Preoperative diagnosis of ovarian malignancy: Preliminary results of the use of 3-dimensional vascular ultrasound

International Journal of Gynecological Cancer

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 354-360

  Chase, Dana M ^a   Crade, Michael ^a   Basu, Tania ^a   Saffari, Bahman ^a   Berman, Michael L ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

2D ultrasound; 3D ultrasound; CA 125; Ovarian neoplasm; Pelvic masses; Preoperative evaluation

Indexed keywords

CA 125 ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BENIGN TUMOR; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OVARY CANCER; PELVIS; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; THREE DIMENSIONAL VASCULAR ULTRASOUND; ULTRASOUND; VASCULARIZATION;

ADENOCARCINOMA, CLEAR CELL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CARCINOMA, PAPILLARY; CYSTADENOCARCINOMA, SEROUS; ENDOMETRIAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MIDDLE AGED; OVARIAN NEOPLASMS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER, COLOR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 68149179690     PISSN: 1048891X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181a1d73e     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Olivier RI, Lubsen-Brandsma MAC, Verhoef S., et al. CA-125 and transvaginal ultrasound monitoring in high-risk women cannot prevent the diagnosis of advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;100:20-26.
2. Alcazar JL, Castillo G. Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional power-Doppler imaging in complex adnexal masses for the prediction of ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005:192;807-812.
3. Ferrazzi E., Lissoni AA, Dordoni D., et al. Differentiation of small adnexal masses based on morphologic characteristics of transvaginal sonographic imaging: a multicenter study. J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24:1467-1473.
4. Stein SM, Leifer-Narin S., Johnson MB, et al. Differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses: relative value of grey-scale, color Doppler and spectral Doppler sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164:381-386.
5. Timmerman D., Testa AC, Bourne T., et al. Logistic regression model to distinguish between the benign and malignant adnexal mass before surgery: a multicenter study by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Group. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:8794-8801.
6. Tekay A., Jouppila P. Validity of pulsatility and resistance indices in classification of adnexal tumors with transvaginal color Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1992;2:338-344.
7. Valentin L., Sladkevicius P., Marsal K. Limited contribution of Doppler velocimetry to the differential diagnosis of extrauterine pelvic tumors. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;83:425-433.
8. Tailor A., Jurkovic D., Bourne TH, et al. Sonographic prediction of malignancy in adnexal masses using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997;10:41-47.
9. Kurjak A., Kupesic S. Transvaginal color Doppler and pelvic tumor angiogenesis: lessons learned and future challenges. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995;6:145-159.
10. Mikhaleva LM, Moroz EA, Solomatina AA, et al. Comparative evaluation of blood vessels in serous tumors of the ovaries by color Doppler mapping and morphometry. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2002;133:188-191.
11. Hata T., Yanagihara T., Hayashi K., et al. Three-dimensional ultrasonography evaluation of ovarian tumors: a preliminary study. Human Reprod. 1999;14:3150-3151.
12. Kurjak A., Kupesic S. Three-dimensional ultrasound and power Doppler in assessment of uterine and ovarian angiogenesis: a prospective study. Croat Med J. 1999;40:413-420.
13. Parleitner H., Steiner H., Hasenoehrl G., et al. Three-dimensional power Doppler sonography: imaging and quantifying blood flow and vascularization. Ultrsound Obstet Gynecol. 1999;14:139-143.
14. Cohen LS, Escobar PF, Scharm C., et al. Three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound improves the diagnostic accuracy for ovarian cancer prediction. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;82:40-48.
15. Alcazar JL, Galan MJ, Garcia-Manero M., et al. Three-dimensional sonographic morphologic assessment in complex adnexal masses: preliminary experience. J Ultrasound Med. 2003;22:249-254.
16. Alcazar JL, Merce LT, Manero MG. Three-dimensional power Doppler vascular sampling, a new method for predicting ovarian cancer in vascularized complex adnexal masses. J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24:689-696.
17. Alcázar JL, Garćia-Manero M., Galván R. Three-dimensional sonographic morphologic assessment of adnexal masses: a reproducibility study. J Ultrasound Med. 2007;26:1007-1011.
18. Sladkevicius P., Jokubkiene L., Valentin L. Contribution of morphological assessment of the vessel tree by three-dimensional ultrasound to a correct diagnosis of malignancy in ovarian masses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30:874-882.
19. Jokubkiene L., Sladkevicius P., Valentin L. Does three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound help in discrimination between benign and malignant ovarian masses?. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29:215-225.
20. Laban M., Metawee H., Elyan A., et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound and three-dimensional power Doppler in the assessment of ovarian tumors. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007;99:201-205.
21. Crade M., Berman M., Chase D. Three-dimensional tissue block ultrasound in ovarian tumors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;26:683-686.
22. Rufford BD, Jacobs IJ. Ovarian cysts in postmenopausal women. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Guideline No. 34, October 2003.
23. Myers ER, Bastian LA, Havrilesky LJ, et al. Management of adnexal mass. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 130. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2006; (Prepared by the Duke Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-02-0025) AHRQ Publication No. 06-E004.
24. Kurjak A., Kupesic S., Sparac V., et al. Preoperative evaluation of pelvic tumors by Doppler and three-dimensional sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2001;20:829-840.
25. Kurjak A., Kupesic S., Sparac V., et al. The detection of stage I ovarian cancer by three-dimensional sonography and power Doppler. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;90:258-264.
26. Kurjak A., Prka M., Arena JM, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasonography and power Doppler in ovarian cancer screening of asymptomatic peri-and postmenopausal women. Croat Med J. 2005;46:757-764.
27. Guerriero S., Ajossa S., Melis GB. Is three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound better than two dimensional power Doppler? Gynecol Oncol. 2002;84:352-353.
28. Alcazar JL, Castillo G. Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional power Doppler imaging in complex adnexal masses for the prediction of ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:807-812.
29. Kurjak A., Kupesic S., Sparac V., et al. Three-dimensional ultrasonographic and power Doppler characterization of ovarian lesions. Ultrsound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;16:365-371.
30. Alcázar JL, Rodriguez D., Royo P., et al. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of 3-dimensional power Doppler vascular indices in assessment of solid and cystic-solid adnexal masses. J Ultrasound Med. 2008;27:1-6.