Grouping for reading instruction: Does one size fit all?

Journal of Learning Disabilities

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 477-488

  Schumm, Jeanne Shay ^a   Moody, Sally W ^a   Vaughn, Sharon ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; DYSLEXIA; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PERCEPTION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; TEACHING;

ATTITUDE; CHILD; DYSLEXIA; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; PERCEPTION; REMEDIAL TEACHING; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 0008439176     PISSN: 14690047     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/002221940003300508     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Allington, R. (1980). Teacher interruption behaviors during primary-grade oral reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 371-377.
2. Allington, R., Guice, S., Michelson, N., Baker, K., & Li, S. (1996). Literature-based curricula in high poverty schools. In M. F. Graves, P. van den broek, & B. M. Taylor (Eds.), The first R: Every child's right to read (pp. 73-95). Newark, NJ: International Reading Association.
3. Anderson, R. C., Hiebert, E. H., Scott, J. A., & Wilkinson, I. A. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers: The report of the commission of reading. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
4. Barr, R. (1989). The social organization of literacy instruction. In S. McCormick & J. Zutell (Eds.), Cognitive and social perspectives for literacy research and instruction (pp. 19-33). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
5. Barr, R., & Dreeben, R. (1991). What research says about grouping in the past and present and what it suggests about the future. In M. Radencich & L. McKay (Eds.), Flexible grouping for literacy in the elementary grades (pp. 1-24) Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
6. Corno, L., & Snow, R. E. (1986). Adapting teaching to individual differences among learners. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. (3rd ed., pp. 605-629). New York: Macmillan.
7. Elbaum, B. E., Schumm, J. S., & Vaughn, S. (1997). Urban middle-elementary students' perceptions of grouping formats for reading instruction. Elementary School Journal, 97, 475-500.
8. Flood, J., Lapp, D., Flood, S., & Nagel, G. (1992). Am I allowed to group? Using flexible patterns for effective instruction. The Reading Teacher, 45, 608-616.
9. Floyd, C. (1954). Meeting children's reading needs in the middle grades: A preliminary report. Elementary School Journal, 55, 99-103.
10. Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (1994). Looking in classrooms (6th ed.). New York: Harper-Collins.
11. Hallinan, M. T., & Sorenson, A. B. (1985). Ability grouping and student friendships. American Educational Research Journal, 22, 485-499.
12. Hiebert, E. H. (1983). An examination of ability grouping for reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 231-255.
13. Johnston, P., & Allington, R. (1991). Remediation. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 984-1012). New York: Longman.
14. Kaufman, A., & Kaufman, N. (1985). Kaufman test of educational achievement. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
15. Kulik, C. C., & Kulik, J. A. (1984, August). Effects of ability grouping on elementary school pupils: A meta-analysis. Paper presented at the 92nd annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED255 329)
16. Madden, R., Gardner, E. F., & Collins, C. S. (1982). Stanford achievement test. Cleveland, OH: Psychological Corp.
17. McIntosh, R., Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., Haager, D., & Lee, O. (1993). Observations of students with learning disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 60, 249-261.
18. McKenna, M. C., & Kear, D. J. (1990). Measuring attitude toward reading: A new tool for teachers. The Reading Teacher, 43, 626-639.
19. McKenna, M. C., Stratton, B. D., Grindler, M. C., & Jenkins, S. (1995). Differential effects of whole language and traditional instruction on reading attitudes. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27, 19-44.
20. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Noland, T. K. (1986). The effects of ability grouping: A meta-analysis of research findings. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder.
22. Oakes, J., Gamoran, A., & Page, R. N. (1992). Curriculum differentiation: Opportunities, outcomes, and meanings. In P. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 570-608). New York: Macmillan.
23. Otto, W. R., Wolf, A., & Eldridge, R. G. (1984). Managing instruction. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 799-828). New York: Longman.
24. Piers, E. V. (1984). The Piers-Harris children's self-concept scale: Revised manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
25. Schumm, J. S., & Vaughn, S. (1992). Planning for mainstreamed special education students. Exceptionality, 3, 81-90.
26. Schumm, J. S., Vaughn, S., & Elbaum, B. (1996). Teachers' perceptions of grouping practices for reading instruction. In D. J. Leu, C. K. Kinzer, & K. A. Hinchman (Eds.), Literacies for the 21st century: Research and practice (pp. 543-551). Chicago: The National Reading Conference.
27. Slavin, R. E. (1987). Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 57, 293-336.
28. Will, M. C. (1986). Educating children with learning problems: A shared responsibility. Exceptional Children, 52, 11-16.
29. Yin, R. K. (1991). Case study research: Design and methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
30. Zolotow, C., & McPhail, D. (1998). Hooked on phonics. San Francisco: Gateway Learning Corp.