Morphological parameters as predictors of successful correction of Class III malocclusion

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 383-392

  Zentner, Andrej ^a   Doll, Gerhard Michael ^b   Peylo, Stephan Matthias ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER MAINZ   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CHIN; DENTAL CARE; FOLLOW UP; FORECASTING; HUMAN; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; ORTHODONTICS; PATHOLOGY; PEER REVIEW; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL MODEL; TOOTH; TOOTH ARCH; TOOTH OCCLUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGE FACTORS; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CHIN; DENTAL ARCH; DENTAL MODELS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FORECASTING; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS III; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; PEER REVIEW, HEALTH CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOOTH; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERTICAL DIMENSION;

EID: 0035431097     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/23.4.383     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Aelbers C M F, Dermaut L R 1996 Orthopedics in orthodontics: part I, fiction or reality - a review of the literature. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 110: 513-519
2. Backhaus K, Erichson B, Plinke W, Weiber R 1994 Multivariate Analysemethoden. Springer, Berlin
3. Battagel J M 1993a Discriminant analysis: a model for the prediction of relapse in Class III children treated orthodontically by a non-extraction technique. European Journal of Orthodontics 15: 199-209
4. Battagel J M 1993b A comparative assessment of cephalometric errors. European Journal of Orthodontics 15: 305-314
5. Battagel J M 1994 Predictors of relapse in orthodontically-treated Class III malocclusions. British Journal of Orthodontics 21: 1-13
6. Berg R 1979 Post-retention analysis of treatment problems and failures in 264 consecutively treated cases. European Journal of Orthodontics 1: 55-68
7. Brodie A G 1938 Analysis of changes during and subsequent to ortho-management of Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthodontist 8: 330-352
8. Dermaut L R, Aelbers C M F 1996 Orthopedics in orthodontics: fiction or reality. A review of the literature, part II. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 110: 667-671
9. Franchi L, Baccetti T, Tollaro I 1997 Predictive variables for the outcome of early functional treatment of Class III malocclusion. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 112: 80-86
10. Haynes S 1970 The prevalence of malocclusion in English school children aged 11-12 years. Transactions of the European Orthodontic Society, pp. 89-98
11. Johnston L E 1968 A statistical evaluation of cephalometric prediction. Angle Orthodontist 38: 284-304
12. Keß K, Koch R, Witt E 1991 Ergebnisse zur Prävalenz von Zahnfehlstellungen bzw. Okklusionsstörungen. In: Micheelis W, Bauch J (eds) Mundgesundheitszustand und verhalten in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Ergebnisse des nationalen IDZ-Suvey 1989. Deutscher Ärzte-Verlag, Cologne, pp. 297-334
13. McNamara J A Jr 1984 A method of cephalometric evaluation. American Journal of Orthodontics 86: 449-469
14. Proffit W R 1991 The search for truth: diagnosis. In: Proffit W R, White R P Jr (eds) Surgical-orthodontic treatment. Mosby, St Louis, pp. 96-141
15. Proffit W R 2000 Contemporary orthodontics. Mosby, St Louis
16. Rees D J 1953 A method for assessing the proportional relation of apical bases and contact diameters of the teeth. American Journal of Orthodontics 39: 695-707
17. Richmond S, Shaw W C, Andrews M, Roberts C T 1992 The PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): Methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards. European Journal of Orthodontics 14: 180-187
18. Schwarz A M 1961 Roentgenostatics. A practical evaluation of the X-ray headplate. American Journal of Orthodontics 47: 561-585
19. Sergl H G, Kerr W J S, McColl J H 1996 A method of measuring the apical base. European Journal of Orthodontics 18: 479-483
20. Stensland A, Wisth P J, Böe O E 1988 Dentofacial changes in children with negative overjet by a combined orthodontic and orthopaedic approach. European Journal of Orthodontics 10: 39-51
21. Thilander B, Myrberg N 1973 The prevalence of malocclusion in Swedish schoolchildren. Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research 81: 12-20
22. Zentner A, Doll G M 2001 Size discrepancy of apical bases and treatment success in Angle Class III malocclusion. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics 62: 97-106