Stimulus dependence of the flash-lag effect

Vision Research

Volumn 47, Issue 22, 2007, Pages 2841-2854

  Cantor, Christopher R L ^a   Schor, Clifton M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Differential latency; Flash lag effect; Motion; Motion extrapolation; Position computation; Postdiction; Spatial; Temporal; Temporal impulse response

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTRAST; FLASH LAG EFFECT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MOTION; NORMAL HUMAN; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SPATIAL FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TIME; VELOCITY; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PROCEDURES; REACTION TIME; TIME PERCEPTION;

HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS; TIME PERCEPTION;

EID: 34548798569     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.06.023     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Baldo M.V.C., Kihara A.H., et al. Evidence for an attentional component of the perceptual misalignment between moving and flashing stimuli. Perception 31 1 (2002) 17-30
2. Baldo M.V.C., and Klein S.A. Extrapolation or attention shift. Nature 378 6557 (1995) 565-566
3. Baldo M.V.C., and Namba J. The attentional modulation of the flash-lag effect. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research 35 8 (2002) 969-972
4. Berry M.J., Brivanlou I.H., et al. Anticipation of moving stimuli by the retina. Nature 398 6725 (1999) 334-338
5. Brenner E., and Smeets J.B.J. Motion extrapolation is not responsible for the flash-lag effect. Vision Research 40 13 (2000) 1645-1648
6. Burr D.C. Acuity for apparent vernier offset. Vision Research 19 7 (1979) 835-837
7. Burr D.C., and Morrone M.C. Impulse-response functions for chromatic and achromatic stimuli. Journal of the Optical Society of America a-Optics Image Science and Vision 10 8 (1993) 1706-1713
8. Carney T., Silverstein D.A., et al. Vernier acuity during image rotation and translation-Visual performance limits. Vision Research 35 14 (1995) 1951-1964
9. Chappell M., and Hine T.J. The flash-lag effect does depend on events before the flash. Perception 31 (2002) 41 41
10. Chappell M., and Hine T.J. Events before the flash do influence the flash-lag magnitude. Vision Research 44 3 (2004) 235-239
11. Chung S.T.L., and Bedell H.E. Velocity dependence of vernier and letter acuity for band-pass filtered moving stimuli. Vision Research 43 6 (2003) 669-682
12. De Valois R.L., and Cottaris N.P. Inputs to directionally selective simple cells in macaque striate cortex. PNAS 95 24 (1998) 14488-14493
13. Eagleman D.M., and Sejnowski T.J. Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. Science 287 5460 (2000) 2036-2038
14. Fredericksen R.E., and Hess R.F. Temporal detection in human vision: Dependence on spatial frequency. Journal of the Optical Society of America a-Optics Image Science and Vision 16 11 (1999) 2601-2611
15. Fu Y.-X., Shen Y., et al. Motion-induced perceptual extrapolation of blurred visual targets. Journal of Neuroscience 21 20 (2001) 1-5 RC172
16. Georgeson M.A. Temporal properties of spatial contrast vision. Vision Research 27 5 (1987) 765-780
17. Kanai R., Sheth B.R., et al. Stopping the motion and sleuthing the flash-lag effect: Spatial uncertainty is the key to perceptual mislocalization. Vision Research 44 22 (2004) 2605-2619
18. Khurana B., and Nijhawan R. Extrapolation or attention shift reply. Nature 378 6557 (1995) 566 566
19. Klein S.A., and Levi D.M. Hyperacuity thresholds of 1 s-Theoretical predictions and empirical validation. Journal of the Optical Society of America a-Optics Image Science and Vision 2 7 (1985) 1170-1190
20. Kontsevich L.L., and Tyler C.W. Bayesian adaptive estimation of psychometric slope and threshold. Vision Research 39 16 (1999) 2729-2737
21. Krekelberg B., and Lappe M. Temporal recruitment along the trajectory of moving objects and the perception of position. Vision Research 39 16 (1999) 2669-2679
22. Krekelberg B., and Lappe M. A model of the perceived relative positions of moving objects based upon a slow averaging process. Vision Research 40 2 (2000) 201-215
23. Lappe M., and Krekelberg B. The position of moving objects. Perception 27 12 (1998) 1437-1449
24. Mackay D.M. Perceptual stability of a stroboscopically lit visual field containing self-luminous objects. Nature 181 4607 (1958) 507-508
25. Morrone M.C., and Burr D.C. Feature detection in human vision: A phase-dependent energy model. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 235 1280 (1988) 221-245
26. Nijhawan R. Motion extrapolation in catching. Nature 370 6487 (1994) 256-257
27. Ogmen H., Patel S.S., et al. Differential latencies and the dynamics of the position computation process for moving targets, assessed with the flash-lag effect. Vision Research 44 18 (2004) 2109-2128
28. Pantle A., and Turano K. Visual resolution of motion ambiguity with periodic luminance-domain and contrast-domain stimuli. Vision Research 32 11 (1992) 2093-2106
29. Patel S.S., Ogmen H., et al. Flash-Lag effect: Differential latency, not postdiction. Science 290 5494 (2000) 1051a
30. Purushothaman G., Patel S.S., et al. Moving ahead through differential visual latency. Nature 396 6710 (1998) 424 424
31. Ruttiger L., Lee B., et al. Transient cells can be neurometrically sustained: The positional accuracy or retinal signals to moving targets. Journal of Vision 2 3 (2002) 232-242
32. Watson A.B., and Nachmias J. Patterns of temporal interaction in the detection of gratings. Vision Research 17 8 (1977) 893-902
33. Westheimer G., and McKee S.P. Visual-acuity in presence of retinal-image motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America 65 7 (1975) 847-850
34. Whitney D. The influence of visual motion on perceived position. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 5 (2002) 211-216
35. Whitney D., Cavanagh P., et al. Temporal facilitation for moving stimuli is independent of changes in direction. Vision Research 40 28 (2000) 3829-3839
36. Whitney D., and Murakami I. Latency difference, not spatial extrapolation. Nature Neuroscience 1 8 (1998) 656-657
37. Whitney D., Murakami I., et al. Illusory spatial offset of a flash relative to a moving stimulus is caused by differential latencies for moving and flashed stimuli. Vision Research 40 2 (2000) 137-149
38. Williams J.M., and Lit A. Luminance-dependent visual latency for the hess effect, the pulfrich effect, and simple reaction-time. Vision Research 23 2 (1983) 171-179
39. Wilson J.A., and Anstis S.M. Visual delay as a function of luminance. American Journal of Psychology 82 3 (1969) 350-&
40. Zanker J.M., Quenzer T., et al. Perceptual deformation induced by visual motion. Naturwissenschaften 88 3 (2001) 129-132