Three-dimensional power doppler ultrasound improves the diagnostic accuracy for ovarian cancer prediction

Gynecologic Oncology

Volumn 82, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 40-48

  Cohen, Leeber S ^a   Escobar, Pedro F ^a   Scharm, Carol ^a   Glimco, Beth ^a   Fishman, David A ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adnexal mass; Ovarian cancer; Three dimensional power Doppler

Indexed keywords

ADULT; APPARATUS; ARTICLE; BENIGN TUMOR; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DOPPLER ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; METASTASIS; OVARY CANCER; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT REFERRAL; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0034931954     PISSN: 00908258     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/gyno.2001.6253     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Three-dimensional ultrasound evaluation of ovarian masses
2. The assessment of ovarian tumor angiogenesis: What does three-dimensional power Doppler add?
3. Evaluation of adnexal masses using three-dimensional ultrasonographic technology: Preliminary report
4. Three-dimensional ultrasound and power Doppler improve the diagnosis of ovarian lesions
5. Is avoidance of surgery possible in patients with perimenopausal ovarian tumors using transvaginal ultrasound and duplex color Doppler sonography?
6. The malignant potential of small cystic ovarian tumors in women over 50 years of age
7. The postmenopausal cystic adnexal mass: The potential role of ultrasound in conservative management
8. Preoperative evaluation of ovarian tumors in the premenopause by transvaginosonography
9. Diagnosis of adnexal malignancies by using color Doppler energy imaging as a secondary test in persistent masses
10. Transvaginal sonographic characterization of ovarian disease: Evaluation of a new scoring system to predict malignancy
11. Transvaginal ultrasonographic characterization of ovarian masses with an improved, weighted score
12. Transvaginal ultrasonographic characterization of ovarian masses: A comparison of five scoring systems in a multicenter trial
13. Evaluation of adnexal masses with transvaginal color ultrasound
14. Assessment of ovarian tumor vascularity with transvaginal color Doppler sonography
15. Transvaginal ultrasonographic characterization of ovarian masses by means of color flow-directed Doppler measurements and a morphologic scoring system
16. Validity of pulsatility and resistance indices in classification of adnexal tumors with transvaginal color Doppler ultrasound
17. Limited contribution of Doppler velocimetry to the differential diagnosis of extrauterine pelvic tumors
18. Comparison between sonographic morphology and Doppler waveform for the diagnosis of ovarian malignancy
19. The current status of ultrasound and color Doppler imaging in screening for ovarian cancer
20. Should clinical decisions be made about ovarian masses using transvaginal color Doppler?
21. Blood flow in benign ovarian tumors and normal ovaries during the follicular phase
22. Consensus Development Panel on ovarian cancer
23. Sonographic prediction of malignancy in adnexal masses using multivariate logistic regression analysis
24. Comparison of transvaginal color Doppler imaging and color Doppler energy for assessment of intraovarian blood flow
25. Pattern recognition of pelvic masses by gray-scale ultrasound imaging: The contribution of Doppler ultrasound
26. Echo-patterns of benign cystic teratomas by transvaginal ultrasound
27. A comparison of preoperative ultrasound images of surgically proven endometriomas scanned by both transabdominal and transvaginal techniques
28. Combined transvaginal B-mode and color Doppler sonography for differential diagnosis of ovarian tumors: Results of a multivariate logistic regression analysis
29. The performance of screening tests for ovarian cancer: Results of a systematic review
30. The efficacy of transvaginal sonographic screening in asymptomatic women at risk for ovarian cancer
31. Prospective evaluation of logistic regression models for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer