTO as an International Organization, ed. Anne Krueger. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
20. Goodin, Robert E. 1996 Institutions and Their Design In The Theory of Institutional Design, ed. Robert E. Goodin. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
21. Grant, Wyn. 2005 Agricultural Trade In The Politics of International Trade in the Twenty-First Century, ed. Dominic Kelly Wyn Grant. London : Palgrave.
22. Hart, Oliver. 1987 Incomplete Contracts In The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, ed. John Eatwell, Murray Milgate Peter Newman. London : Macmillan.
23. Huber, John D. Charles R. Shipan. 2002. Deliberate Discretion? The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
24. Hudec, Robert E. 1987 Transcending the Ostensible': Some Reflections on the Nature of Litigation between Governments Minnesota Law Review 72 : 211 226.
25. Hudec, Robert E. 1993. Enforcing International Trade Law: The Evolution of the Modern GATT Legal System. Salem, NH : Butterworth.
26. Hudec, Robert E. 1996 International Economic Law: The Political Theatre Dimension University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 17 : 9 15.
27. Hudec, Robert E. 1998 Does the Agreement on Agriculture Work? Agricultural Disputes after the Uruguay Round Working Paper 98-2, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
28. Ingersent, Kenneth A. Anthony J. Rayner. 1999. Agricultural Policy in Western Europe and the United States. Cheltenham, UK : Edward Elgar.
29. Jackson, John H. 1997. The World Trading System: Law and Policy of International Economic Relations. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
30. Josling, Timothy Stefan Tangermann. 2003 Production and Export Subsidies in Agriculture: Lessons from GATT and WTO Disputes Involving the U.S. and the E.C In Transatlantic Economic Disputes: The EU, the U.S., and the WTO, ed. Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann Mark A. Pollack. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
31. Josling, Timothy, Stefan Tangermann Thorald K. Warley. 1996. Agriculture in the GATT. Basingstoke, UK : Macmillan.
32. Kay, Adrian. 1998. The Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy. Wallingford : CABI.
33. Kenyon, Don and David Lee. 2006. The Struggle for Trade Liberalisation in Agriculture: Australia and the Cairns Group in the Uruguay Round. Australia in the World: The Foreign Affairs and Trade Files No. 4. Canberra : Australian Government, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.
34. Koremenos, Barbara. 2001 Loosening the Ties that Bind: A Learning Model of Agreement Flexibility International Organization 55 : 289 325. (Pubitemid 33585629)
35. Koremenos, Barbara, Charles Lipson Duncan Snidal. 2001 The Rational Design of International Institutions International Organization 55 : 761 799. (Pubitemid 33594225)
36. Lipson, Charles. 1983 The Transformation of Trade: The Sources and Effects of Regime Change In International Regimes, ed. Stephen D. Krasner. Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press.
37. McMahon, Joseph A. 1998 Going Bananas? - Dispute Resolution in Agriculture In Dispute Resolution in the World Trade Organisation, ed. James Cameron Karen Campbell. London : Cameron May.
38. McMahon, Joseph A. 2007. EU Agricultural Law. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
39. Ostry, Sylvia. 2000 Looking Back to Look Forward: The Multilateral Trading System after 50 years In From GATT to the WTO: The Multilateral Trading System in the New Millennium, ed. WTO Secretariat. The Hague : Kluwer Law International.
40. Paarlberg, Robert. 1997 Agricultural Policy Reform and the Uruguay Round: Synergistic Linkage in a Two-Level Game? International Organization 51 : 413 444.
41. Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
42. Podbury, Troy Ivan Roberts. 2003 Opening Agricultural Markets through Tariff Cuts in the WTO Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics eReport 03.2/Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation Publication 03/011 http://www.rirdc.gov.au/reports/GLC/03-011.pdf October 1, 2007).
43. Polk County Democrats. 2007 Harkin Disappointed with WTO Decision on Compliance in Brazil Cotton Case Press Release, Friday, July 27, 2007 http://www.polkcountydemocrats.org/ht/display/ReleaseDetails/i/1045663/pid/ 318480 October 1, 2007).
44. Putnam, Robert D. 1988 Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games International Organization 42 : 427 460.
45. Schnepf, Randy. 2008 Brazil's WTO Case against the U.S. Cotton Program Congressional Research Service Report for Congress order code RL32571, updated January 25, 2008 http://www.nationalaglawcenter.org/assets/crs/RL32571.pdf October 1, 2007).
46. Schott, Jeffrey J. 1994. The Uruguay Round: An Assessment. Washington, DC : Institute for International Economics.
47. Steger, Debra P. Susan M. Hainsworth. 1998 New Directions in International Trade Law: WTO Dispute Settlement In Dispute Resolution in the World Trade Organisation, ed. James Cameron Karen Campbell. London : Cameron May.
48. Swinbank, Alan. 2004 Dirty Tariffication Revisited; The EU and Sugar The Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy 5 : 56 69.
49. Warley, Thorald K. 1976 Western Trade in Agricultural Products In International Relations in the Western World 1959-1971, ed. Andrew Shonfield. Oxford : Oxford University Press for the Royal Institute for International Affairs.
50. Wiener, Jarrod. 1995. Making Rules in the Uruguay Round of the GATT: A Study of International Leadership. Aldershot, UK : Dartmouth.
51. Wolfe, Robert. 1998. Farm Wars: The Political Economy of Agriculture and the International Trade Regime. Basingstoke, UK : Macmillan.
52. World Trade Organization. 2004 European Communities - Export Subsidies on Sugar. Complaint by Australia: Report of the Panel WT/DS265/R, October 15, 2004.
53. World Trade Organization. 2005 European Communities - Export Subsidies on Sugar. AB-2005-2: Report of the Appellate Body WT/DS265/AB/R, April 28, 2005.