Evaluation of dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus;Evaluierung der dynamischen konturtonometrie bei keratokonus

Ophthalmologe

Volumn 106, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 531-535

  Schadle N ^a   Unterlauft, J D ^a   Klink, T ^a   Geerling, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Corneal thickness; Dynamic contour tonometry; Goldmann applanation tonometry; Intraocular pressure; Keratoconus

Indexed keywords

EID: 67949111022     PISSN: 0941293X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00347-008-1812-1     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Barreto J Jr, Babic M, Murad R (2006) Dynamic contour tonometry and goldman applanation tonometry in eyes with keratoconus. Clinics 61:511-514
2. Böhm A, Kohlhaas M, Lerche RC et al. (1997) Measuring intraocular pressure in keratoconus. Effect of the changed biomechanics. Ophthalmologe 94:771-774
3. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement beween two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 307-310
4. Bland JM, Altman DG (1995) Comparing two methods of clinical measurement. A personal history. Int J Epidemiol 24:7-14
5. Doyle A, Lachkar Y (1995) Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry over a wide range of central corneal thickness. J Glaucoma 14:288-292
6. Duba I, Wirthlin AC (2004) Dynamic contour tonometry for post-LASIK intraocular pressure measurements. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 221:347-350
7. Goldmann H, Schmidt T (1957) Über Applanationstonometrie. Ophthalmologica 134:221-242
8. Herndon LW, Weizer JS, Stinnett SS (2004) Central corneal thickness as a risk factor for advanced glaucoma damage. Arch Ophthalmol 122:17-21
9. Kanngiesser H, Kniestedt C (2005)Tonometrie im Wandel. Ophthalmologe 102:849-855
10. Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA (2004) Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:3118-3121
11. Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA (2003) Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:3790-3794
12. Kniestedt C, Lin S, Choe J et al. (2005) Clinical comparison of contour and applanation tonometry and their relationship to pachymetry. Arch Ophthalmol 123:1532-1537
13. Kniestedt C, Lin S, Choe J et al. (2006) Correlation between intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness, stage of glaucoma, and demographic patient data. Glaucoma 15:91-97
14. Kniestedt C, Nee M, Stamper RL (2005) Accuracy of dynamic contour tonometry compared with applanation tonometry in human cadaver eyes of different hydration states. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 243:763-767
15. Kniestedt C, Nee M, Stamper RL (2004) Dynamic contour tonometry. A comparative study on human cadaver eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 122:1287-1293
16. Kohlhaas M, Boehm AG, Spoerl E et al. (2006) Effect of central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and axial length on applanation tonometry. Arch Ophthalmol 124:471-476
17. Moses RA (1958) Goldmann applanation tonometer. Am J Ophthalmol 46:865-869
18. Ozbek Z, Cohen EJ, Hammersmith KM et al. (2006) Dynamic contour tonometry. A new way to assess intraocular pressure in ectatic corneas. Cornea 25:890-894
19. Pache M, Wilmsmeyer S, Lautebach S et al. (2004) Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 243:763-767
20. Schneider E, Grehn F (2006) Intraocular pressure measurement - comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma 15:2-6
21. Schneider E, Kanngiesser HE, Kniestedt C (2006) Dynamic contour tonometry. In: Grehn F, Stamper R (eds) Glaucoma. Springer, Heidelberg New York, pp 47-63
22. Stodtmeister R (1998) Applanation tonometry an correction according to corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 76:319-324
23. Viestenz A, Langenbucher A, Seitz B,Viestenz A (2006) Evaluierung der dynamischen Konturtonometrie nach perforierender Keratoplastik. Ophthalmologe 103:773-776