Language factors associated with achievement grouping in math classrooms: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study

School Effectiveness and School Improvement

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 27-45

  Chang, Mido ^a   Singh, Kusum ^a   Filer, Kimberly ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Achievement grouping; Cross sectional study; Language minority students; Large scale data analysis; Longitudinal multilevel analysis; Math achievement

Indexed keywords

EID: 68149156085     PISSN: 09243453     EISSN: 17445124     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09243450802605704     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. American Institutes for Research, & Cohen, J. (2006). AM Statistical Software Beta (Version 0.06.03) [Computer software]. Washington, DC: Author.
2. Betts, J.R., & Shkolnik, J.L. (2000). The effects of ability grouping on student achievement and resource allocation in secondary schools. Economics of Education Review, 19, 1-15.
3. Boaler, J. (1997). Experiencing school mathematics. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
4. Burris, C.C., Heubert, J.P., & Levin, H.M. (2006). Accelerating mathematics achievement using heterogeneous grouping. American Educational Research Journal, 43(1), 105-136.
5. Chang, M., & Singh, K. (2006). Is all-day kindergarten better? Evidence from ECLS data. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Tech.
6. Crosnoe, R. (2005). Double disadvantage or signs of resilience? The elementary school contexts of children from Mexican immigrant families. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 269-303.
7. Crosnoe, R. (2006). Health and the education of children from racial/ethnic minority and immigrant families. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 47(1), 77-93.
8. Crosnoe, R., Lopez-Gonzalez, L., & Muller, C. (2004). Immigration from Mexico into the math/science pipeline in American education. Social Science Quarterly (Blackwell Publishing Limited), 85(5), 1208-1226.
9. Gamoran, A. (1986). Instructional and institutional effects of ability grouping. Sociology of Education, 59, 185-198.
10. Gauman, A., & Behrand, S.M. (1987). The effects of stratification in secondary schools: Synthesis of survey and ethnographic research. Review of Educational Research, 57(4), 415-435.
11. Hambleton, R.K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, J.H. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12. Heck, R.H., & Thomas, S.L. (2000). An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Hoffer, T.B. (1992). Middle school ability grouping and student achievement in science and mathematics. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(3), 205-227.
14. Hopkins, K.D., Stanley, J.C., & Hopkins, B.R. (1990). Educational and psychological measurement and evaluation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15. Hox, J.J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Kulik, J.A., & Kulik, C.C. (1992). Meta-analytic findings on grouping programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 73-77.
17. Kreft, I., & De Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Leonard, J. (2001). How group composition influenced the achievement of sixth-grade mathematics students. Mathematical Thinking & Learning, 3(2/3), 175-200.
19. Lou, Y., Abrami, P.C., Spence, J.C., Poulsen, C., Chambers, B., & d'Apollonia, S. (1996). Within-class grouping: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 423-458.
20. Marks, G.N. (2005). Accounting for immigrant non-immigrant differences in reading and mathematics in twenty countries. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28(5), 925-946.
21. McCoach, D.B., O'Connell, A.A., & Levitt, H. (2006). Ability grouping across kindergarten using an early childhood longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 339- 346.
22. McDonald, R.P. (1999). Test theory. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Oakes, J. (1990). Multiplying inequalities: The effects of race, social class, and tracking on opportunities to learn mathematics and science. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
24. O'Neil, J. (1992). On tracking and individual differences: A conversation with Jeannie Oakes. Educational Leadership, 50(2), 18-21.
25. Portes, P. (1999). Social and psychological factors in the academic achievement of children of immigrants: A cultural history puzzle. American Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 489-507.
26. Raudenbush, S.W., & Bryk, A.S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage.
27. Rees, D.I., Brewer, D.J., & Argys, L.M. (2000). How should we measure the effect of ability grouping on student performance? Economics of Education Review, 19, 17-20.
28. Saleh, M., Lazonder, A.W., & Jong, T.D. (2005). Effects of within-class ability grouping on social interaction, achievement, and motivation. Instructional Science, 33, 105-119.
29. Schmid, C.L. (2001). Educational achievement, language-minority students, and the new second generation. Sociology of Education, Extra Issue, 71-87.
30. Schumm, J.S., Moody, S.W., & Vaughn, S. (2000). Grouping for reading instruction: Does one size fit all? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(5), 477-488.
31. Secada, W.G. (1992). Race, ethnicity, social class, language, and achievement in mathematics. In D.A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 623-659). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
32. Singer, J.D., & Willett, J.B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford Press.
33. Slavin, R.E. (1987). Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 57(3), 293-336.
34. Tach, L.M., & Farkas, G. (2006). Learning-related behaviors, cognitive skills, and ability grouping when schooling begins. Social Science Research, 35(4), 1048-1079.
35. Tourangeau, K., Nord, C., Le, T., Pollack, J.M., Atkins-Burnett, S., & Hausken, E.G. (2006). Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 1998-99 (ECLS-K): Combined user's manual for the ECLS-K fifth-grade data files and electronic codebooks. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics & U.S. Department of Education Institute of Education Sciences.
36. Vanderhart, P.G. (2006). Why do some schools group by ability? American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 65(2), 435-462.
37. Webb, J.M., Diana, E.M., Luft, P., Brooks, E.W., & Brennan, E.L. (1997). Influence of pedagogical expertise and feedback on assessing student comprehension from nonverbal behavior. Journal of Educational Research, 89(2), 89-97.