Role of electrospun fibre diameter and corresponding specific surface area (SSA) on cell attachment

Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 269-279

  Chen, Ming ^a   Patra, Prabir K ^a,d   Lovett, Michael L ^b   Kaplan, David L ^b   Bhowmick, Sankha ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS DARTMOUTH   (United States)

^b Tufts University   (United States)

^c Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (United States)

^d RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Actin cytoskeleton organization; Cell attachment; Electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds; Tissue regeneration

Indexed keywords

BODY FLUIDS; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; CELLS; ELECTROSPINNING; FIBERS; NANOFIBERS; PROTEINS; SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY); SPECIFIC SURFACE AREA; TISSUE;

ACTIN CYTOSKELETON; ACTIN CYTOSKELETON ORGANIZATION; CELL ATTACHMENTS; CELL SPREADING; ELECTROSPUN NANOFIBROUS SCAFFOLD; ELECTROSPUN SCAFFOLDS; ELECTROSPUNS; FIBER DIAMETERS; NANOFIBROUS SCAFFOLDS; SERUM CONCENTRATION;

TISSUE REGENERATION;

F ACTIN; MOLECULAR SCAFFOLD; NANOFIBER; POLYCAPROLACTONE; POLYESTER;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL LABELING; CELL SPREADING; CELL SURFACE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTURE MEDIUM; CYTOSKELETON; FIBROBLAST; MATRIX ATTACHMENT REGION; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; TISSUE REGENERATION; ANIMAL; BLOOD; CELL STRAIN 3T3; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; KINETICS;

3T3 CELLS; ANIMALS; BLOOD; CELL ADHESION; KINETICS; MICE; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; POLYESTERS;

EID: 68049124968     PISSN: 19326254     EISSN: 19327005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/term.163     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Abramoff MD, Magelhaes PJ, Ram SJ. 2004; Image processing with ImageJ. Biophoton Int 11: 36-42.
2. Alberto-Rincon MC, Zorn TM, Abrahamsohn PA. 1989; Diameter increase of collagen fibrils of the mouse endometrium during decidualization. Am J Anat 186: 417-429.
3. Anselme K, Bigerelle M. 2006; Modelling approach in cell/material interactions studies. Biomaterials 27: 1187-1199.
4. Anselme K. 2000; Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials. Biomaterials 21: 667-681.
5. Benoit M, Gaub HE. 2002; Measuring cell adhesion forces with the atomic forcemicroscope at the molecular level. Cells Tissues Organs 172: 174-189.
6. Bhattarai SR, Bhattarai N, Yi HK, et al. 2004; Novel biodegradable electrospun membrane: scaffold for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 25: 2595-2602.
7. Chen CS, Mrksich M, Huang S, et al. 1997; Geometric control of cell life and death. Science 276: 1425-1428.
8. Chen M, Patra PK, Warner SB, et al. 2006; Optimization of electrospinning process parameters for tissue engineering scaffolds. Biophys Rev Lett 1: 189-214.
9. Chen M, Patra PK, Warner SB, et al. 2007; Role of fibre diameter in adhesion and proliferation of NIH 3T3 fibroblast on electrospun polycaprolactone scaffolds. Tissue Eng 13: 579-587.
10. Chen VJ, Ma PX. 2004; Nano-fibrous poly(L-lactic acid) scaffolds with interconnected spherical macropores. Biomaterials 25: 2065-2073.
11. Coussen F, Choquet D, Sheetz MP, et al. 2002; Trimers of the fibronectin cell adhesion domain localize to actin filament bundles and undergo rearward translocation. J Cell Sci 115: 2581-2590.
12. Danen E, Lafrenie R, Miyamoto S, et al. 1998; Integrin signaling: cytoskeletal complexes, MAP kinase activation and regulation of gene expression. Cell Adhes Commun 6: 217-224.
13. Defilippi P, Olivo C, Venturino M, et al. 1999; Actin cytoskeleton organization in response to integrin-mediated adhesion. Microsc Res Tech 47: 67-78.
14. du Laney TV, Cherry RS, Coppinger JA, et al. 1992; Altered distribution of mitochondria and actin fibres in 3T3 cells cultured on microcarriers. Biotechnol Prog 8: 572-575.
15. Elsdale T, Bard J. 1972; Collagen substrata for studies on cell behavior. J Cell Biol 54: 626-637.
16. Garcia AJ, Boettiger D. 1999; Integrin-fibronectin interactions at the cell-material interface: initial integrin binding and signaling. Biomaterials 20: 2427-2433.
17. Giancotti FG, Ruoslahti E. 1999; Integrin signaling. Science 285: 1028-1032.
18. Glass JR, Dickerson KT, Stecker K, et al. 1996; Characterization of a hyaluronic acid-Arg-Gly-Asp peptide cell attachment matrix. Biomaterials 17: 1101-1108.
19. Grinnell F, Feld MK. 1979; Initial adhesion of human fibroblasts in serum-free medium: possible role of secreted fibronectin. Cell 17: 117-129.
20. Grinnell F. 1978; Cellular adhesiveness and extracellular substrata. Int Rev Cytol 53: 65-144.
21. Grzesik W. 1997; Integrins and bone-cell adhesion and beyond. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warszana) 45: 271-275.
22. Hynes RO. 1976; Cell surface proteins and malignant transformation Biochim Biophys Acta 458: 73-107.
23. Jameela SR, Suma N, Jayakrishnan A. 1997; Protein release from poly(ε-caprolactone) microspheres prepared by melt encapsulation and solvent evaporation techniques: a comparative study. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 8: 457-466.
24. Kadler K. 2004; Matrix loading: assembly of extracellular matrix collagen fibrils during embryogenesis. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today 72: 1-11.
25. Lambert KJ, Brich JR. 1985; Animal Cell Biotechnology. Academic Press: New York.
26. LeBaron RG, Athanasiou KA. 2000; Extracellular matrix cell adhesion peptides: functional applications in orthopedic materials. Tissue Eng 6: 85-103.
27. Lee KY, Mooney DJ. 2001; Hydrogels for tissue engineering. Chem Rev 101: 1869-1879.
28. Li WJ, Laurencin CT, Caterson EJ, et al. 2002; Electrospun nanofibrous structure: a novel scaffold for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res 60: 613-621.
29. Matthews J, WnekG, SimpsonD, et al. 2002; Electrospinning of collagen nanofibres. Biomacromolecules 3: 232-238.
30. Middleton JC, Tipton AJ. 1998; Synthetic biodegradable polymers as medical devices. Med Plastics Biomater Mag: 30.
31. Mo X, Xu C, Kotaki M, et al. 2004; Electrospun P(LLA-CL) nanofibre: a biomimetic extracellular matrix for smooth muscle cell and endothelial cell proliferation. Biomaterials 25: 1883-1890.
32. Pitt CG. 1990; Poly(ε-Caprolactone) and Its Co-polymers. Marcel Decker: New York; 71-120.
33. Ramakrishna S, Fujihara K, Teo WE, et al. 2006; Electrospun nanofibres: solving global issues. Materials Today 9: 40-50.
34. Reneker D, Chun I. 1996; Nanometre diameter fibres of polymer, produced by electrospinning. Nanotechnology 7: 216-223.
35. Shin H, Jo S, Mikos AG. 2003; Biomimetic materials for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 24: 4353-4364.
36. Shin H. 2007; Fabrication methods of an engineered microenvironment for analysis of cell-biomaterial interactions. Biomaterials 28: 126-133.
37. Thapa A, Webster TJ, Haberstroh KM. 2003; Polymers with nanodimensional surface features enhance bladder smooth muscle cell adhesion. J Biomed Mater Res A 67: 1374-1383.
38. Vasiliev JM. 1985; Spreading of non-transformed and transformed cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 780: 21-65.
39. Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH, et al. 2000; Specific proteins mediate enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res 51: 475-483.
40. Webster TJ, Schadler LS, Siegel RW, et al. 2001; Mechanisms of enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase alumina involve vitronectin. Tissue Eng 7: 291-301.
41. Weston JA, Hendricks KL. 1972; Reversible transformation by urea of contact-inhibited fibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 69: 3727-3731.
42. Wojcikiewicz EP, Zhang X, Moy VT. 2004; Force and compliance measurements on living cells using atomic force microscopy (AFM). Biol Proced Online 6: 1-9.
43. Wu CC, Su HW, Lee CC, et al. 2005; Quantitative measurement of changes in adhesion force involving focal adhesion kinase during cell attachment, spread, and migration. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 329: 256-265.
44. Yamada KM, Olden K. 1978; Fibronectins - adhesive glycoproteins of cell surface and blood. Nature 275: 179-184.
45. Yoshimoto H, Shin Y, Terai H, et al. 2003; A biodegradable nanofibre scaffold by electrospinning and its potential for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 24: 2077-2082.
46. Zigmond S. 1996; Signal tranduction and actin filament organization. Curr Opin Cell Biol 8: 66-73.