-
1
-
-
0037075009
-
The counting house
-
Adam, D. (2002). The counting house. Nature, 415: 726-729.
-
(2002)
Nature
, vol.415
, pp. 726-729
-
-
Adam, D.1
-
2
-
-
18444416337
-
-
Albert, D. M., Liesegang, T. J., Schachat, A. P. (2005). Meeting our ethical obligations in medical publishing: responsibilities of editors, authors, and readers of peer-reviewed journals. Arch Ophthalmol, 123: 684-686.
-
Albert, D. M., Liesegang, T. J., Schachat, A. P. (2005). Meeting our ethical obligations in medical publishing: responsibilities of editors, authors, and readers of peer-reviewed journals. Arch Ophthalmol, 123: 684-686.
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
1542286682
-
Emerging ethical issues in instructions to authors of high-impact biomedical journals
-
Atlas, M. C. (2003). Emerging ethical issues in instructions to authors of high-impact biomedical journals. J Med Libr Assoc, 91: 442-449.
-
(2003)
J Med Libr Assoc
, vol.91
, pp. 442-449
-
-
Atlas, M.C.1
-
4
-
-
33947509941
-
How impact factors changed medical publishing-and science
-
Brown, H. (2007). How impact factors changed medical publishing-and science. BMJ, 334: 561-564.
-
(2007)
BMJ
, vol.334
, pp. 561-564
-
-
Brown, H.1
-
5
-
-
0037024313
-
Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals
-
Callaham, M., Wears, R. L., Weber, E. (2002). Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals. JAMA, 287: 2847-2850.
-
(2002)
JAMA
, vol.287
, pp. 2847-2850
-
-
Callaham, M.1
Wears, R.L.2
Weber, E.3
-
6
-
-
85127128113
-
-
Chew, M., Villanueva, E. V., Van Der Weyden, M. B. Life and times of the impact factor: retrospective analysis of trends for seven medical journals (1994-2005) and their Editors' views. J R Soc Med, 100: 142-150.
-
Chew, M., Villanueva, E. V., Van Der Weyden, M. B. Life and times of the impact factor: retrospective analysis of trends for seven medical journals (1994-2005) and their Editors' views. J R Soc Med, 100: 142-150.
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
0041864044
-
A report card for journals
-
DeMaria, A. N. (2003). A report card for journals. J Am Coll Cardiol, 42: 952-953.
-
(2003)
J Am Coll Cardiol
, vol.42
, pp. 952-953
-
-
DeMaria, A.N.1
-
8
-
-
0033957894
-
Self-citations in six anaesthesia journals and their significance in determining the impact factor
-
Fassoulaki, A., Paraskeva, A., Papilas, K., Karabinis, G. (2000). Self-citations in six anaesthesia journals and their significance in determining the impact factor. Br J Anaesth, 84: 266-269.
-
(2000)
Br J Anaesth
, vol.84
, pp. 266-269
-
-
Fassoulaki, A.1
Paraskeva, A.2
Papilas, K.3
Karabinis, G.4
-
9
-
-
3042810096
-
Author self-citation in the diabetes literature
-
Gami, A. S., Montori, V. M., Wilczynski, N. L., Haynes, R. B. (2004). Author self-citation in the diabetes literature. CMAJ, 170: 1925-1927.
-
(2004)
CMAJ
, vol.170
, pp. 1925-1927
-
-
Gami, A.S.1
Montori, V.M.2
Wilczynski, N.L.3
Haynes, R.B.4
-
10
-
-
29944438252
-
The history and meaning of the journal impact factor
-
Garfield, E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA, 295: 90-93.
-
(2006)
JAMA
, vol.295
, pp. 90-93
-
-
Garfield, E.1
-
11
-
-
40249083354
-
Calculating impact factor: How bibliographical classification of journal items affects the impact factor of large and small journals
-
Golubic, R., Rudes, M., Kovacic, N., Marusic, M., Marusic, A. (2008). Calculating impact factor: How bibliographical classification of journal items affects the impact factor of large and small journals. Sci Eng Ethics, 14: 41-49.
-
(2008)
Sci Eng Ethics
, vol.14
, pp. 41-49
-
-
Golubic, R.1
Rudes, M.2
Kovacic, N.3
Marusic, M.4
Marusic, A.5
-
12
-
-
0036175645
-
-
Hemmingsson, A., Mygind, T., Skjennald, A., Edgren, J. (2002). Manipulation of impact factors by editors of scientific journals. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 178: 767.
-
Hemmingsson, A., Mygind, T., Skjennald, A., Edgren, J. (2002). Manipulation of impact factors by editors of scientific journals. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 178: 767.
-
-
-
-
13
-
-
37649007281
-
Does the H index have predictive power?
-
Hirsch, J. E. (2007). Does the H index have predictive power? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 104: 19193-19198.
-
(2007)
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
, vol.104
, pp. 19193-19198
-
-
Hirsch, J.E.1
-
14
-
-
33947540043
-
Should we ditch impact factors?
-
Hobbs, R. (2007). Should we ditch impact factors? BMJ, 334: 569.
-
(2007)
BMJ
, vol.334
, pp. 569
-
-
Hobbs, R.1
-
15
-
-
0037322737
-
Self-citation and self-reference: Credibility and promotion in academic publication
-
Hyland, K. (2003). Self-citation and self-reference: credibility and promotion in academic publication. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol, 54: 251-259.
-
(2003)
J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol
, vol.54
, pp. 251-259
-
-
Hyland, K.1
-
16
-
-
22144431885
-
Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research
-
Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research. JAMA, 294: 218-228.
-
(2005)
JAMA
, vol.294
, pp. 218-228
-
-
Ioannidis, J.P.1
-
17
-
-
0037308562
-
Quality of impact factors of general medical journals
-
Joseph, K. S. (2003). Quality of impact factors of general medical journals. BMJ, 326: 283.
-
(2003)
BMJ
, vol.326
, pp. 283
-
-
Joseph, K.S.1
-
18
-
-
36749052331
-
National scientific facilities and their science impact on nonbiomedical research
-
Kinney, A. L. (2007). National scientific facilities and their science impact on nonbiomedical research. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 104: 17943-17947.
-
(2007)
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
, vol.104
, pp. 17943-17947
-
-
Kinney, A.L.1
-
19
-
-
0043162145
-
Comparison between impact factors and citations in evidence-based practice guidelines
-
Nakayama, T., Fukui, T., Fukuhara, S., Tsutani, K., Yamazaki, S. (2003). Comparison between impact factors and citations in evidence-based practice guidelines. JAMA, 290: 755-756.
-
(2003)
JAMA
, vol.290
, pp. 755-756
-
-
Nakayama, T.1
Fukui, T.2
Fukuhara, S.3
Tsutani, K.4
Yamazaki, S.5
-
20
-
-
33748886135
-
The relationship between quality of research and citation frequency
-
Nieminen, P., Carpenter, J., Rucker, G., Schumacher, M. (2006). The relationship between quality of research and citation frequency. BMC Med Res Methodol, 6: 42.
-
(2006)
BMC Med Res Methodol
, vol.6
, pp. 42
-
-
Nieminen, P.1
Carpenter, J.2
Rucker, G.3
Schumacher, M.4
-
21
-
-
39049186090
-
Research misconduct policies of high impact biomedical journals
-
Redman, B. K., Merz, J. F. (2006). Research misconduct policies of high impact biomedical journals. Account Res, 13: 247-258.
-
(2006)
Account Res
, vol.13
, pp. 247-258
-
-
Redman, B.K.1
Merz, J.F.2
-
22
-
-
0031049280
-
Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research
-
Seglen, P. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ, 314: 498-502.
-
(1997)
BMJ
, vol.314
, pp. 498-502
-
-
Seglen, P.1
-
23
-
-
85007731577
-
-
Smith, R. Journal accused of manipulating impact factor. BMJ, 314: 461.
-
Smith, R. Journal accused of manipulating impact factor. BMJ, 314: 461.
-
-
-
-
24
-
-
41249092383
-
Falsified papers in high-impact journals were slow to retract and indistinguishable from nonfraudulent papers
-
Trikalinos, N. A., Evangelou, E., Ioannidis, J. P. (2008). Falsified papers in high-impact journals were slow to retract and indistinguishable from nonfraudulent papers. J Clin Epidemiol, 61: 464-470.
-
(2008)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.61
, pp. 464-470
-
-
Trikalinos, N.A.1
Evangelou, E.2
Ioannidis, J.P.3
-
25
-
-
0348150699
-
Counting on citations: A flawed way to measure quality
-
Walter, G., Bloch, S., Hunt, G., Fisher, K. Counting on citations: A flawed way to measure quality. MJA, 178: 280-281.
-
MJA
, vol.178
, pp. 280-281
-
-
Walter, G.1
Bloch, S.2
Hunt, G.3
Fisher, K.4
-
26
-
-
33947540043
-
Should we ditch impact factors?
-
Williams, G. (2007). Should we ditch impact factors? BMJ, 334: 568.
-
(2007)
BMJ
, vol.334
, pp. 568
-
-
Williams, G.1
|