Meeting our ethical obligations in medical publishing: Responsibilities of editors, authors, and readers of peer-reviewed journals

Archives of Ophthalmology

Volumn 123, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 684-686

  Albert, Daniel M ^a   Liesegang, Thomas J ^b   Schachat, Andrew P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL RESEARCH; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSIBILITY; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; ETHICS; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; STANDARD; WRITING;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

AUTHORSHIP; EDITORIAL POLICIES; ETHICS, PROFESSIONAL; HUMANS; JOURNALISM, MEDICAL; PEER REVIEW; PERIODICALS; PUBLISHING;

EID: 18444416337     PISSN: 00039950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.123.5.684     Document Type: Editorial

References (10)

1. Petersen M. Madison Ave has growing role in the business of drug research. New York Times. November 22, 2002:A1.
2. DeAngelis CD, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA, et al. Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. JAMA. 2004;292:1363-1364.
3. Lock S. Journalology: evolution of medical journals and some current problems. J Intern Med. 1992;232:199-205.
4. Godlee F. The ethics of peer review. In: Jones AH, McLellan F. Ethical Issues in Biomedical Publication. Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2000:59-84.
5. Dickersin K, Min YI, Meinert CL. Factors influencing publication of research results: follow-up of applications submitted to two institutional review boards. JAMA. 1992;267:374-378.
6. Ravnskov U. Cholesterol lowering trials in coronary heart disease: frequency of citation and outcome. BMJ. 1992;305:15-19.
7. Leslie M. NetWatch: six degrees of Erdös. Science. 2004;305:317.
8. Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW. Medical journals and society: threats and responsibilities. J Intern Med. 1992;232:215-221.
9. Kapoor VK. Polyauthoritis giftosa. Lancet. 1995;346:1039.
10. Abby M, Massey MD, Galandiuk S, Polk HC Jr. Peer review is an effective screening process to evaluate medical manuscripts. JAMA. 1994;272:105-107.