Prognosis prediction for class III malocclusion treatment by feature wrapping method

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 79, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 683-691

  Kim, Bo Mi ^a   Kang, Bo Yeong ^a   Kim, Hong Gee ^a   Baek, Seung Hak ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Class III malocclusion; Feature wrapping method; Prognosis prediction; Sequential forward search algorithm; Support vector machine

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FORECASTING; HUMAN; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROGNOSIS;

ALGORITHMS; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FORECASTING; HUMANS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS III; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROGNOSIS;

EID: 68149159292     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/071508-371.1     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ngan P, Hägg U, Yiu C, Merwin D, Wei SH. Soft tissue and dentoskeletal profile changes associated with maxillary expansion and protraction headgear treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;109:38-49.
2. Westwood PV, McNamara JA Jr, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Sarver DM. Long-term effects of Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 123:306-320. (Pubitemid 36875908)
3. Harris JE, Kowalski CJ, Walker SJ. Dentofacial differences between 'normal' sibs of Class II and Class III patients. Angle Orthod. 1975;45:103-107.
4. Yang WS, Kim BH. The retrospective study on the indication of the chin cap therapy. Korean J Orthod. 1995;25:1-12.
5. Sung JH, Kwon OW, Kim SD. The retrospective study on the prognosis of Class III malocclusion treatments. Korean J Orthod. 1998;28:175-187.
6. Schulhof RJ, Nakamura S, Williamson WV. Prediction of abnormal growth in Class III malocclusions. Am J Orthod. 1977;71:421-430.
7. Battagel JM. Discriminant analysis: a model for the prediction of relapse in Class III children treated orthodontically by a non-extraction technique. Eur J Orthod. 1993;15:199-209.
8. Battagel JM. Predictors of relapse in orthodontically treated Class III malocclusions. Eur J Orthod. 1994;21:1-13.
9. Franchi L, Bacceti T, Tollaro I. Predictive variables for the outcome of early functional treatment of class III malocclu-sion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112:80-86.
10. Tahmina K, Tanaka E, Tanne K. Craniofacial morphology in orthodontically treated patients of class III malocclusion with stable and unstable treatment outcomes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;117:681-690.
11. Zentner A, Doll GM, Peylo SM. Morphological parameter as predictors of successful correction of class III malocclusion. Eur J Orthod. 2001;23:383-392.
12. Schuster G, Lux CJ, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A. Children with class III malocclusion: development of multivariate statistical models to predict future need for orthognathic surgery. Angle Orthod. 2003;93:136-145.
13. Alhaija Abu ES, Richardson A. Growth prediction in Class III patients using cluster and discriminant function analysis. Eur J Orthod. 2003;25:599-608.
14. Ko YI, Baek SH, Yang WS. Determinants of successful chin cup therapy in skeletal class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;126:33-41.
15. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA. Cephalometric variables predicting the long term success or failure of combined rapid maxillary expansion and facial mask therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;126:16-22.
16. Moon YM, Ahn SJ, Chang YI. Cephalometric predictors of long term stability in the early treatment of Class III maloc-clusion. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:747-753.
17. Chen F, Terada K, Hanada K. A special method of predicting mandibular growth potential for class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:191-195.
18. Ghiz MA, Ngan P, Gunel E. Cephalometric variables to predict future success of early orthopedic Class III treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;127:301-306.
19. Cedeño W, Agrafiotis DK. Using particle swarms for the development of QSAR models based on K-nearest neighbor and kernel regression. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2003;17: 255-263.
20. Sahiner B, Chan HP, Petrick N, Wagner RF, Hadjiiski L. Feature selection and classifier performance in computer-aided diagnosis: the effect of finite sample size. Med Phys. 2000;27:1509-1522.
21. Bullinger D, Frohlich H, Klaus F, Neubauer H, Fricken-schmidt A, Henneges C, et al. Bioinformatical evaluation of modified nucleosides as biomedical markers in diagnosis of breast cancer. Anal Chim Acta. 2008;618:29-34.
22. Kawai K, Fujishima S, Takahashi Y. Predictive activity profiling of drugs by topological-fragment-spectra-based support vector machines. J Chem Inf Model. 2008;48:1152-1160.
23. Judson R, Elloumi F, Setzer RW, Li Z, Shah I. A comparison of machine learning algorithms for chemical toxicity classification using a simulated multi-scale data model. MCBioin-formatics. 2008;9:241.
24. Dahlberg G. Statistical Methods for Medical and Biological Students. London, UK: Allen & Unwin; 1940.
25. Pudil P, Novovicova J. Novel methods for subset selection with respect to problem knowledge. IEEE Intelligent Systems. 1998;10:66-74.
26. Burges CJC. A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition: data mining and knowledge. Discovery. 1998;2:121-167.
27. Meyer D, Leisch F, Hornik K. The support vector machine under test. Neurocomputing. 2003;55:169-186.
28. Jolliffe IT. Principal Component Analysis. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 2002;150-166.
29. Lee KS. A roentgenocephalometric study on mandibular prognathism. Korean J Orthod. 1979;9:85-97.
30. Guyer EC, Ellis EE III, McNamara JA Jr, Behrents RG. Components of Class III malocclusion in juveniles and adolescents. Angle Orthod. 1986;56:7-30.