Children with class III malocclusion: Development of multivariate statistical models to predict future need for orthognathic surgery

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 73, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 136-145

  Schuster, Gabriele ^a   Lux, Christopher J ^b   Stellzig Eisenhauer, Angelika ^c  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Class III malocclusion; Craniofacial growth; Discriminant analysis; Logistic regression; Multivariate statistics; Prediction; Surgery

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCISOR; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ORTHODONTICS; PREDICTION; SCHOOL CHILD; STATISTICAL MODEL; TREATMENT PLANNING; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; FORECASTING; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MULTICENTER STUDY; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PALATE; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PUBERTY; STATISTICS;

ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FORECASTING; HUMANS; INCISOR; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS III; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; PALATE; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PUBERTY;

EID: 0038505068     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Ngan P, Hagg U, Yiu C, Merwin D, Wie SH. Cephalometric comparisons of Chinese and Caucasian surgical Class III patients. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 1997;12:177-188.
2. Battagel JM. The aetiological factors in Class III malocclusion. Eur J Orthod. 1993;15:347-370.
3. Sanborn RT. Differences between the facial skeletal patterns of Class III malocclusion and normal occlusion. Angle Orthod. 1955;25:208-222.
4. Jacobson A, Evans WG, Preston CG, Sadowsky PL. Mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod. 1974;66:140-171.
5. Schulhof RJ, Nakamura S, Williamson WV. Prediction of abnormal growth in Class III malocclusions. Am J Orthod. 1977;71:421-430.
6. Ellis E, McNamara JA. Components of adult Class III malocclusion. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1984;42:295-305.
7. Guyer EC, Ellis EE, McNamara JA Jr, Behrents RG. Components of Class III malocclusion in juveniles and adolescents. Angle Orthod. 1986;56:7-30.
8. Williams S, Andersen CE. The morphology of the potential Class III skeletal pattern in the growing child. Am J Orthod. 1986;89:302-311.
9. Johnston LE. A statistical evaluation of cephalometric prediction. Angle Orthod. 1968;38:284-304.
10. Ricketts RM. Planning treatment on the basis of the facial pattern and an estimate of its growth. Angle Orthod. 1957;27:103-133.
11. Greenberg LZ, Johnston LE. Computerized prediction: the accuracy of a contemporary long-range forecast. Am J Orthod. 1975;67:243-252.
12. Toepel-Sievers C, Fischer-Brandies H. Validity of the computer-assisted cephalometric growth prognosis VTO (visual treatment objective) according to Ricketts. J Orofac Orthop. 1999;60:185-194.
13. Witt E, Köran I. Studies on the validity of computer growth predictions. Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1982;43:139-159.
14. Skieller V, Björk A, Linde-Hanson T. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation evaluated from a longitudinal implant sample. Am J Orthod. 1984;86:359-370.
15. Nanda RS. The contributions of craniofacial growth to clinical orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;117:553-555.
16. Bishara SM. Facial and dental changes in adolescents and their clinical implication. Angle Orthod. 2000;70:471-483.
17. Keeling SD, Riolo ML, Martin RE, Ten Have TR. A multivariate approach to analyzing the relation between occlusion and craniofacial morphology. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;95:297-305.
18. Battagel JM. The identification of Class III malocclusions by discriminant analysis. Eur J Orthod. 1994;16:71-80.
19. Jäger A, Zittlau O, Luhr HG. Zur differentialdiagnostischen Wertigkeit von skelettalen, dentalen und Weichteilanalysen bei der Planung der kieferorthopädisch-kieferchirurgischen Therapie. Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1994;55:269-278.
20. Franchi L, Baccetti T, Tollaro I. Predictive variables for the outcome of early functional treatment of Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;11:80-86.
21. Norusis MJ. Spss/PC+ Advanced Statistics V2.0. Chicago, Ill: SPSS; 1988:1-39.
22. Richmond S, Aylott NA, Panahei ME, Rolfe B, Tausche EA. 2-Center comparison of orthodontist's perceptions of orthodontic treatment difficulty. Angle Orthod. 2001;71:404-410.
23. Marcin JP, Slonim AD, Pollack MM, Ruttimann UE. Long-stay patients in the pediatric intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:652-657.
24. Stewart SH, Silverstein MD. Racial and ethnic disparity in blood pressure and cholesterol measurement. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17:405-411.
25. Kowalski CJ, Nasjleti CE, Walker GF. Differential diagnosis of adult male black and white populations. Angle Orthod. 1974;44:346-350.
26. Kowalski CJ, Nasjleti CE, Walker GF. Dentofacial variations within and between four groups of adult American males. Angle Orthod. 1975;45:146-151.
27. Nakasima A, Ichinose M. Role of parental variables in predicting facial growth after treatment of anterior crossbite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1986;90:492-500.
28. Tahmina K, Tanaka E, Tanne K. Craniofacial morphology in orthodontically treated patients of Class III malocclusion with stable and unstable treatment outcomes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;117:681-690.
29. Miyajima K, McNamara JA Jr, Murata S. A diagnostic index of vertical problems for Class III malocclusions. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 1997;12:189-195.
30. Ishikawa H, Nakamura S, Iwasaki H, Kitazawa S, Tsukada H, Chu S. Dentoalveolar compensation in negative overjet cases. Angle Orthod. 2000;70:145-148.
31. Stensland A, Wisth PJ, Boe OE. Dentofacial changes in children with negative overjet treated by a combined orthodontic and orthopaedic approach. Eur J Orthod. 1988;10:39-51.
32. Battagel JM. Discriminant analysis: a model for the prediction of relapse in Class III children treated orthodontically by a non-extraction technique. Eur J Orthod. 1993;15:199-209.
33. Battagel JM. Predictors of relapse in orthodontically-treated Class III malocclusions. Br J Orthod. 1994;21:1-13.
34. Tollaro I, Baccetti T, Franchi L. Craniofacial changes induced by early functional treatment of Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;109:310-318.
35. Ishikawa H, Nakamura S, Kim C, Iwasaki H, Satoh Y, Yoshida S. Individual growth in Class III malocclusions and its relationship to the chin cap effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;114:337-346.
36. Baccetti T, McGill JS, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr, Tollaro I. Skeletal effects of early treatment of Class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion and face-mask therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113:333-343.
37. Stellzig-Eisenhauer A, Lux CJ, Schuster G. Treatment decision in adult patients with Class III malocclusion: orthodontic therapy or orthognatic surgery? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;122:27-38.
38. Panagiotidis G, Witt E. Der individualisierte ANB. Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1977;38:408-416.
39. Schopf P. Kephalometrische "Normwerte" für die Stellung der Inzisivi - eine mögliche Ursache für den Misserfolg kieferorthopädischer Behandlungen? Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1988;49:37-47.
40. Dahlberg G. Statistical for Medical and Psychological Students. New York, NY: Interscience; 1940.
41. Houston WJB. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod. 1983;83:382-390.
42. Jacobson A. Growth and its relation to orthodontic treatment. J Oral Surg. 1981;39:817-826.
43. Hixon EH. Prediction of facial growth. Trans Eur Orthod Soc. 1968;127-139.
44. Baumrind S, Frantz RC. The reliability of head film measurements. 1. Landmark identification. Am J Orthod. 1971;60:111-127.
45. Freisfeld M. Fehlerquellen an Einzeichenserien kephalometrischer Bezugspunkte. Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1973;34:296-306.
46. Allen RA, Connolly IH, Richardson A. Early treatment of Class III incisor relationship using the chin cap appliance. Eur J Orthod. 1993;15:371-376.
47. Proffit WR, Ackerman JL. A systematic approach to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. In: Graber TM, Swain BF, eds. Current Orthodontic Concept and Techniques. 3rd ed. St Louis, Mo: CV Mosby; 1985:15-148.
48. Kerr WJS, Miller S, Dawber JE. Class III malocclusion: surgery or orthodontics? Br J Orthod. 1992;19:21-24.
49. Björk A. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation. Am J Orthod. 1969;55:585-599.
50. Riedel RA. The relation of the maxillary structures to the cranium in malocclusion and normal occlusion. Angle Orthod. 1952;22:140-145.
51. Moore AW. Observations on facial growth and its clinical significance. Am J Orthod. 1959;42:399-423.
52. Enlow DH. A morphogenetic analysis of facial growth. Am J Orthod. 1966;52:283-299.
53. Taylor CM. Changes in the relationship of nasion, point A and B and the effect upon ANB. Am J Orthod. 1969;56:143-163.
54. Jacobson A. The "Wits" appraisal of jaw disharmony. Am J Orthod. 1975;67:125-138.
55. Ferrazzini G. Critical evaluation of the ANB angle. Am J Orthod. 1976;69:620-626.
56. Roth R. The "Wits" appraisal - its skeletal and dento-alveolar background. Eur J Orthod. 1982;4:21-28.
57. Rotberg S, Fried N, Kane J, Shapiro E. Predicting the "Wits" appraisal from the ANB angle. Am J Orthod. 1980;77:636-642.
58. Bishara SE, Fahl JA, Peterson LC. Longitudinal changes in the ANB angle and Wits appraisal: clinical implications. Am J Orthod. 1983;84:133-139.
59. Rushton R, Cohen AM, Linney AD. The relationship and reproducibility of angle ANB and the Wits appraisal. Br J Orthod. 1991;18:225-231.
60. Jarvinen S. The relation of the Wits appraisal to the ANB angle: a statistical appraisal. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;94:432-435.
61. Hurmerinta K, Rahkamo A, Haavikko K. Comparison between cephalometric classification methods for sagittal jaw relationships. Eur J Oral Sci. 1997;105:221-227.
62. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Miani A Jr, Tartaglia GM. The use of linear and angular measurements of maxillo-mandibular anteroposterior discrepancies. Clin Orthod Res. 1999;2:34-41.
63. Haynes S, Chau MN. The reproducibility and repeatability of the Wits analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;107:640-647.
64. Sherman SL, Woods M, Nanda RS, Currier GF. The longitudinal effects of growth on the Wits appraisal. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;93:429-436.
65. Nanda RS, Merrill RM. Cephalometric assessment of sagittal relationship between maxilla and mandible. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;105:328-344.
66. Tsang WM, Cheung LK, Samman N. Cephalometric parameters affecting severity of anterior open bite. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;26:321-326.
67. Ishikawa H, Nakamura S, Iwasaki H, Kitazawa S, Tsukada H, Sato Y. Dentoalveolar compensation related to variations in sagittal jaw relationships. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:534-538.
68. Hirschfeld WJ, Moyers RE. Prediction of craniofacial growth: the state of the art. Am J Orthod. 1971;60:435-444.
69. Press JS, Wilson S. Choosing between logistic regression and discriminant analysis. J Am Stat Assoc. 1978;73:699-705.