Empirical tests of metacommunity theory using an isolation gradient

Ecological Monographs

Volumn 79, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 485-501

  Driscoll, Don A ^a   Lindenmayer, David B ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Birds; Ecological theory; Habitat fragmentation; Isolation; Lizards; Mass effects; Metacommunity; Neutral; Patch dynamic; Reptiles; Southeastern Australia; Species sorting

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL LAND; BIRD; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; COMMUNITY RESPONSE; DISPERSAL; ECOLOGICAL THEORY; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; ENDANGERED SPECIES; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; PATCH DYNAMICS; REPTILE;

AVES; REPTILIA; SQUAMATA;

EID: 68149128561     PISSN: 00129615     EISSN: 15577015     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/08-1114.1     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. Alonso, D., R. S. Etienne, and A. J. McKane. 2006. The merits of neutral theory. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21:451-457.
2. Andren, H. 1994. Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71:355-366.
3. Bascompte, J., and R. V. Sole. 1998. Effects of habitat destruction in a prey-predator metapopulation model. Journal of Theoretical Biology 195:383-393.
4. Bell, G. 2001. Ecology: neutral macroecology. Science 293: 2413-2418.
5. Bell, G., M. J. Lechowicz, and M. J. Waterway. 2006. The comparative evidence relating to functional and neutral interpretations of biological communities. Ecology 87:1378-1386.
6. Benjamini, Y., and Y. Hochberg. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate - a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 57:289-300.
7. Bloch, C. P., C. L. Higgins, and M. R. Willig. 2007. Effects of large-scale disturbance on metacommunity structure of terrestrial gastropods: temporal trends in nestedness. Oikos 116:395-406.
8. Bonte, D., L. Baert, L. Lens, and J. P. Maelfait. 2004. Effects of aerial dispersal, habitat specialization, and landscape structure on spider distribution across fragmented grey dunes. Ecography 27:343-349.
9. Bray, J. R., and J. T. Curtis. 1957. An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecological Monographs 27:325-349.
10. Chase, J. M., P. Amarasekare, K. Cottenie, A. Gonzalez, R. D. Holt, M. Holyoak, M. F. Hoopes, M. A. Leibold, M. Loreau, N. M. Mouquet, J. B. Shurin, and D. Tilman. 2005. Competing theories for competitive metacommunities. Pages 335-354 in M. Holyoak, M. A. Leibold, and R. D. Holt, editors. Metacommunities. Spatial dynamics and ecological communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
11. Chave, J. 2004. Neutral theory and community ecology. Ecology Letters 7:241-253.
12. Chave, J., H. C. Muller-Landau, and S. A. Levin. 2002. Comparing classical community models: theoretical consequences for patterns of diversity. American Naturalist 159:1-23.
13. Chevan, A., and M. Sutherland. 1991. Hierarchical partitioning. American Statistician 45:90-96.
14. Cottenie, K. 2005. Integrating environmental and spatial processes in ecological community dynamics. Ecology Letters 8:1175-1182.
15. Cottenie, K., E. Michels, N. Nuytten, and L. De Meester. 2003. Zooplankton metacommunity structure: regional vs. local processes in highly interconnected ponds. Ecology 84:991-1000.
16. Cronin, J. T. 2004. Host-parasitoid extinction and colonization in a fragmented prairie landscape. Oecologia 139:503-514.
17. Cronin, J. T., and J. D. Reeve. 2005. Host-parasitoid spatial ecology: a plea for a landscape-level synthesis. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 272:2225-2235.
18. Cunningham, R. B., D. B. Lindenmayer, M. Crane, D. Michael, and C. MacGregor. 2007. Reptile and arboreal marsupial response to replanted vegetation in agricultural landscapes. Ecological Applications 17:609-619.
19. Cunningham, R. B., D. B. Lindenmayer, M. Crane, D. Michael, C. McGregor, R. Montague-Drake, and J. Fischer. 2008. The combined effects of remnant vegetation and tree planting on farmland birds. Conservation Biology 22:742-752.
20. Cunningham, R. B., D. B. Lindenmayer, H. A. Nix, and B. D. Lindenmayr. 1999. Quantifying observer heterogeneity in bird counts. Australian Journal of Ecology 24:270-277.
21. Davies, K. F., B. A. Melbourne, and C. R. Margules. 2001. Effects of within- and between-patch processes on community dynamics in a fragmentation experiment. Ecology 82: 1830-1846.
22. Debinski, D. M., and R. D. Holt. 2000. A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. Conservation Biology 14:342-355.
23. Driscoll, D. A. 2007. How to find a metapopulation. Canadian Journal of Zoology 85:1031-1048.
24. Driscoll, D. A. 2008. The frequency of metapopulations, metacommunities and nestedness in a fragmented landscape. Oikos 117:297-309.
25. Ellis, A. M., L. P. Lounibos, and M. Holyoak. 2006. Evaluating the long-term metacommunity dynamics of tree hole mosquitoes. Ecology 87:2582-2590.
26. Ernst, R., and M. O. Rodel. 2005. Anthropogenically induced changes of predictability in tropical anuran assemblages. Ecology 86:3111-3118.
27. Fahrig, L. 1998. When does fragmentation of breeding habitat affect population survival? Ecological Modelling 105:273-292.
28. Field, S. A., A. J. Tyre, and H. P. Possingham. 2002. Estimating bird species richness: How should repeat surveys be organized in time? Austral Ecology 27:624-629.
29. Fischer, J., D. B. Lindenmayer, S. P. Blomberg, R. MontagueDrake, A. Felton, and J. A. Stein. 2007. Functional richness and relative resilience of bird communities in regions with different land use intensities. Ecosystems 10:964-974.
30. Flather, C. H., and M. Bevers. 2002. Patchy reaction-diffusion and population abundance: the relative importance of habitat amount and arrangement. American Naturalist 159:40-56.
31. Foppen, R. P. B., J. P. Chardon, and W. Liefveld. 2000. Understanding the role of sink patches in source-sink metapopulations: Reed Warbler in an agricultural landscape. Conservation Biology 14:1881-1892.
32. Gibbs, J. P. 1998. Distribution of woodland amphibians along a forest fragmentation gradient. Landscape Ecology 13:263-268.
33. Gilbert, B., W. F. Laurance, E. G. Leigh, and H. E. M. Nascimento. 2006. Can neutral theory predict the responses of Amazonian tree communities to forest fragmentation? American Naturalist 168:304-317.
34. Gilbert, B., and M. J. Lechowicz. 2004. Neutrality, niches, and dispersal in a temperate forest understory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 101:7651-7656.
35. Gilpin, M. E., and I. Hanski. 1991. Metapopulation dynamics. Empirical and theoretical investigations. Academic Press, New York, New York, USA.
36. Guelat, J., J. Jaquiery, L. Berset-Brandli, E. Pellegrini, R. Moresi, T. Broquet, A. H. Hirzel, and N. Perrin. 2008. Mass effects mediate coexistence in competing shrews. Ecology 89: 2033-2042.
37. Hanski, I. 1998. Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 396:41-49.
38. Hanski, I., and D. Simberloff. 1997. The metapopulation approach, its history, conceptual domain and application to conservation. Pages 5-26 in I. Hanski and M. E. Gilpin, editors. Metapopulation biology. Ecology, genetics and evolution. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
39. HANZAB. 2006. Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic birds, volumes 1-7, 1990-2006. Oxford University Press, Melbourne, Australia.
40. Harrison, S. 1994. Metapopulations and conservation. Pages 111-128 in P. J. Edwards, R. May, and N. R. Webb, editors. Large scale ecology and conservation biology. The 35th Symposium of the British Ecological Society with the Society for Conservation Biology. University of South Hampton, 1993. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK.
41. Holyoak, M., M. A. Leibold, and R. D. Holt. 2005a. Metacommunities. Spatial dynamics and ecological communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
42. Holyoak, M., M. A. Leibold, N. M. Mouquet, R. D. Holt, and M. F. Hoopes. 2005b. Metacommunities: a framework for large-scale community ecology. Pages 1-31 in M. Holyoak, M. A. Leibold, and R. D. Holt, editors. Metacommunities. Spatial dynamics and ecological communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
43. Holyoak, M., and M. Loreau. 2006. Reconciling empirical ecology with neutral community models. Ecology 87:1370-1377.
44. Hoopes, M. F., R. D. Holt, and M. Holyoak. 2005. The effects of spatial processes on two species interactions. Pages 35-67 in M. Holyoak, M. A. Leibold, and R. D. Holt, editors. Metacommunities. Spatial dynamics and ecological communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
45. Hubbell, S. P. 2001. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
46. Hubbell, S. P., and J. K. Lake. 2003. The neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography, and beyond. Pages 45-63 in T. M. Blackburn and K. J. Gaston, editors. Macroecology: concepts and consequences. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK.
47. Hutchinson, G. E. 1957. Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium of Quantitative Biology 22:415-427.
48. Huxel, G. R., and A. Hastings. 1998. Population size dependence, competitive coexistence and habitat destruction. Journal of Animal Ecology 67:446-453.
49. Lei, G., and I. Hanski. 1997. Metapopulation structure of Cotesia melitaearum, a specialist parasitoid of the butterfly Melitaea cinxia. Oikos 78:91-100.
50. Leibold, M. A. 1995. The niche concept revisited: mechanistic models and community context. Ecology 76:1371-1382.
51. Leibold, M. A., M. Holyoak, N. Mouquet, P. Amarasekare, J. M. Chase, M. F. Hoopes, R. D. Holt, J. B. Shurin, R. Law, D. Tilman, M. Loreau, and A. Gonzalez. 2004. The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecology Letters 7:601-613.
52. Lindenmayer, D. B., R. B. Cunningham, C. F. Donnelly, H. Nix, and B. D. Lindenmayer. 2002. Effects of forest fragmentation on bird assemblages in a novel landscape context. Ecological Monographs 72:1-18.
53. Lockwood, J. L., and J. J. Gilroy. 2004. The portability of foodweb dynamics: reassembling an Australian eucalypt-psyllid-bird association within California. Global Ecology and Biogeography 13:445-450.
54. MacNally, R. 1996. Hierarchical partitioning as an interpretative tool in multivariate inference. Australian Journal of Ecology 21:224-228.
55. MacNally, R., and C. A. R. Timewell. 2005. Resource availability controls bird-assemblage composition through interspecific aggression. Auk 122:1097-1111.
56. Manly, B. F. J. 1994. Multivariate statistical methods. Second edition. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
57. McCarthy, M. A., D. B. Lindenmayer, and M. Drechsler. 1997. Extinction debts and risks faced by abundant species. Conservation Biology 11:221-226.
58. McCullagh, P., and J. A. Nelder. 1989. Generalized linear models. Second edition. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
59. McGill, B. J., B. A. Maurer, and M. D. Weiser. 2006. Empirical evaluation of neutral theory. Ecology 87:1411-1423.
60. Meynard, C. N., and J. F. Quinn. 2008. Bird metacommunities in temperate South American forest: vegetation structure, area, and climate effects. Ecology 89:981-990.
61. Moilanen, A., and I. Hanski. 1995. Habitat destruction and coexistence of competitors in a spatially realistic metapopulation model. Journal of Animal Ecology 64:141-144.
62. Moilanen, A., and M. Nieminen. 2002. Simple connectivity measures in spatial ecology. Ecology 83:1131-1145.
63. Mouquet, N., and M. Loreau. 2003. Community patterns in source-sink metacommunities. American Naturalist 162: 544-557.
64. Muneepeerakul, R., E. Bertuzzo, H. Lynch, W. Fagan, A. Rinaldo, and I. Rodriguez-Iturbe. 2008. Neutral metacommunity models predict fish diversity patterns in MississippiMissouri basin. Nature 453:220-223.
65. Nee, S., and R. M. May. 1992. Dynamics of metapopulations: habitat destruction and competitive coexistence. Journal of Animal Ecology 61:37-40.
66. Oksanen, J., R. Kindt, P. Legendre, and R. B. O'Hara. 2007. vegan: community ecology package version 1.8-6. 〈http://cran.r-project.org/〉
67. Parris, K. M. 2006. Urban amphibian assemblages as metacommunities. Journal of Animal Ecology 75:757-764.
68. Parris, K. M., and D. B. Lindenmayer. 2004. Evidence that creation of a Pinus radiata plantation in south-eastern Australia has reduced habitat for frogs. Acta Oecologica 25:93-101.
69. Perlut, N. G., A. M. Strong, T. M. Donovan, and N. J. Buckley. 2008. Grassland songbird survival and recruitment in agricultural landscapes: Implications for source-sink demography. Ecology 89:1941-1952.
70. Pulliam, H. R. 1988. Sources, sinks and population regulation. American Naturalist 132:652-661.
71. Pyke, G. H., and H. F. Recher. 1983. Censusing Australian birds: a summary of procedures and a scheme for the standardization of data presentation and storage. Pages 55-63 in S. J. Davies, editor. Methods of censusing birds in Australia, proceedings of a symposium organised by the zoology section of the ANZAAS and the Western Australian Group of the Royal Australasian Ornithologists Union. Department of Conservation and Environment, Perth, Australia.
72. R Development Core Team. 2004. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 〈http://www.r-project.org〉
73. Radford, J. Q., A. F. Bennett, and G. J. Cheers. 2005. Landscape-level thresholds of habitat cover for woodland-dependent birds. Biological Conservation 124:317-337.
74. Richter-Boix, A., G. A. Llorente, and A. Montori. 2007. Structure and dynamics of an amphibian metacommunity in two regions. Journal of Animal Ecology 76:607-618.
75. Ryall, K. L., and L. Fahrig. 2006. Response of predators to loss and fragmentation of prey habitat: a review of theory. Ecology 87:1086-1093.
76. Schoener, T. W., D. A. Spiller, and J. B. Losos. 2001. Predators increase the risk of catastrophic extinction of prey populations. Nature 412:183-186.
77. Shmida, A., and S. Ellner. 1984. Coexistence of plant-species with similar niches. Vegetatio 58:29-55.
78. Soininen, J., M. Kokocinski, S. Estlander, J. Kotanen, and J. Heino. 2007. Neutrality, niches, and determinants of plankton metacommunity structure across boreal wetland ponds. Ecoscience 14:146-154.
79. Spiller, D. A., and T. W. Schoener. 1995. Long-term variation in the effect of lizards on spider density is linked to rainfall. Oecologia 103:133-139.
80. Storey, J. D. 2002. A direct approach to false discovery rates. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 64:479-498.
81. Storey, J. D., J. E. Taylor, and D. Siegmund. 2004. Strong control, conservative point estimation and simultaneous conservative consistency of false discovery rates: a unified approach. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 66:187-205.
82. Storey, J. D., and R. Tibshirani. 2003. Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 100:9440-9445.
83. Sutton, A. J., K. R. Abrams, D. R. Jones, T. A. Sheldon, and F. Song. 2000. Methods for meta-analysis in medical research. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
84. Swihart, R. K., Z. L. Feng, N. A. Slade, D. M. Mason, and T. M. Gehring. 2001. Effects of habitat destruction and resource supplementation in a predator-prey metapopulation model. Journal of Theoretical Biology 210:287-303.
85. Taylor, A. D. 1990. Metapopulations, dispersal, and predator prey dynamics: an overview. Ecology 71:429-433.
86. Thomas, C. D. 1994. Extinction, colonization and metapopulations: environmental tracking by rare species. Conservation Biology 8:373-378.
87. Thomas, C. D., M. C. Singer, and D. A. Boughton. 1996. Catastrophic extinction of population sources in a butterfly metapopulation. American Naturalist 148:957-975.
88. Thompson, R., and C. Townsend. 2006. A truce with neutral theory: local deterministic factors, species traits and dispersal limitation together determine patterns of diversity in stream invertebrates. Journal of Animal Ecology 75:476-484.
89. Tilman, D., R. M. May, C. L. Lehman, and M. A. Nowak. 1994. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371:65-66.
90. Tremlova, K., and Z. Munzbergova. 2007. Importance of species traits for species distribution in fragmented landscapes. Ecology 88:965-977.
91. Urban, M. C. 2004. Disturbance heterogeneity determines freshwater metacommunity structure. Ecology 85:2971-2978.
92. Van De Meutter, F., L. De Meester, and R. Stoks. 2007. Metacommunity structure of pond macro invertebrates: effects of dispersal mode and generation time. Ecology 88: 1687-1695.
93. Vandvik, V., and D. E. Goldberg. 2006. Sources of diversity in a grassland metacommunity: quantifying the contribution of dispersal to species richness. American Naturalist 168:157-167.
94. Vanschoenwinkel, B., C. De Vries, M. Seaman, and L. Brendonck. 2007. The role of metacommunity processes in shaping invertebrate rock pool communities along a dispersal gradient. Oikos 116:1255-1266
95. Venables, W. N., and B. D. Ripley. 2002. Modern applied statistics with S. Fourth edition. Springer, New York, New York, USA.
96. Wellborn, G. A., D. K. Skelly, and E. E. Werner. 1996. Mechanisms creating community structure across a freshwater habitat gradient. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 27:337-363.
97. Werth, S., H. H. Wagner, F. Gugerli, R. Holderegger, D. Csencsics, J. M. Kalwij, and C. Scheidegger. 2006. Quantifying dispersal and establishment limitation in a population of an epiphytic lichen. Ecology 87:2037-2046.
98. Young, A. G., A. H. D. Brown, and F. A. Zich. 1999. Genetic structure of fragmented populations of the endangered daisy Rutidosis leptorrhynchoides. Conservation Biology 13:256-265.